Evolution has been Disproven

It's a meaningless statement to anybody, but some people understand where it comes from. Juhrahnimo's referring to Borel's "Law". Borel's law is not a law, it's a rule of thumb, and the common creationist choice of 1 in 10⁵⁰ as a probability level which divides the possible from the essentially impossible is not supported by Borel's work or any science or mathematics. As you no doubt know, the choice of a probability level at which we ignore the possibility of some event happening depends on the situation.The latest practitioner of this claptrap is William Dembski with his "universal probability bound".A simple demonstration how sily any universal probablity bound is: take two decks of cards, shuffle them, and lay the cards out on a table in a line. The probability of the arrangement you are looking at, before you laid out the cards, was 1 in 10¹⁶⁶. But it happened. For more improbable events, add more decks of cards.Of course, this is a digression from the real point, which is that nobody thinks that left-handed amino acids came to be or joined to form proteins by chance; they did so in acordance with the laws of chemistry and the surrounding environment (catalytic surfacesa and the like). We don't yet have a good theory of how it happened, but "chance" isn't even in the runnning.

No, not really.Evolution is independent of how life came to be. Poofed into existence by the Judeo-Christian God, arising naturally from a bath of chemicals on the early Earth, seeded by aliens from another dimension, whatever ... it just doesn't matter. Evolution is about what happened after life came into existance.