Try to keep hatred out of our Constitution.

Not when you're using "different" as a way of segregating a minority. "Different" schools for blacks and whites are inherently unequal. "Different" categories for the unions of heterosexuals and homosexuals are inherently unequal. The second sentence here contradicts the first. Pick one. That's unfortunate. But I don't see what it has to do with gay marriage. No you didn't. You just said that, the rules aside, the man gets shafted in practice. If both were men, or both were women, I fail to see how this would be relevant.

---

"We had survived to turn on the History Channel
And ask our esteemed panel, Why are we alive? And here's how they replied:
You're what happens when two substances collide
And by all accounts you really should have died."
-Andrew Bird

It's Champaign-Urbana. Nowhere near as classy as Champagne.

---

"We had survived to turn on the History Channel
And ask our esteemed panel, Why are we alive? And here's how they replied:
You're what happens when two substances collide
And by all accounts you really should have died."
-Andrew Bird

Why not? Both are bullshit arbitrary distinctions designed to keep the minority segregated away from the majority. It is? Well, there's an easy way to test that idea. Choose to be aroused by men. Will your penis hard at the sight of a guy. Be sure to report back to us on how hot it was. There is no need for different institutions for homosexual and heterosexual unions. They can all function in the same institution called marriage. Oh, my turn! "Nuh-uh!"That was fun.

---

"We had survived to turn on the History Channel
And ask our esteemed panel, Why are we alive? And here's how they replied:
You're what happens when two substances collide
And by all accounts you really should have died."
-Andrew Bird