Regardless of whether or not evolution (or a ferilized egg growing into a baby or a seed growing into a tree, etc.) violates the 2LOT is sort of beside the point, considering that creationism depends on miracles from on high. When have these ever been replicated in the lab? Where is the "credible evidence" for the creation hypothesis?
The Bible, of course, is so stringently scientific. It declares that people have been created from dust, folks rise from the dead, the Sun stands still in the air, and plenty of other phenomena that seem to defy what we know about science. Conveniently, the Bible tells us that believing without seeing is the noble way to approach its claims.
Materialistic science is based on the assumption that if natural law were subject to the whims of a supernatural entity, we would see evidence of this. Why has science only uncovered material mechanisms for all phenomena? Why does it seem that natural laws are the balance between regularity and randomness in our universe, not any willful being controlling things?
regards,
Esteban "Doubter" Hambre