I'm not sure that your paper cited does what you imply it does.
Yep, that was my thought yesterday when I read it.
I didn't study the combinatorics in any detail, but they seemed to be quite thorough.
However, they do seem to be rather deluded... there is no need at all for their probability to be of order unity. And personally, I really do not see abiogensis occuring as this simultaneous ordered coming-togther of countless amino acids, so this kind of probability argument is totally useless IMO.
They can't even get their references correct. I find it quite hard to believe that Barrow and Tipler came out in 1994 when my prize winning essay based on their book was written in 1989
This message has been edited by cavediver, 11-08-2005 06:28 AM