Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The first 3 chapters of Genesis
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 48 of 307 (349423)
09-15-2006 6:02 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by ringo
09-15-2006 5:59 PM


So you think God says, "Well, Eve, you would have delivered your baby without pain, but now...."
Is that it?
Yes, of course. And there used be no thorns and thistles and now there are. It used be easy, but now it is hard. That's the obvious meaning here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by ringo, posted 09-15-2006 5:59 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by ringo, posted 09-15-2006 6:11 PM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 51 of 307 (349429)
09-15-2006 6:20 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by ringo
09-15-2006 6:11 PM


But that's just silly.
What kind of a "punishment" was it if Eve had nothing to compare it to? It's like telling a three-year-old, "I was going to let you drive the car, but now you'll have to wait for years and years and years."
Where's the punishment?
This is about the facts of the story. That's all it's about. The interpretations of the facts of the story by Jar and others are false. They are political in nature. This will not do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by ringo, posted 09-15-2006 6:11 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by ringo, posted 09-15-2006 6:25 PM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 55 by iano, posted 09-15-2006 6:38 PM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 57 of 307 (349439)
09-15-2006 6:42 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by jar
09-15-2006 6:25 PM


It goes on to explain the main things about life. It explains why snakes have no legs, why we fear and kill snakes, why childbirth seems more painful for humans than other animals, why people must farm instead of foraging like the other animals.
What a bunch of garbage this is. It's about man disobeying God and God punishing him for it. How more obvious can it get?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by jar, posted 09-15-2006 6:25 PM jar has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 58 of 307 (349440)
09-15-2006 6:43 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by iano
09-15-2006 6:38 PM


Re: Robin and Evolution
Your interaction of any substance (aside from a a quip or two here and there) in the Bible Study forum is limited to 4 occasions involving 4 people: Faith, Jaywill, Crevo and myself. A trinity of those happen to be Faith Aloners. The other...well he's has been shown to be just another lilly livered mark like you. The marks debating amongst themselves...sheesh!
What in the hell are you talking about?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by iano, posted 09-15-2006 6:38 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by iano, posted 09-15-2006 6:49 PM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 62 of 307 (349445)
09-15-2006 6:55 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by jar
09-15-2006 6:50 PM


In the case of Genesis the redactors place the newer tale first. It is a more sophisticated model than the older tale seen in Genesis 2. Why? Why not merge them together as they did in the other places?
IMHO the different pictures of God are what is important. Each one shows a facet of God, an important thing we need to understand, that GOD is both Transcendant and Personal, Distant and Near.
They presented the Transcendant GOD first, and then transition to the Personal GOD that walks with us, talks with us.
Yeah, we have all this bullshit, but, Jar, why were they punished? You said you did not say they were not punished. Assuming you are not a sophist, that means they were punished. Why?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by jar, posted 09-15-2006 6:50 PM jar has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 65 of 307 (349455)
09-15-2006 7:31 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by jar
09-15-2006 7:02 PM


They handled things different in other areas, the Flood myth includes at least two stories merged together, same with Exodus, but here, at the beginning they deal with the essence of the issue, with the very Nature of GOD. Here, they felt it so important that they included the two mutually exclusive stories, even though they could see the inconsistencies and conflicting character
Look at this nonsense. We are trying to come up with the facts of the literature, and we get this. We are trying to find out what happened in the story, but apparently this is troublesome. But it's obvious that Adam and Eve disobeyed God and were therefore punished.
Stop this sophistry. I know it does not fit with modern ideas, but that's not the point of this thread.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by jar, posted 09-15-2006 7:02 PM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by iano, posted 09-15-2006 7:40 PM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 68 by Clark, posted 09-15-2006 7:44 PM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 69 of 307 (349461)
09-15-2006 7:56 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by Clark
09-15-2006 7:44 PM


I don't have a problem with this either.
That's not the point. The point is that Adam and Eve disobeyed and were punished. Jar says this is non-sensical since A & E did not know right from wrong. But we are not talking about whether it is sensible or not, but only what the story relates.
And that is what the story relates.
Jar and others are trying to inject into the story what is not there---as they do with the New Testament. I can't think why. The only idea I have is that they want to hold on to the name of "Christian."
Is that it, Jar?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by Clark, posted 09-15-2006 7:44 PM Clark has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by Michael, posted 09-15-2006 8:04 PM robinrohan has replied
 Message 74 by ringo, posted 09-15-2006 8:20 PM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 71 of 307 (349467)
09-15-2006 8:06 PM
Reply to: Message 70 by Michael
09-15-2006 8:04 PM


The puzzle for me is why you spend thread upon thread trying to take the name "Christian" away from them.
Pleasure, pleasure--why does one do anything?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by Michael, posted 09-15-2006 8:04 PM Michael has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by Michael, posted 09-15-2006 8:13 PM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 73 of 307 (349471)
09-15-2006 8:16 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by Michael
09-15-2006 8:13 PM


You seem very strange and very silly.
How am I silly? Do you do nothing for pleasure?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Michael, posted 09-15-2006 8:13 PM Michael has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 76 of 307 (349474)
09-15-2006 8:25 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by ringo
09-15-2006 8:20 PM


You're the one who's injecting what isn't there: a fictitious world in which there is child-free childbirth and work-free gardening.
No, you are applying realism.
It's like saying there is no such thing as ghosts in regard to Hamlet.
But we are inquiring about the facts of the story.
Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by ringo, posted 09-15-2006 8:20 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by ringo, posted 09-15-2006 8:30 PM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 78 of 307 (349479)
09-15-2006 8:35 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by ringo
09-15-2006 8:30 PM


I'm not saying there is no child-free childbirth or work-free gardening. I'm saying they're not in the story. If you think they are, cite chapter and verse instead of just repeating, "It's obvious."
You must be the biggest damned fool I ever met in my life. So God said, everything is like it was before? No changes?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by ringo, posted 09-15-2006 8:30 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by ringo, posted 09-15-2006 8:36 PM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 82 by Faith, posted 09-15-2006 10:42 PM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 126 of 307 (349720)
09-17-2006 1:13 AM
Reply to: Message 125 by ReverendDG
09-17-2006 12:03 AM


they vary quite a bit, if you reread the wiki, they do have "original sin" but its nothing like luther had
Christianity makes no sense without the concept of the Fall and the Passion. That's why New Age Christianity is ridiculous.
Jar's religion is a joke. I'm trying to help him out by pointing that out.
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
AdminPD See Message 121.
Edited by AdminPD, : Off Topic Warning

This message is a reply to:
 Message 125 by ReverendDG, posted 09-17-2006 12:03 AM ReverendDG has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 127 by fallacycop, posted 09-17-2006 1:25 AM robinrohan has replied
 Message 131 by RickJB, posted 09-17-2006 3:02 AM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 128 of 307 (349723)
09-17-2006 1:28 AM
Reply to: Message 127 by fallacycop
09-17-2006 1:25 AM


Some would say that religion in general is a joke. I think that's is a point where reasonable people can disagree.
Real religion is no joke. it's a very serious matter.
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
AdminPD See Message 121.
Edited by AdminPD, : Off Topic Warning

"Your friends, if they can, may bury you with some distinction, and set up a monument, to let posterity see that your dust lies under such a stone; and when that is done, all is done. Your place is filled up by another, the world is just in the same state it was, you are blotted out of its sight, and as much forgotten by the world as if you had never belonged to it."--William Law

This message is a reply to:
 Message 127 by fallacycop, posted 09-17-2006 1:25 AM fallacycop has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 129 by fallacycop, posted 09-17-2006 1:39 AM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 130 of 307 (349725)
09-17-2006 1:41 AM
Reply to: Message 129 by fallacycop
09-17-2006 1:39 AM


I think that's what I said
I said real religion. Jar's religion is not real.
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
AdminPD See Message 121.
Edited by AdminPD, : OFf Topic Warning

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by fallacycop, posted 09-17-2006 1:39 AM fallacycop has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 132 by RickJB, posted 09-17-2006 3:10 AM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 133 by Brian, posted 09-17-2006 3:59 AM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 175 of 307 (349868)
09-17-2006 9:09 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by robinrohan
09-15-2006 4:46 PM


Re: Well, it starts as usual with Robin misrepresenting what has been said
The question was, why were Adam and EVe punished? Jar denied in another thread that they were punished due to the fact that they ate from the tree of KGE. I asked him why they were punished, and I get this:
Sorry robin but your reply is unrelated to the question I asked.
This is the sophistry I'm trying to expose.
Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by robinrohan, posted 09-15-2006 4:46 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 176 by robinrohan, posted 09-18-2006 11:03 PM robinrohan has replied
 Message 179 by AdminPD, posted 09-19-2006 12:22 PM robinrohan has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024