Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 13/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution has been Disproven
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3672 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 265 of 301 (257664)
11-08-2005 6:25 AM
Reply to: Message 264 by RAZD
11-07-2005 9:30 PM


Re: Possibility of Abiogenesis
I'm not sure that your paper cited does what you imply it does.
Yep, that was my thought yesterday when I read it.
I didn't study the combinatorics in any detail, but they seemed to be quite thorough.
However, they do seem to be rather deluded... there is no need at all for their probability to be of order unity. And personally, I really do not see abiogensis occuring as this simultaneous ordered coming-togther of countless amino acids, so this kind of probability argument is totally useless IMO.
They can't even get their references correct. I find it quite hard to believe that Barrow and Tipler came out in 1994 when my prize winning essay based on their book was written in 1989
This message has been edited by cavediver, 11-08-2005 06:28 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 264 by RAZD, posted 11-07-2005 9:30 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 266 by RAZD, posted 11-08-2005 7:21 AM cavediver has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024