|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: "THE EXODUS REVEALED" VIDEO | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Hydarnes Inactive Member |
quote: I think we can both agree that an individual's knowledge should at least be relatively proportionate to the complexity of an issue they are willing to argue.
quote: I hope you can excuse me for declining to debate you on the basis of some presumed "ulterior motives". If you've read some material that you would specifically like me to source, that's fine by me. Just don't find me dignifying vacuous suspicions that are a dime a dozen.
quote: Unless you would have me believe that your stringent demand for sources betrays a severe double-standard [partiality?] on your part, please point out to me where you have unequivocally insisted that the same standard be imposed for everyone (including Lucianus and others proliferating unsourced "facts").
quote: Is this the new precedent for everyone now? To supplement every scintilla of written material with a credentialed source that "validates" it? Put me in my grave if you expect to be taken seriously on that. This message has been edited by Hydarnes, 07-29-2004 09:17 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hydarnes Inactive Member |
quote: You better quickly provide a credentialed source for that statement before mr. frog jumps on you. Most sources do agree btw that Thutmosis III WAS responsible, although how is it possible to get unmitigated proof for any similar finds? P.S. Do I need to source every article for that historical placement? This message has been edited by Hydarnes, 07-29-2004 09:36 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
How about two or three - just the author and the peer-reviewed journal will be fine.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hydarnes Inactive Member |
quote: Don't compel us to question your caliber of logical thinking. How on earth do chariots, wheels and bones get scattered across a seabed from both sides? This isn't even to mention that when you examine the entire scheme of events that there is something of significance connected with these finds. Defying your own reasoning poses something of an indication as to what lengths you are willing to venture in order to avoid [at all cost] having to acknowledge even a potential for something in the Bible to be historically accurate. I think you can do a lot better than this.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hydarnes Inactive Member |
quote: Are you addressing everyone?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
This isn't even to mention that when you examine the entire scheme of events that there is something of significance connected with these finds.
I always struggle to see how you leap from A to C as you seem to be suggesting with this post. Where is your evidence linking those matters?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
I haven't time to check it out now but I beleive that Tyldesly rejects the idea that Thutmosis III was responsible in her book on Hatshepsut. Not to mention that Lysimachus goes on and on about uncertainties whenever he is exposed to evidence contrary to his claims (e.g. if we find mummies for two people that the Wyatt hypothesis clims were the same person).
No comment on any of the important points I raised ? Any comment on any of the other problems ? (e.g. that by all reputable sources Senmut was around long after Tuthmosis II died).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hydarnes Inactive Member |
quote: Isn't everyone?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hydarnes Inactive Member |
quote: I'm sorry, I was assuming that you were tracking with this thread. You might want to retreat in your reading a bit. I can see how it would be confusing. This message has been edited by Hydarnes, 07-29-2004 09:45 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1496 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Isn't everyone? Yes, but they've been making at least token efforts to substantiate their claims with other sources.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hydarnes Inactive Member |
quote: So is she to be granted more credence than the majority? Or are you beginning to realize that when it comes to Egypt, "fact" shouldn't be regarded lightly.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hydarnes Inactive Member |
quote: Be my guest and show me! Where does lucianus provide a source for the "fact" that Pithom was only used as a storage site during the time of Rameses. ....I can't help but notice how conspicuous it is for you to so spontaneously coerce [only] me into some unreasonably arbitrary criteria for sourcing. This message has been edited by Hydarnes, 07-29-2004 09:54 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
Since the question is only whether it is UNCERTAIN that Tuthmosis defaced Hatshepsut's inscriptions there is no need to give Tyldesly's opinion that he did not precedence over the majority opinion that he did.
When you understand that fallacious reasonign and appealing to uncertainties cannot make your case then we will have made real progress.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1496 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Be my guest and show me! Easy, Hydarnes. It's you we're talking about.
...I can't help but notice how conspicuous it is for you to so spontaneously challenge me [solely] an unreasonable critera. You're absolutely free to challenge any claims that haven't been substantiated to your satisfaction as well. Tu quoque, however, is a fallacy. Is there some reason you're so resistant to follow the rules? Here's the rule, just for reference:
quote: I'm not asking for the Moon, Hydarnes, and since I'm only observing this thread I'm not interested in taking sides.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Prince Lucianus Inactive Member |
Don't put words in my mouth dude:
My post: 419
I didn't say onlyNow, even if Pithom was older (which hasn't been shown yet), you must at least confirm that Pithom was used as a storage city when Ramses build it Lucy Bible Search Results "Death & Dead" were found 827 times in 751 verses. Thats a Whole Lotta Suffering "Dear God, I understand that if I fail to believe in you, I'll burn in Hell for all eternity. Thanks for being such a good sport about it." -- Dr. Oswald Pratt
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024