Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Young earth creationism is valid and the macroevolutionary hypothesis is not valid
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1534 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 4 of 316 (89803)
03-02-2004 2:35 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by kendemyer
03-02-2004 1:13 PM


Re: Young earth creationism is valid and the macroevolutionary hypothesis is not vali
Ken quotes old book writes:
"No fossil of any such birdlike reptile has yet been found."
http://www.bulletin.ac.cn/ACTION/2000121401.htm
Dude, most of your post contain 20 year old enclyclopedia clippings from the 80's They found out a few things since then. I am kinda not wanting to post a long list of links to rebutt 20 yr old encyclopedia quotes. But I am sure If I went through my grand daddys old Almanacs I could come up with a few more "Scientifc" quotes for you to post that no longer apply.
[This message has been edited by 1.61803, 03-02-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by kendemyer, posted 03-02-2004 1:13 PM kendemyer has not replied

1.61803
Member (Idle past 1534 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 11 of 316 (89825)
03-02-2004 3:50 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by kendemyer
03-02-2004 2:54 PM


Re: to previous poster
Um and your point is??????? Microraptor and Archeoptrix are not even the same dinosaur. I freely admit that Evolution does not have all the answers, and perhaps never will, But I have also visited the Museum of Natural History in NYC . I was pretty convinced of the fossil evidence presented. It is kind of hard to ignore a 20 foot TRex skeleton gaping down at you.. Maybe you could get the opportunity to go see the bones for yourself .
click
[This message has been edited by 1.61803, 03-02-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by kendemyer, posted 03-02-2004 2:54 PM kendemyer has not replied

1.61803
Member (Idle past 1534 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 16 of 316 (89841)
03-02-2004 4:31 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Loudmouth
03-02-2004 4:15 PM


I dont think we are getting through.
Hi Loud,
It seems we have a case of profound tunnel vision going on here in regards to Ken.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Loudmouth, posted 03-02-2004 4:15 PM Loudmouth has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Loudmouth, posted 03-02-2004 5:11 PM 1.61803 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024