Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The problem with EVC
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3992
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.5


Message 21 of 208 (312478)
05-16-2006 2:07 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Chiroptera
05-16-2006 1:59 PM


Re: Defending the format
And I would imagine that there have been times when you have come to a different understanding of subjects that you thought you knew cold when you have had to explain the concepts to others.
An early mentor always insisted to me that you don't really understand something until you can explain it to a bright child.
It's a pretty good test.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Chiroptera, posted 05-16-2006 1:59 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by iano, posted 05-16-2006 7:14 PM Omnivorous has replied

Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3992
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.5


Message 30 of 208 (312609)
05-16-2006 9:23 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by iano
05-16-2006 7:14 PM


Lake EvC
What do they recommend when the kid ain't all that bright?
All the children are above average.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by iano, posted 05-16-2006 7:14 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by iano, posted 05-16-2006 9:37 PM Omnivorous has not replied

Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3992
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.5


Message 75 of 208 (312936)
05-17-2006 4:13 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by Faith
05-17-2006 2:01 PM


Re: Logic
Faith writes:
But this is very very wrong of you. He is using the term "logic" in a completely valid way, the way anyone with a humanities education does, and for you guys to insist that he use it in your specific technical sense is quite unfair, and in fact a kind of snobbism, to use Robin's term. It makes conversation very difficult to insist on your narrow context when all you need do is recognize that it is a perfectly valid usage, and found in all dictionaries.
Hi, Faith.
This former English major and creative writing grad student qualifies as a product of several fine humanities programs. I took courses in logic as well as literature, history, philosophy, etc.
Logic and reason are not the special preserve of science or the liberal (conservative, now?) arts.
Shame on any liberal arts major who didn't tackle at least one term of basic logic and who doesn't understand that logic is a formal, rigorous method of thought; to say so is not to appeal to a "specific technical sense" but to recognize the essential meaning of the word.
True, many words are used casually with less or other than their full meaning.
Are we being casual here?
"That was quite an operation!" can be said about everything from military sorties to housecleaning, but in the hospital we take it as surgery.
Besides, can anyone of the Mr. Spock generation think logical is equivalent to reasonable?
When someone explains to me why something is logical, I expect logic, not reasonableness. There is much that is reasonable that is wrong--certainly our reasonable intuitions about time and space are wrong.
In casual conversation I might remark that Bush's plan to stop Islamist terrorism by invading Iraq and inflaming the entire Middle East isn't logical, by which I would mean it is unreasonably stupid.
This seems to me to be a case of "When in Rome...": in discussions about science, faith, and philosophy, requests for logic should elicit the full formal monty, not casual usage. I have seen requests "for the logic" that outline the formal structure sought--surely anyone reading that would realize that something more than reasonableness is being requested.
If communication was tripped up over the meaning of the word logic, the fall has been on all sides.
I'm sure we have our share of snobs at EvC but expecting closely stepped logic at a forum that tackles evolution, cosmology, religion and cosmogyny is not evidence for it.
P.S. Thanks for the CDs. I'll let you know what I think.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by Faith, posted 05-17-2006 2:01 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 78 by Faith, posted 05-17-2006 6:19 PM Omnivorous has not replied

Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3992
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.5


Message 76 of 208 (312940)
05-17-2006 4:15 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by iano
05-17-2006 4:01 PM


Tough
I'm sure Robin didn't come looking for a shoulder to cry on. Lucky for him!
love.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by iano, posted 05-17-2006 4:01 PM iano has not replied

Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3992
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.5


Message 186 of 208 (313677)
05-19-2006 8:15 PM
Reply to: Message 185 by robinrohan
05-19-2006 7:54 PM


"Contemptuous chuckles..."
I haven't had this much fun since Dark Shadows went off the air.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 185 by robinrohan, posted 05-19-2006 7:54 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 196 by robinrohan, posted 05-20-2006 9:10 AM Omnivorous has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024