Discovery or Ignorance: The Choice Is yours?

Even most of your evolutionist friends would have a problem not believing that fission of uranium has been proven to a very high degree of accuracy, and will not be overturned by some new discovery tomorrow. If not, then you would rather live in a world where nothing is real or true. I noticed nothing followed the "Yes."In a world where there are some truths and absolutes, one must provide proven verifiable evidence that the speculations of the evloutionary model actually occurs, producing species after species, starting from single cells to fully developed creatures.

Those who believe and know our creator God get to explain what "intelligent design" is, not evolutionists. It is your choice to disbelieve if you so choose, but not your right to define what "intelligent design" is.Intelligent design is simply the belief/knowledge that our creator God, before anything was created, proceeded to intelligently design the universe and all life therein from the start to the finish. It is you who has been blinded by the god (Satan) of this world as to the truth of who Almighty God is.

Leaving aside how the first cell got here, so the evolutionary model has been proven in a laboratory from start-to-finish to a high degree of accuracy, where single cell creatures have been developed into fully developed creature/species, able to reproduce themselves and mutate to other species?Only on the National Geographic TV channel have I seen this done, not proven in a laboratory over time.Edited by John 10:10, : added a few words to the first sentence

We finally agree that ToE is a theory, not a fact.We will just have to disagree as to how "very valuable" it is.

True science results in facts that can then used understand life as it is, the universe, and how to take the facts and use them to develop things for the good of mankind. The problem comes in proclaiming the ToE as fact, not theory.Everyone is entitled to their own set of theories, but not to their own set of facts.

Most evolutionists these days consider it proven fact, not theory. "Very valuable scientists" who work in the field of biology deal with theories that result in proven facts, not in theories that can never be proven.

Science that is valuable does prove things to a high degree of accuracy. That's what facts are. Things that can never be proven, such as the ToE, produces nothing good in the study of biology, and in fact does much harm by convincing many school children and Nobel winners that the ToE is true science, when it is not.

Let's try again. You start with things as they are. You make predictions as to how things came to be as they are. You PROVE to a high degree of accuracy your predictions were correct. At this point there is no need to fold them back into more theories, and start over again. Your predictions that are proven to a high degree of accuracy are no longer theories but are facts, even laws or absolutes, and can be relied upon by scientists, engineers, doctors, etc. to create many other things for the good of mankind.Now do you get it?

Scientists who believe in their Creator do all manner of scientific research, just like scientists who do not believe in their Creator. The valuable scientists are those who prove their research endeavors to a high degree of accuracy, regardless of their Creator beliefs. Our Creator has given creative abilities to mankind. Many honor their Creator and give Him the glory for their creative abilities, while many do not.How is this a barrier to understanding and progress?

According to the story, the guppies that changed somewhat were still of the guppy species, and did not mutate into some other species altogether. That may be evolution as you know it, but it does not prove the ToE in any way, shape or form.

Like I said, most evolutionists believe the ToE is now fact, not theory. Just because you have warehouses full of fossils does not mean the ToE has been proven. Big difference between looking at fossils and proving they evolved from one life form to the first species, and then to millions of species.By your reasoning, how the first plant came into being and then mutated into millions of different plants must also be known fact? We will just have to disagree on what you and others believe true science is.You believe providing predictions of a start-to-finish evolutionary model is true science.I believe proving the predictions of a start-to-finish evolutionary model would be true science, if they could be proven. Since those who believe in the ToE cannot get around the time factor in order to prove the ToE, then the ToE cannot be called true science.

EVOLUTION = OPINION & THEORYYou observe by the fossil record what you think happened in the past, not the fact (proof) that it happened that way.

I'm saying that in order for the ToE to be proven to be true, you must be able to do this.Since you can't do this, the start-to-finish ToE predictions/theories are off limits to true scientific research.Scientific research that is valuable is research that can be done in the time frame in which we live, and can be proven to a high degree of accuracy within the time frame in which we live.

I won't even try to respond to such wisdom as this!

If you really believed this, you would also believe that He intelligently designed this universe and all life therein.