Chariots of God (Scripture & Photo Examined)

If I remember correctly, "Soy" would be used for health, location, or condition.But it was a long time back!

Sounds like an evil Santa! You know, the naughty and nice bit.The rest of your post is wishful thinking and nonsense, or worse. Get a grip!

I have seen a number of private films of bigfoot, most of which have never been made public. I've also seen most of the well-known ones, some, like the Patterson film, viewing a 1st generation copy backwards and forwards for hours.I was not convinced.But based on your "orb" criteria, bigfoot exists.Who would have thought!!!???

The point of my post was that photographs don't make it as evidence. There are a lot of photographs of bigfoot, but that gets us nowhere.Now, if you drag back a body with lots of unique DNA and unique bones, then you have something to work with.All you have shown us so far is that your religious belief is coloring all that you see, and is leading you to believe things that have not been established by reliable evidence.At this point the physical evidence for bigfoot is far better than for your "orbs." For bigfoot we have lots of footprints, and even a handprint with dermal ridges. That's tangible evidence that you haven't matched. But even that evidence is far short of what is needed to establish the existence of bigfoot.

So you have nothing but belief then? Belief in fuzzy pictures that could be anything?Your evidence is far short of the evidence for bigfoot, and that is far from convincing.Seems like you have nothing but belief to back your claims. That and $2.50 will get you a cup of coffee in a cheap cafe.

Evidence rather than unsupported assertions and unsupported correlations would be a big help. Can you provide any?And no, scripture is not evidence...

Easy--test it against the real world. See how well it stands up.

And without being able to test your belief against the real world--against the evidence--all you have to go on is belief.How do you know your belief is accurate? (Other than belief???) When other believers have different beliefs, how do you discern which is correct? You're back to belief again, with no evidence against which to measure.Pretty sloppy way to run a universe...

That's wasn't a hamster! That was a gerbil!Hmmmm. Looks like we have a schism in this newly-found sect already.=====On a serious note, this illustrates the problem that people run into when they don't rely on evidence to decide between competing beliefs, and between those beliefs and the real world.But then you knew that...

So, by the standards you are using, this, all by itself, is absolute proof that bigfoot exists?

There's your problem right there--you "believe."I studied for several years in grad school under the only academic bigfoot expert in the US. I went on trips with him to see amateur films, and looked at all the evidence he had gathered over about 20 years of study.Even after seeing all that evidence I don't "believe" any of it. There is some interesting evidence, which has yet to be explained, but there is no "proof" that bigfoot exists. And belief doesn't enter the picture at all.Seems like you could profit from a healthy dose of skepticism and leave that belief stuff alone.

Broken links.Shy little guys, eh?

But Photoshop is real...

I could post dozens or maybe even hundreds of photographs of bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, and all sorts of other weird stuff. None of them are "proof" of the claims made.Likewise the dust motes and other Rorschach-test photographs you post are not "proof" of anything but your unwavering and unsupported belief in the supernatural.Your problem is that humans are hard-wired to see patterns where often they don't exist.The following hidden image shows that Rorshchach did not live in vain, and that you can't just assume random patterns have any meaning. (In keeping with this board's good taste, you have to do a "peek" to see it.)

You want to see a lot of high-end photographic equipment, look on the sidelines of any professional football game!Lots of other places the big lenses show up too. They're pretty common now--lots of good equipment out there.