Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What evidence absolutely rules out a Creator
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 84 of 300 (294893)
03-13-2006 11:22 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Faith
03-12-2006 8:44 PM


What evidence absolutely rules out a Creator?
It depends upon how you want to define the nature/abilities of your Creator.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Faith, posted 03-12-2006 8:44 PM Faith has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 87 of 300 (294901)
03-13-2006 11:34 AM
Reply to: Message 43 by Faith
03-13-2006 12:37 AM


the answer to that old question, finally
quote:
If God is perfect then everything He is and does is perfect. He couldn't create an imperfect world, by definition.
So, we have finally found something that God cannot do.
This must mean that God is NOT all-powerful.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Faith, posted 03-13-2006 12:37 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 89 by Faith, posted 03-13-2006 12:05 PM nator has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 88 of 300 (294903)
03-13-2006 11:38 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by robinrohan
03-13-2006 9:39 AM


quote:
It disproves the general theistic God--the all-knowing, all-powerful, all-good God of Western tradition.
And that's the only God worth any serious consideration.
Why is it the only God worth serious consideration?
This message has been edited by schrafinator, 03-13-2006 11:39 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by robinrohan, posted 03-13-2006 9:39 AM robinrohan has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 92 of 300 (294921)
03-13-2006 12:30 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by Faith
03-13-2006 12:05 PM


Re: the answer to that old question, finally
quote:
There are many many things that God cannot do and yet be all-powerful.
That is a logical contradiction.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by Faith, posted 03-13-2006 12:05 PM Faith has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 133 of 300 (295136)
03-14-2006 8:50 AM
Reply to: Message 109 by crashfrog
03-13-2006 8:18 PM


Re: My view
quote:
You'll pardon me if the moral calculus doesn't quite add up. 6 thousand years (we'll use the YEC timeline) of death and horror just for the "privlege" of having 1.5 billion Christians tell me how great they are, and how I should be just like them, except if I'm gay or a woman who needs to have an abortion.
You don't need to be a woman who needs an abortion for those Christians to tell you that you aren't good.
You just need to be a woman to be told by them that you are inadequate.
Or, at least, not as good as a man and in need of a man to lead you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by crashfrog, posted 03-13-2006 8:18 PM crashfrog has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 134 of 300 (295138)
03-14-2006 8:54 AM
Reply to: Message 114 by robinrohan
03-13-2006 11:04 PM


Re: My view
quote:
I don't see how these religions directly address the problem of human sufffering, but then I don't know that much about the Eastern religions.
Buddhism teaches that wordly desire is the source of all human suffering.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by robinrohan, posted 03-13-2006 11:04 PM robinrohan has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 183 of 300 (295727)
03-15-2006 7:54 PM
Reply to: Message 170 by Faith
03-15-2006 5:36 PM


Re: What other Gods?
quote:
It's just Christians, and Christians of the worst kind, we fundies, who believe in the Fall (at least with the logical implications who {abe: I meant you} draw from it}, and whose theology is therefore at serious odds with evolution.
Don't forget the Stalinist Soviets.
They were opposed to evolution, too.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 170 by Faith, posted 03-15-2006 5:36 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 184 by Faith, posted 03-15-2006 7:58 PM nator has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 234 of 300 (296087)
03-16-2006 8:06 PM
Reply to: Message 198 by veiledvirtue
03-16-2006 2:21 PM


Re: What do you think.
quote:
evolution takes faith
God takes faith
Does the Germ Theoy of Disease take faith in the same way God takes faith?
Does the Theory of a Heliocentric Solar System take faith in the same way God takes faith?
Does the Atomic Theory of Matter take faith in the same way God takes faith?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 198 by veiledvirtue, posted 03-16-2006 2:21 PM veiledvirtue has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 280 by veiledvirtue, posted 03-18-2006 12:46 AM nator has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 259 of 300 (296163)
03-17-2006 9:02 AM
Reply to: Message 241 by Buzsaw
03-16-2006 10:01 PM


Re: Individual proof?
quote:
Again, Jar, my friend, I'm not saying you're being wilfully ignorant, but I've posted a number of Biblical prophecies over the years which you've rejected as such.
And, over the years, you've never been able, when pressed on the details, to provide anything that convinced anyone who wasn't already a believer.
Surely, this would give a rational person pause.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 241 by Buzsaw, posted 03-16-2006 10:01 PM Buzsaw has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 261 of 300 (296165)
03-17-2006 9:08 AM
Reply to: Message 257 by Faith
03-17-2006 8:55 AM


Re: robinrohan the true rationalist?
quote:
Robin Rohan has a remarkably rational mind for an infidel.
His logic is flawed.
This was explained up thread.
It was even expressed in formal terms by somebody, and it was shown to be faulty.
Perhaps you wouldn't mind converting Robin's logical progression in formal terms and explain how no leaps are made.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 257 by Faith, posted 03-17-2006 8:55 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 262 by Faith, posted 03-17-2006 9:10 AM nator has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 264 of 300 (296172)
03-17-2006 9:17 AM
Reply to: Message 262 by Faith
03-17-2006 9:10 AM


Re: robinrohan the true rationalist?
If it is assertion that you won't mind doing what I asked.
Please convert robin's statements to a formal logical progression.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 262 by Faith, posted 03-17-2006 9:10 AM Faith has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 268 of 300 (296178)
03-17-2006 9:23 AM
Reply to: Message 265 by ramoss
03-17-2006 9:18 AM


Re: robinrohan the true rationalist?
quote:
You are making an assertion it is all assertions. When people show you the logical progression, you just deny it, and say 'it is all assertions'.
Surely you can do better than that.
Prediction:
Faith will somehow blame the evolution supporters for her inability to produce the formal logic of robin's position.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 265 by ramoss, posted 03-17-2006 9:18 AM ramoss has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024