When is enough enough concerning allowing religious parents to kill their children by not seeking adequate medical care for their children.
I've pondered similar things. Although I am not a religious man, I defend the freedom of religion and separation of church and state. But we all have heard of tragic stories, like Watchtower or Christian Scientist families who deny life-saving blood transfusions based on an obscure biblical passage. And at some point you have to say that you can't just use the scapegoat that it is done under religious pretenses.
Should we allow chickens everywhere to be beheaded and their blood drained in the comfort of the Santa Ria practitioner's home and disregard animal rights? Should Native Americans get a green light on Peyote because their ancestors used it?
I don't know, because how easy would it be to state that anything could be done under the guise of religion as a get out of jail free card?
Even when the girl lapsed into a coma by the court account the parents chose not to seek medical care for their daughter.
We are not living in the 19th or 18th century. This is the 21st century and their actions and behavior were inexcusible.
There will on some level always be a crux when private rights and government welfare clash. On most occasions I prefer the freedom from government intrusion, but there is simply no denying that it has its place and its benefit when appropriate.
"I love the man that can smile in trouble, that can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. 'Tis the business of little minds to shrink, but he whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves his conduct, will pursue his principles unto death. " Thomas Paine