Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Atheism, a dangerous idea?
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 77 of 241 (328539)
07-03-2006 12:07 PM
Reply to: Message 75 by jar
07-03-2006 12:02 PM


Re: Need some clarification
Then you'll have to be more clear as to what you meant when you said:
quote:
riVeRraT writes:
But an atheist can do what ever he wants.
Why? Doesn't the atheist live within the same society as the theist?
What does our society have to do with an individuals morals if the law has nothing to do with it?
Where do morals come from?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by jar, posted 07-03-2006 12:02 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by jar, posted 07-03-2006 12:21 PM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 91 by kjsimons, posted 07-03-2006 5:50 PM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 79 of 241 (328541)
07-03-2006 12:14 PM
Reply to: Message 78 by sidelined
07-03-2006 12:08 PM


Re: Atheist moral code
riVeRrat
And while you may or may not agree, it is a "floating" set of moral rules.
This is not a supported statement RR .Please explain.
Well, what do you base this set of rules on?
Since an atheist such as myself can produce a code of conduct that you do not object to means that moral codes need not be different because you believe in God and I have no belief in the supernatural.
I never said they need to be different or indifferent.
Indeed the common ground of men is far deeper than our differences.
I do agree with that, and the way I see it, as I have explained, is that God put them there. That doesn't mean that they always shine through.
For some cultures compared to ours, it is not so common, and they think way different than you or I.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by sidelined, posted 07-03-2006 12:08 PM sidelined has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 84 of 241 (328564)
07-03-2006 1:45 PM
Reply to: Message 81 by nwr
07-03-2006 12:40 PM


Re: Moral standards
50 years ago, many Christian fundamentalists were racists, and were quoting scripture as the basis for their racism.
A very good point. But when I read the bible, I do not find anyway that I good back up a racist point of view.
One could easily say to a Christian who was using the bible to back his own personal racism, "what about love one an other?"
I put it to you that the difference you see in morality for atheists vs Christians is no more than a figment of your imagination.
I never said one was better than the other.
I am saying one is written, the other is not.
One is debatable, the other is not.
2 people have listed some of their morals, I cannot debate them, it is what they believe.
But if a Christian came up to me, and said, hey, I am a racist by the power vested in me by Christ our Lord, I dam sure would debate it with him.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by nwr, posted 07-03-2006 12:40 PM nwr has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 89 by LinearAq, posted 07-03-2006 2:48 PM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 103 by kongstad, posted 07-04-2006 11:12 AM riVeRraT has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 85 of 241 (328565)
07-03-2006 1:48 PM
Reply to: Message 82 by deerbreh
07-03-2006 1:20 PM


Re: What does this mean?
There is something unpleasant about being around a person who thinks that the only reason for behaving is because God will smite you if you misbehave.
Smite?
So much for Grace, and forgiveness.
But if what your trying to say, is that because of the way a person is, you wouldn't have a beer with him, I can understand that. What I can't understand is you, or Ned associating all believers to be like that. That to me is prejudice.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by deerbreh, posted 07-03-2006 1:20 PM deerbreh has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 87 by deerbreh, posted 07-03-2006 1:53 PM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 88 by NosyNed, posted 07-03-2006 2:03 PM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 96 of 241 (328713)
07-04-2006 9:39 AM
Reply to: Message 88 by NosyNed
07-03-2006 2:03 PM


Re: All believers ...
I have heard and read a number of sermons from the leaders of your community that rant about the dangers of atheism because of what it does to morals. I hope they are not right but they hint at a grave danger.
I don't think we are in grave danger, because we are educated enough to know the difference now. But maybe not all people are?
Also we just don't know for sure if God will do something to us if we aren't following His ways, and not believing in Him, even though we all have the capacity too. I think that is what fundementalists are afraid of.
But I agree with you, I think they should be more fearful of their own actions, and fake faiths.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by NosyNed, posted 07-03-2006 2:03 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 97 of 241 (328717)
07-04-2006 9:47 AM
Reply to: Message 89 by LinearAq
07-03-2006 2:48 PM


Re: Moral standards
Since this is an absolute standard, I assume that you believe all Christian denominations also agree with the Biblical definition that you have provided. Can you provide some evidence to that?
I honestly don't know what to believe at this point in life. The quotes you provided are from the OT, something that which is not completely useful as a moral guide since Jesus came, and fulfilled the law.
Jesus says, turn the other cheek, and love your enemy. So it puzzles me how someone like Bush can instigate so much war. Maybe if we started acting like the Christians we claimed to be, then more people in this world would see the light, and there would be more peace.
But then again if Bush did that, he would be blurring the lines of church and state I guess.
In my own personal life, I made a vow to forgive everyone who I thought was my enemy (a very small amount of people) and now they are my friends. I forgive people as they do stuff to me, and allow God to handle it for me, and it is one of the miracles of faith that I can see work everyday in my life, that confirms God lives up to His promises.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by LinearAq, posted 07-03-2006 2:48 PM LinearAq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 130 by LinearAq, posted 07-05-2006 9:45 AM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 98 of 241 (328718)
07-04-2006 9:50 AM
Reply to: Message 91 by kjsimons
07-03-2006 5:50 PM


Re: Need some clarification
And if your god didn't set them down in the good book for them, why would he have to do it for us?
That is what separates us from the animals. We are but one species with many different pecking orders. It would seem that God wants us to resist this natural (possibly sinful) pecking order, when he says love your enemy, and love others.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by kjsimons, posted 07-03-2006 5:50 PM kjsimons has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by kjsimons, posted 07-04-2006 10:11 AM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 107 of 241 (328809)
07-04-2006 4:07 PM
Reply to: Message 99 by kjsimons
07-04-2006 10:11 AM


Re: Need some clarification
Why would we have to have some god(s) hand us down a bunch of rules and threatening us to get us to behave? The answer is we don't!
That is not the answer, since you are part of an evolution of intelligence that brought about atheism, and it started with believing in gods. It is human nature to believe in something more than what is.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by kjsimons, posted 07-04-2006 10:11 AM kjsimons has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by kjsimons, posted 07-04-2006 4:12 PM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 109 of 241 (328811)
07-04-2006 4:14 PM
Reply to: Message 104 by nator
07-04-2006 11:47 AM


but I find it difficult to believe that all of us could have such incredibly poor reading comprehension.
It's not all of us, only a select few, who's ideals seem to coinside with each other.
but when we kick the crap out of your arguments,
You are not "kicking that crap" out of anything other than your own misunderstanding.
You know for a fact, if I am wrong, I admit it, something I have never seen you do.
I think you are using the "I've been misunderstood" thing as a ruse to not have to address our rebuttals, since you have been known to be as slippery as a greased weasle under a sprinkler.
I am honored by that statement, really I am.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by nator, posted 07-04-2006 11:47 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by nator, posted 07-04-2006 9:38 PM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 110 of 241 (328812)
07-04-2006 4:16 PM
Reply to: Message 108 by kjsimons
07-04-2006 4:12 PM


Re: Need some clarification
I just don't see that as evidence for god(s) and definitely not the Judeo (sp?) Christian gods.
The desire to know God, is not from God?
At one time, I might have agreed with you, but now I see differently.
There is a lot of power in the fact that we as humans desire to know if there is a God or not.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by kjsimons, posted 07-04-2006 4:12 PM kjsimons has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by ramoss, posted 07-04-2006 9:29 PM riVeRraT has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 114 of 241 (328848)
07-04-2006 8:21 PM
Reply to: Message 111 by GDR
07-04-2006 4:35 PM


Re: Atheism has been a very good thing for Christianity
As I said, I believe that Atheism had a cleansing affect on the Christian church and has been a positive for our society.
Amen.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by GDR, posted 07-04-2006 4:35 PM GDR has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 131 of 241 (328915)
07-05-2006 10:22 AM
Reply to: Message 117 by nator
07-04-2006 9:38 PM


Lots of members here don't even bother responding to you anymore rat.
Wow, you can speak for everyone here, amazing.
But when we demolish your argument, you slide behind being "misunderstood".
Well, thats just not true.
You shouldn't be.
I just called you a dishonest debater.
I know what you called me, I am just honored that you think I can be so slick, when I am really not slick at all. It's pretty funny actually, and just another mark in the belt of marks where you have decided to attack the person, and not the arguement. Congrats.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by nator, posted 07-04-2006 9:38 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 133 by nator, posted 07-05-2006 10:36 AM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 132 of 241 (328916)
07-05-2006 10:31 AM
Reply to: Message 130 by LinearAq
07-05-2006 9:45 AM


Re: Moral standards
Especially, since God considers the killing of innocents (infants) tho proper thing to do at times. I would think that absolute morality rules would be well defined enough for anyone to be able to follow them exactly.
IT is obvious that murder cannot be summed up into one rule. There are many different levels of murder, and manslaughter. God's morals are not physical ones, but ones of heart.
Too many people in here like to refer to the killing of the OT, as if they actually undertand it completely.
You pay taxes and support a nation that kills innocent people, and infants as well. Are you morally incorrect?
By this quote you seem to be saying that killing or fighting is not to be done at all. It seems that a "Christian" nation should have no need for armed forces since they should always turn the other cheek.
That is exactly what I am saying. But that is not what happens. People say there are verses that can support that fact that we go to war, but I don't know what they are.
Think about it, if we spent 100 billion helping Iraq, instead of bombing them, would the outcome be better?
That is why I say I don't know what to believe when it comes to that.
Maybe my faith is not strong enough.
And how many of these enemies were trying to end your life or enslave you?
No-one has tried to kill me, but there has been some tuff things to let go of.
Should start a thread on defending yourself, biblically speaking.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by LinearAq, posted 07-05-2006 9:45 AM LinearAq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 134 by LinearAq, posted 07-05-2006 12:03 PM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 146 of 241 (329118)
07-05-2006 10:34 PM
Reply to: Message 133 by nator
07-05-2006 10:36 AM


But hey, if you would rather be considered to convey your ideas so poorly that many people continually misunderstand you, then OK.
Is this the riVeRraT conveys his thoughts badly thread?
Some people, schraf, and I know exactly why I am being mis-understood, maybe one day you will understand. I am not the best at conveying my thoughts into writing, I have admitted that many times. What bothers me most is when people like you do not take the time to find out exactly what it is I mean. I take the time out to make I understand your posts, you could at least give me the same respect, and stop ganging up on me all the time. It's a poor show.
You just indulged in one above; I said "many" and you changed it to "everyone".
Keep attacking me, and that is what you'll get. Lots, and everyone, are a lot closer to each other, than the actual truth. You make it sound like there is some kind of EVC conspiracy against the ratboy from hell.
If .999... can equal 1, then lots can equal everyone, whats the problem?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by nator, posted 07-05-2006 10:36 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 148 by nator, posted 07-05-2006 11:19 PM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 147 of 241 (329126)
07-05-2006 10:48 PM
Reply to: Message 134 by LinearAq
07-05-2006 12:03 PM


Re: Moral standards
I didn't expect you to "sum it up in one rule". What I did expect was that you could at least use the Bible to provide me with the limits of authorized killing. Some sort of line where it is no longer mere killing but actually a sin.
I thought I did, when I mentioned the ways Jesus is trying to teach us?
Let him without sin cast the first stone, love your enemy, turn the other cheek, etc.
I cannot speak for the actions of the OT, well because I just didn't live during that time. Maybe it was a necessary evil? God did send evil into the world.
Perhaps expounding on the morals-not-being-physical-butl-of-the-heart statement would get us closer to this absolute moral standard that Christians have and Athiests lack.
I don't think Christian morals are absolutes, otherwise there wouldn't be so many denominations. They are however debatable since there is a book to go off of. Atheists morals are not debatable. They draw their moral standard from their own mind.
But I understand what your saying, and many Christians will draw their own moral standard also, and not really follow "the good book". But that is the point of reference I am talking about.
But I guess faith is so dam confusing these days, that you could be 100% correct.
The killing of the OT is not completely understood by me. That's why I was asking you to provide some instruction here. Clearly, killing other humans is not always catagorized as murder regardless of their manevolence or history of bad behavior. So the question is still out there for those who claim that there is an absolute morality displayed in the Bible
I would guess that the OT would be closer to an absolute morality, than nowadays. The law was pretty strict. If you expect me to answer why God told people to kill, I cannot. The God I know doesn't do that anymore.
If I had to guess, it would be that the Jews were the only ones that really had God in their hearts, and everyone else's hearts were hardened, and their fates sealed. If there is one thing I have noticed in my life, and that is that all the good, and the bad has led me to a better understanding of God. What I used to percieve as bad, I now see the good of it. Having an experience with God, has helped me see it also. But He is not done with me yet, still got a long way to go.
I pay taxes because Jesus said I have to.
I was thinking about that the other day, and I used to take it the way you said it, but he didn't say pay taxes, he said "give to Ceasar what is due to Ceasar" Maybe Ceasar doesn't deserve a dam thing. Maybe that's why we have a declaration of Independence. Was just a thought. again, I think it comes down to a matter of heart.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by LinearAq, posted 07-05-2006 12:03 PM LinearAq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 150 by LinearAq, posted 07-06-2006 7:04 AM riVeRraT has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024