peepul writes:
This is one of the worst examples I have seen of dishonest quote mining. These folks are supposed to be Christian!
It is horribly dishonest, but I would argue that their Darwin quote mines are worse because of their intent. They are not just trying to show an 'evolutionist' admitting flaws in the theory but trying convince people that even the father of evolutionary biology was skeptical of his own theory.
And unfortunately being Christian doesn't seem to hinder this. I class the 'quote-miners' in different categories. The worst by far are the people who actually pour through the literature and take out the quotes. IMO, there ought to be a special place in hell for someone who deliberately refurbishes a sentence or paragraph to say the opposite of what the author intended.
The other categories are various level of ignorant. Some of these are completely unaware that quote mining is wrong, even when shown the original. They
sincerely believe that their source for the quote is honest, and simply can not see where anything is wrong. Others will acknowledge that that example may have been misunderstood but will go to the next, relying on an infinite series of "Maybe that was a bad example but this evolutionist said ...."
I am not sure what the issue is. Part of it, imo, lies in the RWA work of Altemeyer, Winter, and others. Where there is a measurable inability to see contradiction when the conclusion is a presupposition. Another portion might be hiding from the terrible thought that there could be good Christians out there who have been defrauding them. Admitting your source is a fraud is admitting you are a sucker. And that begs the question of what else you might believe that is equally fraudulent.
Doctor Bashir: "Of all the stories you told me, which were true and which weren't?"
Elim Garak: "My dear Doctor, they're all true"
Doctor Bashir: "Even the lies?"
Elim Garak: "Especially the lies"