coded information in DNA

Precisely. Codes can be written in ink. DNA, on the other hand, is the ink. It is the chemical properties of DNA that matter. It is a catalyst, not an abstract code like that used by humans.To use another example, I can write this message in a number of fonts, font sizes, underlined, italicized, bolded, etc. You can not do this with DNA. You can not print out a line of A's, T's, C's, and G's on a microscopic typewriter, insert it into E. coli, and expect the corresponding protein to be produced. In the same way, I do not chemically react with a newspaper in order to read it.

Chemistry and physics do not work without the same type of code found in DNA. Those codes can be found in the spin, charge, and mass of particles and the orbitals of electrons. For example, the code for neon is:1s^2 2s^2 2p^6The code for a W boson is:Charge -1, Spin 1, Mass 80.4These are as much a code as DNA.

And I showed you what that symbolic code was. For neon it is 1s^2 2s^2 2p^6. For the W Boson it is Charge -1, Spin 1, Mass 80.4. Yes, they do. The electron orbital code specifies the chemical reactions it is planned for in the same way that DNA does. This orbital code specifies whether or not an atom will take or give up eletrons, and how easily this occurs. The electron code specifies the arrangement of atoms that it binds to.In fact, you can see the symbols here: PicThe quantum code found in particles specifies the plan for it's path through a cloud chamber and it's interactions with different fields.

Indeed.Another fact worth mentioning is DNA tertiary structure as it relates to DNA binding. A good example is the Arabinose operon. In this example two proteins bind to the DNA creating a loop in the DNA. This tertiary shape blocks access to the promoter.What happens when you fold a page of code? Nothing.

Then please define for us who is the encoder, the decoder, and the symbols that are used in a genetic system, and please show at what point an intelligence is observed as part of the system.

But you are taking it one step further. You are saying that no such mechanism exists. Surely you can see the difference, no? If you want to claim that no natural mechanism exists by which coded information can be produced then you need to show this. I don't envy the task.

But what happens when that code is duplicated and changed? Could new variation in the code give rise to new information? That is what happens in DNA, the code evolves without the intervention of intelligence. Really? Who observed the first DNA strand when it formed?Edited by Admin, : Fix quote.

According to your argument, as soon as we observe humans arranging pebbles then we must assume that all unknown arrangement of pebbles are also intelligently guided.