Look, pal, any argument you make based on proteins or DNA is moot.
RNA was the first form of "life".
Here is the post to which I am referring:
Proteins. Simple proteins allow for cells to live. There are a specific 20 that are needed for DNA to be created. However, these 20 proteins are only created at the command of the DNA they produce. Assuming evolution is real, than at some time, there were neither, and now there are both. So, to start the cycle you need DNA, but DNA needs those 20 proteins, and those proteins need DNA. So, because both needs the other, one could logically conclude that there were either both or neither at the beginning of time (the big bang or 'God made the heavens and the earth'). And because there are both now, we must assume that both were created sometime between the beginning and now. Because of their mutual dependence on one another, both had to be created at the same time. Therefore, creation is the only likely solution.
Neither proteins nor DNA are necessary for an "RNA World".
Let me repeat this, since you seem hard-of-hearing:
PROTEIN AND DNA ARE IRRELELVANT.
Capiche?