The problem with EVC

Wrong. As much as "something out of nothing" is sufficiently ill-defined in layman's hands, this is part of active research. Was part of my active research. You may want to think that active theoretical research is no more valuable than the man-on-the-street's musings, but shall we compare track-records over the past century?Robin's use of the term "sci-fi babble" wrt to what I write I find highly offensive. He is in no position whatsoever to judge.

And so the ignorance continues...Tell me, when you need someone to service your bike, do you seek out someone with as little experience as possible with engineering to do your servicing? What, you do your servicing yourself? Why? Because you are so shit at engineering it seems the best way forward?

Robin, I haven't the heart to insult you, tempting as it is But neither have I the patience to discuss anything with you, especially given the mood you are in. If you have any serious questions based on anything I said in your thread, then I'll give them a shot...

I can't, no. Because I find my physics impinges on what I once thought was pure philosophy and/or theology.If we take the idea of God that you have been using: creator, ultimate being, etc, then it would hardly be sensible to consider that entity as constrained by internal properties of the creation. At least, that is an assumption I am making.When General Relativity tells me that time is merely an internal property of the universe, it leaves me with little choice than to consider this God as outside/unbound by what we call time.Physics places lower limits on this creator God's attributes.

Multiple message deletedEdited by cavediver, : Multiple message deleted

Multiple message deletedEdited by cavediver, : Multiple message deleted