Giant People in the bible?

John - I don't think that counts in the sense of what creationists claim - in terms of giant men we are looking at 20 feet upwards.

But how do you know that we are not already freakly tall?Surely Diet and genetics are more likely causes?This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-13-2004 12:15 PM

I've had a quick google but can't find anything of that nature (anyone else?) - which is surprising Ron generally has some bogus evidence by some un-named person ready to hand. I can find the usual crackpot claims that evil scientists are covering the evidence but that's about it.This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-14-2004 09:38 AMThis message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-14-2004 09:40 AM

you sure Ron and his chums never worked on the X-Files? Only mulder lost more evidence!

I love some of this old victorian stuff.

there is something to study in that? How is a photo "data"?m

hey - we could do with your help on the Jesus blood thread! We can't work out how Ron lost the evidence for that one.

the standard "I got nothing in my hand but I'll try and bluff it".John I'll give you 10/1 that the bones are lost or can't be examined for some reason.This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-17-2004 02:25 AM

oh sure - it's an interesting story, but I've been a "skeptic" for many years, I've never see a claim yet that does not involve some slight of hand.Look at my blood of jesus thread - a 100% fraud.

we are getting off-topic now, but I'd think that it was all done because of mental illness rather than any bad intent.

I always think of this when I see Ron's work:http://www.stuffucanuse.com/...on_landings/moon_landings.htm

yes but you would not have to go much further to hit the square cubed law.

hah!

Yes - I've done some checking and it seems that it's a well-known spoof site. I guess L saw the word christian and that was all the "proof" he needed. Mind you, he has proved a fantastic example of how creationists will swallow any old bull they see on a website.Let's look at his comments again:

quote:

---

You sound so much like children--not like honest seekers for truth. Such a shame.

---

Well you sound (no actually this PROVES that you ARE) like a guy who'll swallow any old rubbish on a website. You may be seeking the truth but you seem pretty poorly-equiped to find it. That could explain you and Ron "butter fingers" Wyatt. Such a shame.

quote:

---

The first photo was definitely a hoax, but why would the second one be a hoax too? It is much more realistic. Hopefully, one day we will get out those giants buried in the cave of En-Gedi.

---

Maybe you should work on the principle that just because one is a hoax that the next one is not automatically going to be true.

quote:

---

f a mass giant burial is one day officially revealed to the world, I just wonder what evolutionists will do then. Will they suddenly come up with all sorts of new explanations to try and state that there were giants in the process of evolution? I wonder how they will attempt to fit these finds with their garbled evolutionary theories. ROFL.

---

Actually there ARE people ROFLing but it's don't seem to be you! This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 09-20-2004 04:46 PMThis message has been edited by Charles Knight, 09-20-2004 05:36 PM

What's interesting is that the site seems to have disappeared a little while back - It's seems that even this claim was 3rd hand.