Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Surrendering to Jesus/God is Not Biblical
CTD
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 11 of 300 (392767)
04-02-2007 8:14 AM


1Cor 6:20 (KJS) For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's.
Not much interpretation is needful for this one. Your body and your spirit are God's.
God isn't redeeming a watch from a pawnshop. He's redeeming a lost soul from Hell.
It is totally contrary to scripture to claim one who has been redeemed has no obligation to serve God. I can't think of any denomination or sect that makes that claim. But I don't get out as much as I used to...
Luke 16:13 No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
The unbeliever may cry "false dichotomy!" The Christian doesn't speak arrogantly against Jesus. This is THE dichotomy. Take your pick.
purpledawn, it is a scary thing to surrender control to another, even God. But how could you call Him "Lord" if you didn't intend to serve Him? He has no intention of abusing His servants. He loves us. He who cannot lie has said
Matt 11:
[28] Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.
[29] Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls.
[30] For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.
Pride would have us bargain with God as with an equal. God is not a man. We are not His equal. We cannot equal His love. That is why He is the ultimate master.

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by purpledawn, posted 04-02-2007 10:37 AM CTD has replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 23 of 300 (393006)
04-03-2007 7:34 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by purpledawn
04-02-2007 10:37 AM


Re: Light Burden
The point is that neither Jesus no God asks that we give up control of our lives. They do ask that we choose to follow God's commands because it is a better way of life, which is what Jesus is referring to in Matthew 11. Following Jesus and learning from him is an easier path to following God's commands than that of the Jewish teachers with their fence around the Torah. His way does not put unneccesary burdens on the followers.
Now there are things in life we can't control, such as the weather and other people; but we can control our response to those things.
IMO, the psychology behind the teaching of "giving control to God" is essentially saying to accept that there are things we cannot change. We can only change the things we have the power to change. (que sera sera)
The Christian is far from free of obligations. Some have situations which might make it appear so, but recall that the gospel has been spread abroad to all lands. This means that in lands where things are easy, there will be Christians, likewise where things aren't so easy.
Time is also a factor. Peter's three-fold denial, was there no burden? The Christians who even now must meet in secret in lands where the Bible is banned, what of them? Have they no burden?
Even in "better" places, persons have been disowned by parents for following Jesus. Is this not a burden?
We know not our future. We know not what burdens shall come upon us. What you describe sounds more like "if I just agree to be a good person and stop sinning, can I be saved?" If you look at the price paid for salvation to be possible, how can you be reluctant to pitch in and do everything in your power to give God His "money's worth"? (sorry to use that term in this context)
One thing I might add is that God never gives us any burden too great for us to bear. I can look it up if you'd like. He knows our limits and loves us.
I'll also mention the example of Moses. Moses was very reluctant to do God's bidding. (see Exodus 3-4) But God persuaded him, and as a result God had "excuses" to bless and reward Moses. God is always looking for an "excuse" to bless his children. Thanks to Thomas, we all get a blessing who believe without seeing!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by purpledawn, posted 04-02-2007 10:37 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by purpledawn, posted 04-03-2007 1:01 PM CTD has replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 31 of 300 (393256)
04-04-2007 3:27 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by purpledawn
04-03-2007 1:01 PM


Re: Light Burden
purpledawn writes:
The light burden comments dealt with what Jesus supposedly said in Matthew 11, which some feel deals with the oppressive obervance of the Jewish precepts of the time. I wasn't commenting on whether it was a true statement. Jesus' expectations were easier than dealing with the fence that was put around the Torah.
Right off I,d disagree with that interpretation. The Jewish disciples continued in the law until after Jesus' death, so nobody seems to have understood it that way. Prior to His death, they were under the law.
Luke 23
[44] And it was about the sixth hour, and there was a darkness over all the earth until the ninth hour.
[45] And the sun was darkened, and the veil of the temple was rent in the midst.
[46] And when Jesus had cried with a loud voice, he said, Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit: and having said thus, he gave up the ghost.
The rending of the veil in verse 45 was the end of the law for believers, although they didn't understand it as such right away, and some may still believe otherwise.
purpledawn writes:
I'm also not talking about salvation.
Oh. Well, I was going to get back to that and clarify that full repentance and asking to be saved based on the sacrifice of Jesus is all that's required according to many scriptures; but God examines the heart, and it's hard to say whether or not "full repentance" always includes an implication of willingness to serve God. It's God's call, not mine.
This story isn't dealing with right behavior or wrong behavior, but a specific job God gave to Moses.
When it comes to the teaching on surrendering one's life, I'm thinking of the "average Joe".
That's my point. Our burdens aren't guaranteed to be restricted merely to "right and wrong behaviour".
There are no "average Joe" servants. Peter and Andrew and others were fishermen... until they decided to follow Jesus. A Christian may be called to service right away, or later or never. It's kind of like joining the reserve army.
And "right and wrong behaviour" must include obedience. We are not to disobey simply because we "see nothing wrong" with it.
I don't know what you're looking for, but if you seek the truth, and you're willing to accept God's truth, you'll find it eventually.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by purpledawn, posted 04-03-2007 1:01 PM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by purpledawn, posted 04-04-2007 10:02 AM CTD has replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 50 of 300 (393511)
04-05-2007 2:13 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by purpledawn
04-04-2007 10:02 AM


Re: Light Burden
purpledawn writes:
Yes they did as did Jesus before he died, but did they keep the "fence" up around the Torah or did they temper that as Jesus taught them?
I don't know.
How do you feel that God exercises restraining or directing influence over an individual, who has given control of their life to him, today?
I feel He tailors His methods on an individual basis. I would not restrict these methods, lest I speak erroneously against the Holy Spirit.
If I may ask, what harm could come from accepting the Lord as one's master? Are there any scriptures which lead you to believe it is incorrect to do so?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by purpledawn, posted 04-04-2007 10:02 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by purpledawn, posted 04-05-2007 2:55 PM CTD has not replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 149 of 300 (394398)
04-11-2007 1:29 AM
Reply to: Message 148 by purpledawn
04-10-2007 8:18 PM


Re: God's Will
I'll try once more.
Proverbs 21:2
Every way of a man is right in his own eyes: but the LORD pondereth the hearts.
A man can justify anything, to his own content. Without being subject to God, it would be easy to fool oneself into believing one had given up wrong behavior.
But there is a more direct line of reasoning. All are born in sin. All are by nature enemies of God. Those who have become children of God have surrendered, and from both the standpoint of a defeated enemy and from the standpoint of a child these people are obligated to do whatever God instructs them to do.
James 4 begins
[1] From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members?
[2] Ye lust, and have not: ye kill, and desire to have, and cannot obtain: ye fight and war, yet ye have not, because ye ask not.
[3] Ye ask, and receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon your lusts.
[4] Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.
[5] Do ye think that the scripture saith in vain, The spirit that dwelleth in us lusteth to envy?
[6] But he giveth more grace. Wherefore he saith, God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble.
[7] Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.
And in Romans 8
[5] For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit.
[6] For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.
[7] Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.
People are born with a carnal mind. If they never "surrender", what becomes of this enmity?
and in Hebrews 12 we see
[5] And ye have forgotten the exhortation which speaketh unto you as unto children, My son, despise not thou the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of him:
[6] For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth.
[7] If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not?
[8] But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons.
So we learn that those who are children of God will be corrected. It is to be expected - they are subject to do as they're told. God is a good Father. As His children, it is our place to do what He says. Where's the wiggle room? It isn't in the scriptures.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 148 by purpledawn, posted 04-10-2007 8:18 PM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 153 by purpledawn, posted 04-11-2007 9:24 AM CTD has replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 161 of 300 (394550)
04-12-2007 3:27 AM
Reply to: Message 153 by purpledawn
04-11-2007 9:24 AM


Re: Surrender vs Submission
The verses you share are not from the teachings of Jesus, but understanding that the authors aren't quoting Jesus; submitting or being subject to God isn't any closer to the general usage of the word surrender (give up control) than when I subject or submit to the governing authorities of today. I don't give up control of my life or actions. I consent to follow the rules. Which IMO, is what God and Jesus want us to do.
I don't get your point, I guess. There are areas of my life which I will never willingly submit to government interference. When it comes to doing anything God says, where can one rightfully draw the line? And why would any Christian want to do so? I cannot imagine any legitimate motive which would be consistent with the bible.
And I do not personally believe genuine repentance can be anything less than surrender. God judges the heart, and nothing is hidden from Him.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by purpledawn, posted 04-11-2007 9:24 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 168 by b b, posted 04-12-2007 12:59 PM CTD has not replied
 Message 178 by purpledawn, posted 04-12-2007 5:14 PM CTD has not replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 198 of 300 (395121)
04-15-2007 2:45 AM
Reply to: Message 170 by ringo
04-12-2007 1:47 PM


Ringo wrote:
We're not talking about life with or without Him. We're talking about life as a son/daughter or life as a servant. It may be that God wants servants as well as sons, but it's pretty clear (from the parable) that He doesn't want His sons to go backward and become mere servants.
I'll try to hold my tongue and let scripture speak for itself on this assertion. Wish me luck.
Rev. 1:1
The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John:
The whole book would seem to be addressed to God's servants.
Josh. 1:1
Now after the death of Moses the servant of the LORD it came to pass, that the LORD spake unto Joshua the son of Nun, Moses' minister, saying,
There are other places where Moses is called "the servant of God"; I stuck with the 1:1 pattern for simplicity.
Josh 24:29
And it came to pass after these things, that Joshua the son of Nun, the servant of the LORD, died, being an hundred and ten years old.
Joshua too? We seem to be developing a pattern here.
1 Sam. 3: 9-10
Therefore Eli said unto Samuel, Go, lie down: and it shall be, if he call thee, that thou shalt say, Speak, LORD; for thy servant heareth. So Samuel went and lay down in his place.
# [10] And the LORD came, and stood, and called as at other times, Samuel, Samuel. Then Samuel answered, Speak; for thy servant heareth.
Eli's advice differs from Ringo's unless I'm misinterpreting something.
1 Sam 23: 10-11
Then said David, O LORD God of Israel, thy servant hath certainly heard that Saul seeketh to come to Keilah, to destroy the city for my sake.
# [11] Will the men of Keilah deliver me up into his hand? will Saul come down, as thy servant hath heard? O LORD God of Israel, I beseech thee, tell thy servant. And the LORD said, He will come down.
This is getting too long. I'd better ff to the New Testament.
Matt 24: 44-51
[44] Therefore be ye also ready: for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of man cometh.
[45] Who then is a faithful and wise servant, whom his lord hath made ruler over his household, to give them meat in due season?
[46] Blessed is that servant, whom his lord when he cometh shall find so doing.
[47] Verily I say unto you, That he shall make him ruler over all his goods.
[48] But and if that evil servant shall say in his heart, My lord delayeth his coming;
[49] And shall begin to smite his fellowservants, and to eat and drink with the drunken;
[50] The lord of that servant shall come in a day when he looketh not for him, and in an hour that he is not aware of,
[51] And shall cut him asunder, and appoint him his portion with the hypocrites: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
A parable of a lord and his servants. As it is a parable, I suppose one could argue who the "lord" of this parable is, and who the "servants" are. I shan't offer my own interpretation, but leave it to each individual reader.
Luke 2: 25-32
[25] And, behold, there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon; and the same man was just and devout, waiting for the consolation of Israel: and the Holy Ghost was upon him.
[26] And it was revealed unto him by the Holy Ghost, that he should not see death, before he had seen the Lord's Christ.
[27] And he came by the Spirit into the temple: and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, to do for him after the custom of the law,
[28] Then took he him up in his arms, and blessed God, and said,
[29] Lord, now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace, according to thy word:
[30] For mine eyes have seen thy salvation,
[31] Which thou hast prepared before the face of all people;
[32] A light to lighten the Gentiles, and the glory of thy people Israel.
Being under the direct influence of the Holy Spirit, Simeon calls himself a servant. I would suggest he surrendered to this influence, but by now it would seem to be a lost cause to argue the point.
John 15: 14-23
[14] Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.
[15] Henceforth I call you not servants; for the servant knoweth not what his lord doeth: but I have called you friends; for all things that I have heard of my Father I have made known unto you.
[16] Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and ordained you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, he may give it you.
[17] These things I command you, that ye love one another.
[18] If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you.
[19] If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.
[20] Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also.
[21] But all these things will they do unto you for my name's sake, because they know not him that sent me.
[22] If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin: but now they have no cloke for their sin.
[23] He that hateth me hateth my Father also.
Here's the best case for the assertions of both Ringo and purpledawn. The apostles are called "friends" in relation to Jesus, and specifically "not servants" because they knew what was going on.
Acts 4: 18-30
[18] And they called them, and commanded them not to speak at all nor teach in the name of Jesus.
[19] But Peter and John answered and said unto them, Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye.
[20] For we cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard.
[21] So when they had further threatened them, they let them go, finding nothing how they might punish them, because of the people: for all men glorified God for that which was done.
[22] For the man was above forty years old, on whom this miracle of healing was shewed.
[23] And being let go, they went to their own company, and reported all that the chief priests and elders had said unto them.
[24] And when they heard that, they lifted up their voice to God with one accord, and said, Lord, thou art God, which hast made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all that in them is:
[25] Who by the mouth of thy servant David hast said, Why did the heathen rage, and the people imagine vain things?
[26] The kings of the earth stood up, and the rulers were gathered together against the Lord, and against his Christ.
[27] For of a truth against thy holy child Jesus, whom thou hast anointed, both Herod, and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles, and the people of Israel, were gathered together,
[28] For to do whatsoever thy hand and thy counsel determined before to be done.
[29] And now, Lord, behold their threatenings: and grant unto thy servants, that with all boldness they may speak thy word,
[30] By stretching forth thine hand to heal; and that signs and wonders may be done by the name of thy holy child Jesus.
Peter and John are both the servants of God here (verse 29). Perhaps friends of Jesus still serve the Father. Or am I mistaken?
Luke 22: 24-30
[24] And there was also a strife among them, which of them should be accounted the greatest.
[25] And he said unto them, The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and they that exercise authority upon them are called benefactors.
[26] But ye shall not be so: but he that is greatest among you, let him be as the younger; and he that is chief, as he that doth serve.
[27] For whether is greater, he that sitteth at meat, or he that serveth? is not he that sitteth at meat? but I am among you as he that serveth.
[28] Ye are they which have continued with me in my temptations.
[29] And I appoint unto you a kingdom, as my Father hath appointed unto me;
[30] That ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom, and sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel.
So what are we to make of Jesus' opinion of "mere servants"?
Life as a child or life as a servant? I submit this may be a false dichotomy. And I just might be a redneck...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 170 by ringo, posted 04-12-2007 1:47 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 199 by ringo, posted 04-15-2007 11:36 AM CTD has replied
 Message 200 by purpledawn, posted 04-15-2007 11:37 AM CTD has replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 201 of 300 (395214)
04-15-2007 4:44 PM
Reply to: Message 199 by ringo
04-15-2007 11:36 AM


Ringo writes:
and your Bible quotes all confirm what I said.
I can't dispute that, taking into account your unique interpreting skills.
Show us where a son gets demoted to servant.
I'm sure in your view, it is a demotion to become a servant of God; but there are no scriptures to support that opinion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 199 by ringo, posted 04-15-2007 11:36 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 202 by ringo, posted 04-15-2007 4:59 PM CTD has replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 203 of 300 (395221)
04-15-2007 5:13 PM
Reply to: Message 200 by purpledawn
04-15-2007 11:37 AM


Re: Metaphorical Servant
purpledawn writes:
I know that some find my way of viewing the Bible disconcerting, but to truly understand what is expected of us, I don't see how one can do otherwise.
What's expected? That's the whole point. The bottom line is that God expects us to understand that we have no right to refuse Him. None. Never ever.
What does that make us? Is the word "slave" or "servant" hurtful to one's pride?
Now what I don't understand is how it can be maintained that God expects us to think we have any right to refuse Him in any way. A man might think this, but not God himself. Any disobedience whatsoever is a failing. So how could God advocate disobedience? That's what does not make any sense at all.
That nonsense is not found in the bible. The spirit of rebellion is only found in men and fallen angels, and very few of them try to say "God wants us to be disobedient".
Again what is expected of the average housewife, farmer, or executive?
Obedience.
Just for grins, would anyone care to make a case that Jonah didn't surrender and serve God, or that God didn't want him to? I gotta see this.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 200 by purpledawn, posted 04-15-2007 11:37 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 212 by purpledawn, posted 04-15-2007 9:09 PM CTD has replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 204 of 300 (395222)
04-15-2007 5:27 PM
Reply to: Message 202 by ringo
04-15-2007 4:59 PM


I think I was pretty clear: I was talking about a transition from son to servant. I don't see how anybody could see that as anything but a demotion.
If your son let you down, would you take him back as your son or would you only deign to hire him back as an employee?
I'll ask again: if you have any scripture to show that God wants us to be His servants instead of His children, please show it.
Without exception, all children of God serve Him. The transition is your own invention, and isn't found in scripture.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 202 by ringo, posted 04-15-2007 4:59 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 205 by ringo, posted 04-15-2007 5:36 PM CTD has replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 206 of 300 (395230)
04-15-2007 6:26 PM
Reply to: Message 175 by purpledawn
04-12-2007 3:35 PM


Re: Mushing It All Together
b_b wrote:
The bible teaches that if you could fix it yourself you would have no need for God.
purpledawn replied:
So show me where God or Jesus say that.
b_b hasn't gotten around to it; but I don't think he'll mind if I pitch in.
Rom. 5: 1-6 {mostly verses 1 and 6 for this question}
[1] Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:
[2] By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.
[3] And not only so, but we glory in tribulations also: knowing that tribulation worketh patience;
[4] And patience, experience; and experience, hope:
[5] And hope maketh not ashamed; because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost which is given unto us.
[6] For when we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly.
A simpler response would be: why did Jesus have to die? If we're capable of becoming righteous on our own, there's no way God would have put His only begotten Son through that horrible experience.
What manner of "Christians" are these here at EvC who don't know this? What manner of "Christians" don't understand what sin is, and why men need to be forgiven? Have you people started your own cult? The honest thing would be to say so, if you have. It would also be more honest not to refer to yourselves as "Christians" if you're independent of Christ, and don't intend to obey and follow Him.
Luke 24: 45-47
[45] Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures,
[46] And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day:
[47] And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
Is this a secret?
John 6: 47-53
[47] Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life.
[48] I am that bread of life.
[49] Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead.
[50] This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die.
[51] I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.
[52] The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat?
[53] Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.
Is this so hard to understand?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 175 by purpledawn, posted 04-12-2007 3:35 PM purpledawn has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 207 by jar, posted 04-15-2007 6:52 PM CTD has replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 208 of 300 (395234)
04-15-2007 6:55 PM
Reply to: Message 205 by ringo
04-15-2007 5:36 PM


Ringo wrote:
There's a big difference between serving as a servant/slave and serving as a son/heir.
According to Ringo there is. According to the bible there isn't.
You're not paying attention. I've been saying throughout the entire thread that God does not want us to change from His children to His slaves. I'm the one who's saying there is no transition.
You're welcome to wish me inattentive. You're whole basis for this is what you imagine happened after the return of the prodigal son. We only know there was a party. The story ends before we find out whether the father stole his other son's rightful inheritance in order to reward the one which returned and allow him to live a life of leisure. A more realistic expectation would be for the father to hire the boy on, and maintain his other son's inheritance. But either way, what happened later is a matter of speculation.
And you imagine Christians to be too proud to call themselves servants if they can get around it. Serving God is a privilege in our eyes. We count each opportunity as a blessing (sometimes after the work is done, to be truthful). And asserting that God Himself desires this to be the case when He says exactly the opposite! You're not going to convince any of us.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 205 by ringo, posted 04-15-2007 5:36 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 210 by ringo, posted 04-15-2007 7:11 PM CTD has not replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 209 of 300 (395236)
04-15-2007 7:01 PM
Reply to: Message 207 by jar
04-15-2007 6:52 PM


Re: Mushing It All Together
Thanks for the clarification. As you appear to speak for the cult, what say you guys stop calling yourselves "Christians"?
Or is deception an indispensable element of your religion?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 207 by jar, posted 04-15-2007 6:52 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 211 by jar, posted 04-15-2007 7:27 PM CTD has not replied

CTD
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 253
Joined: 03-11-2007


Message 215 of 300 (395288)
04-15-2007 10:19 PM
Reply to: Message 212 by purpledawn
04-15-2007 9:09 PM


Re: Metaphorical Servant
This thread is about the teaching of surrendering (giving up) control of our lives to God, not the other meanings of surrender.
It is quite evident what this thread is really about, and it has nothing to do with learning what the scripture says.
EvC may define "Christian" as anyone who says they are. The bible says disciples were called Christians. People who contend against Jesus, God, and the bible on an intentional and continual basis are not disciples, not Christians and have no business claiming they are. They know they can't fool God, so they must have some motive for fooling men. The bible tells us who their master is.
I'm trying not to be hasty, but it begins to appear that this entire forum is a sham. If I don't find some threads which contain honest discussions, I don't see why I should waste my time here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 212 by purpledawn, posted 04-15-2007 9:09 PM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 218 by purpledawn, posted 04-16-2007 9:37 AM CTD has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024