Kent Hovind

There is evidence of natural causes.Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution.Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing.Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.It really is that simple.

So far the only evidence is that of natural causes.There is evidence of natural causes.Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution.Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing.Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.It really is that simple.

Worse than that.As I think I've pointed out to him there is evidence of Natural Causes which explain existence, law, order, purpose and the semblance of design but he has NEVER presented any evidence that there is some designer or any model of how that designer influences evolution.Frankly, Dawn Bertot's post are simply word salad at best.

You provided nothing as usual.So far the only evidence is that of natural causes.There is evidence of natural causes.Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution.Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing.Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.It really is that simple.

So far the only evidence is that of natural causes.There is evidence of natural causes.Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution. Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing.Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.It really is that simple.

So far the only evidence is that of natural causes.There is evidence of natural causes.No evidence has EVER been presented of any cause other than a natural cause.Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution or of some NOT NATURAL cause.Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing. Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.It really is that simple.

I think that there are actually two errors in there, first belief that a SOURCE is more important than CONTENT and that assertion carries weight.

Such events leave evidence Buz, and yes, that the Exodus is just myth has really pretty much been proven.And NO evidence has ever been presented that there ever was a land bridge.

There is evidence of natural causes.Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution.Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing.Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.It really is that simple.

There is evidence of natural causes.Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution.Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing.Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.It really is that simple.

There is evidence of natural causes.Please present the evidence of the creator or the method used by that critter to influence evolution.Until you present evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes you have nothing.Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.It really is that simple.

Kent Hovind is nothing but a criminal and con man.In addition there is evidence of natural causes.Until evidence equal to the evidence of natural causes is presented Creationism and Intelligent Design are nothing but legal maneuvers to sneak Christian Biblical Creationism into the schools.Since there is evidence that there are natural causes but no evidence of a creator or any method used by that critter to influence evolution logic demands that until such evidence is presented that the creator or the method used by that critter be simply disregarded.It really is that simple.