Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Young earth creationism is valid and the macroevolutionary hypothesis is not valid
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 64 of 316 (90107)
03-03-2004 4:43 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by kendemyer
03-03-2004 4:34 PM


Re: re: miracles
quote:
I will also say that I have never understood the pink unicorn/leprauchan argument for the non existence of God. Because there is one false belief that does not make all beliefs false.
Excuse me, but how can you prove that belief in pink unicorns is false?
There are numerous references to unicorns in various texts throughout history, including the Bible. The color pink is an established fact. I can provide the wavelength of pink light, if you'd like. Sure, this doesn't provide proof that pink unicorns do exist, but you certainly can't prove that they don't.

"Perhaps you should take your furs and your literal interpretations to the other side of the river."
-Anya

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by kendemyer, posted 03-03-2004 4:34 PM kendemyer has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by kendemyer, posted 03-03-2004 4:58 PM Dan Carroll has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024