Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Condemn gay marriage, or just gay rape?
subbie
Member (Idle past 1284 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 11 of 573 (489930)
11-30-2008 10:44 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Peg
11-30-2008 10:37 PM


quote:
marriage by definition relates to male/female relationships
50 years ago, marriage by definition didn't include whites marrying nonwhites in most states. Why didn't they just come up with something different?

Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Peg, posted 11-30-2008 10:37 PM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by Peg, posted 11-30-2008 10:59 PM subbie has replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1284 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 16 of 573 (489939)
11-30-2008 11:04 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by Peg
11-30-2008 10:59 PM


quote:
the color of a persons skin wasnt an issue until the slave trade
So what? It was an issue in this country until the SCOTUS ended it, for reasons that are exactly parallel the issue of gay marriage. It's not clutching at straws, it's called arguing by analogy from precedent.

Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Peg, posted 11-30-2008 10:59 PM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Peg, posted 11-30-2008 11:10 PM subbie has replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1284 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 17 of 573 (489941)
11-30-2008 11:07 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Peg
11-30-2008 10:54 PM


Re: Fact over Fantasy
quote:
it does so in every nation on earth today
My emphasis.
quote:
keep it in context please.
You're going to have to explain to me how was anglagard said wasn't in exactly the same context as what you said.
Is it really that difficult for you to admit that you were wrong?
Edited by subbie, : Tyop

Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Peg, posted 11-30-2008 10:54 PM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Peg, posted 11-30-2008 11:14 PM subbie has replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1284 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 20 of 573 (489946)
11-30-2008 11:18 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by Peg
11-30-2008 11:10 PM


It in fact is precedent because it's an issue that the SCOTUS ruled on in 1967 in Loving v. Virginia. What happened in history and when racism became institutionalized is irrelevant. (And this is even assuming the truth of what you say, something I doubt very much.) SCOTUS declared interracial marriage unconstitutional as a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment under arguments that are identical in rationale to the arguments against gay marriage. You need to actually read the Loving decision to understand how and why.

Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Peg, posted 11-30-2008 11:10 PM Peg has not replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1284 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 21 of 573 (489947)
11-30-2008 11:21 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Peg
11-30-2008 11:14 PM


Re: Fact over Fantasy
You said:
quote:
it does so in every nation on earth today
My emphasis
Whether we were talking about traditional marriage in ancient times, the original institution of marriage, or how fun puppy dogs are to play with, your statement is factually wrong. Context has nothing to do with it.

Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Peg, posted 11-30-2008 11:14 PM Peg has not replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1284 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 44 of 573 (582203)
09-20-2010 10:34 AM
Reply to: Message 42 by jaywill
09-20-2010 10:13 AM


The matter of "I cannot help this because I was born this way" may also be appplied to stealing, lying, gossip, fornication, pickpocketing, bullying, extortioning, backbitting, embezzelment, adultery, drunkenness, gluttony ... etc.
First, no it can't.
Second, even if it could, that hardly makes them equivalent. What do all of your examples have in common that homosexuality doesn't? They all hurt someone else. Nobody else is affected in the least by someone being a homosexual.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by jaywill, posted 09-20-2010 10:13 AM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by jaywill, posted 09-20-2010 10:47 AM subbie has replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1284 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 46 of 573 (582207)
09-20-2010 10:54 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by jaywill
09-20-2010 10:47 AM


Not only can I make the argument that I ought to be able to steal because I was born with this strong tendency to do so.
You think that's equivalent to sexual orientation? Really?
Let me ask you this; could you ever choose to be sexually attracted to another man? I assume the answer is no. It's the same for homosexuality. Plus, while you can always "make the argument" that you were born with a strong tendency to do so, you'd be wrong.
I also can rationalize that my stealing hurts no one so it is not wrong.
Of course you can. That's because it is wrong, so it requires rationalization. On the other hand, homosexuality requires no rationalization because it doesn't hurt anyone else. Now do you understand?

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by jaywill, posted 09-20-2010 10:47 AM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by jar, posted 09-20-2010 11:25 AM subbie has seen this message but not replied
 Message 64 by jaywill, posted 09-20-2010 8:29 PM subbie has replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1284 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


(1)
Message 68 of 573 (582335)
09-20-2010 8:47 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by jaywill
09-20-2010 8:29 PM


I suppose you think that "abomination" means that it's really bad, maybe the worst thing one can do.
Not so.
First, "abomination" is a mistranslation. But don't take my word for it.
quote:
In fact, toevah is mostly about idolatry, and male homosexual behavior is only as abominable as remarriage or not keeping kosher. Whenever we use the word abomination we are perpetuating the misunderstanding of biblical text and the religious persecution of LGBT people.
Source
Second, if it were as offensive to the Christian god as you seem to think it is, why didn't Jesus ever say one word about it?
Perhaps your real problem with homosexuality isn't what the bible says about it, but how you feel about it. Think about that for a while.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by jaywill, posted 09-20-2010 8:29 PM jaywill has not replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1284 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 74 of 573 (582343)
09-20-2010 9:19 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by jaywill
09-20-2010 9:04 PM


Ah yes. The old "sin of Sodom" dodge. Nice try.
The sin of Sodom wasn't homosexuality, sexual depravity or sexual anything.
quote:
Your elder sister is Samaria, who lived with her daughters to the north of you; and your younger sister, who lived to the south of you, is Sodom with her daughters. You not only followed their ways, and acted according to their abominations; within a very little time you were more corrupt than they in all your ways. As I live, says the Lord GOD, your sister Sodom and her daughters have not done as you and your daughters have done. This was the guilt of your sister Sodom: she and her daughters had pride, excess of food and prosperous ease, but did not aid the poor and needy. They were haughty and did abominable things before me; therefore I removed them when I saw it.
Ezekiel 16:46-50
******
the Sodomites, overweeningly proud of their numbers and the extent of their wealth, showed themselves insolent to men and impious to the Divinity, insomuch that they no more remembered the benefits that they had received from him, hated foreigners and declined all intercourse with others. Indignant at this conduct, God accordingly resolved to chastise them for their arrogance...
Josephus, Antiquities I: 194-5
*****
The men of Sodom waxed haughty only on account of the good which the Holy One, blessed be He, had lavished upon them...They said: Since there cometh forth bread out of (our) earth, and it hath the dust of gold, why should we suffer wayfarers, who come to us only to deplete our wealth. Come, let us abolish the practice of travelling in our land...
There were four judges in Sodom named Shakrai (Liar), Shakurai (Awful Liar), Zayyafi (Forger), and Mazle Dina (Perverter of Justice). Now if a man assaulted his neighbour's wife and bruised her, they would say to the husband, Give her to him, that she may become pregnant for thee. If one cut off the ear of his neighbour's ass, they would order, Give it to him until it grows again.
If one wounded his neighbour they would say to the victim, Give him a fee for bleeding thee [bloodletting was sometimes considered medically beneficial in those days; Here the Sodomite judge cruelly ruled that if one beats you until you bleed, you owe your attacker money for this "beneficial" medical service"...]
... they had beds upon which travellers slept. If the guest was too long they shortened him by lopping off his feet; if too short, they stretched him out...
If a poor man happened to come there, every resident gave him a denar [coin], upon which he wrote his name, but no bread was given [the store owners recognized such coins, and refused toa accept them]. When he died, each came and took back his (denar)...
A certain maiden gave some bread to a poor man, hiding it in a pitcher. On the matter becoming known, they daubed her with honey and placed her on the parapet of the wall, and the bees came and consumed her. Thus it is written, And the Lord said, The cry of Sodom and Gomorrah, because it is great (rabbah): whereupon Rab Judah commented in Rab's name: on account of the maiden (ribah).
Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 109a
*****
Said R Levi, Even if I wanted to keep silent, the requirement of justice for a certain girl will not allow me to keep silent. There was the case of two girls, who went down to draw water from the well. One said to her friend, Why are you pale? The other said, All the food is gone from our house and we are ready to die. What did the other do? She filled the jug with flour and exchanged it for her own. Each took the one of the other. When the Sodomites found out about it, they took the girl (who had shared the food) and burned her. Said the Holy One, blessed be He, Even if I wanted to keep silent, the requirement of justice for a certain girl will not allow me to keep silent. What is written is not, 'In accord with their cry', but, 'according to her cry', referring in particular to the girl.
Genesis Rabbah, Parashah 49:6
*****
R Menhama in the name of R Bibi: This is what the Sodomites had stipulated among themselves. They said, As to any wayfarer who comes here, we shall have sexual relations with him and take away his money.
Genesis Rabbah, Parashah 50:7
*****
Rabbi Ze era said: The men of Sodom were the wealthy men of prosperity, on account of the good and fruitful land whereon they dwelt... Rabbi Nathaniel said: The men of Sodom had no consideration for the honour of their Owner by not distributing food to the wayfarer and stranger, but they even fenced in all the trees on top above their fruit so that so that they should not be seized; not even by the bird of heaven... Rabbi Joshua... said: They appointed over themselves judges who were lying judges, and they oppressed every wayfarer and stranger who entered Sodom by their perverse judgment, and they sent them forth naked...
Rabbi Jehudah said: They made a proclamation in Sodom saying: Everyone who strengthens the hand of the poor or the needy with a loaf of bread shall be burnt by fire. Peletith, daughter of Lot, was wedded to one of the magnates of Sodom. She saw a certain very poor man in the street of the city, and her soul was grieved on his account... Every day when she went out to draw water she put in her bucket all sorts of provisions from her home, and she fed that poor man. The men of Sodom said: How does this poor man live? When they ascertained the facts, they brought her forth to be burnt by fire. She said: Sovereign of all the worlds! maintain my right and my cause (at the hands of) the men of Sodom. And her cry ascended before the Throne of Glory. In that hour the Holy One, blessed be He, said: I will now descend and I will see whether the men of Sodom have done according to the cry of this young woman, I will turn her foundation upwards, and the surface thereof shall be turned downwards.
Pirke de Rabbi Eliezer
*****
Nachmanides commenting on the verse "AND WE SHALL KNOW THEM".
Their intention was to stop people from coming among them, as our rabbis have said, for they thought that because of the excellence of their land... many will come there and they despised charity... they continued provoking and rebelling against Him with their ease and the oppression of the poor... In the opinion of our Rabbis, all evil practices were rampant among them. Yet their fate was sealed because of this sin - i.e. they did not strengthen the hand of the poor and needy - since this sin represented their usual behaviour more than any other. Besides, since all peoples act righteously towards their friends and their poor, there was none among all the nations who matched Sodom in cruelty.
Nahmanides (Ramban) Commentary on Genesis, 13th century
Source
Now. does that sound more to you like homosexuals, or the religious right, who fight against state-sponsored welfare almost as much as they do against homosexuality?

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by jaywill, posted 09-20-2010 9:04 PM jaywill has not replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1284 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 78 of 573 (582349)
09-20-2010 9:55 PM
Reply to: Message 76 by jaywill
09-20-2010 9:32 PM


Let's take a closer look at what Jesus said about Sodom and Gomorrah. Here are the two lines you quoted in a fuller context:
quote:
Whatever town or village you enter, search for some worthy person there and stay at his house until you leave. As you enter the home, give it your greeting. If the home is deserving, let your peace rest on it; if it is not, let your peace return to you. If anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, shake the dust off your feet when you leave that home or town. I tell you the truth, it will be more bearable for Sodom and Gomorrah on the day of judgment than for that town. I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.
He is talking to his disciples, giving them instructions. His reference to Sodom and Gomorrah is in the context of explaining what will happen to towns that do not receive his disciples well. He makes no reference whatsoever to any sort of sexual activity.
That's your evidence that Jesus disapproved of homosexuality? Color me unimpressed.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by jaywill, posted 09-20-2010 9:32 PM jaywill has not replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1284 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 81 of 573 (582355)
09-20-2010 10:28 PM
Reply to: Message 79 by jaywill
09-20-2010 10:07 PM


jaywill writes:
At the moment I would only say that these reasons are not enough for me to remove the impact of thier homosexual activity as an offense and rebellion against God.
It is quite true that other errors may have provided the atmosphere and backround for thier homosexual sins to ferment. And it is true that latter in Scripture some of those sins were mentioned by God.
I cannot seriously use those passages to soften the effect of what Genesis says. God went to see of the actions of revolt against God were as seriouse as their cries against heaven indicated.
I think this revolting cry up to heaven of Sodom involved thier rejection of nature's normal way of sexual attraction and activity. That is the way the Genesis story reads to me.
They shook their fists against God concerning what THEY craved for in the realm of sexual pleasure.
But you are right that latter the Scripture does mention the sin of their pride and complacency. Often very proud and idle people who have too much thinking to do invent evil things.
This sounds to me like you're more interested in reading into the scripture what you want to be there, rather than reading what it says and trying to understand the message that it is sending.
Consider this question very carefully, and not just as a rhetorical device I'm employing to win an argument, but as a genuine question about something that doesn't make sense: Why did Jesus never say anything against homosexuality? Why did he refer to Sodom and Gomorrah only in the context of discussing how to treat strangers? To me, this provides compelling evidence of what he thought the lesson of Sodom and Gomorrah was.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by jaywill, posted 09-20-2010 10:07 PM jaywill has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024