Their interpretation is an appraisal of the best interim evidence, as they have stated.
Yours is invented, unevidenced denial.
Now, should we trust the full assessment of a study undertaken by scientists on behalf of the leading medical journal in this Country (The Lancet), or the desperate denials of a sad religious nutjob, who has no evidence to back up his sad mewling ?
As an intelligent man of decency, who knows a great many scientists and is aware of their intelligence, kindness and dedication to humanity, the answer is spectacularly obvious to me.
(The one plus I will give you is that you do at least provide some mild entertainment.)
Could there be any greater conceit, than for someone to believe that the universe has to be simple enough for them to be able to understand it ?