|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 5624 days) Posts: 239 From: Upper Portion, Left Coast, United States Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Condemn gay marriage, or just gay rape? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
I also lost a younger brother to HIV related complications due most likely to his involvement in the gay community in San Fransisco. He died because of the gay lifestyle. HIV is a gay disease? Tell that to the children with HIV/AIDS in South Africa I am going to see next month. At ten years old I don't think gay is something they even know about. In lots of the world HIV is a very heterosexual disease. Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given. Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jaywill Member (Idle past 1969 days) Posts: 4519 From: VA USA Joined: |
HIV is a gay disease? Tell that to the children with HIV/AIDS in South Africa I am going to see next month. At ten years old I don't think gay is something they even know about. In lots of the world HIV is a very heterosexual disease. Can you quote me where I said "HIV is a gay disease"? I don't think I wrote that. Now if you wish to jump to the conclusion that I think that that is your business. However, if you examined my post, I not only mentioned HIV complication which led to my brother's death, BUT I mentioned the contributing circumstances. He was deeply involved in the gay community in San Fransisco. Not the usage of dirty needles or any other source of the HIV. In his case it was participation in the gay community. You should not jump to conclusions so easily. I know that there are other sources of the infection.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
hooah212002 Member (Idle past 829 days) Posts: 3193 Joined: |
In his case it was participation in the gay community. No, you ignoramus. It was UNPROTECTED SEX. YOU are just as susceptible to HIV if you have unprotected sex with random partners. It was your equation of the two that led to the assumption that you think HIV/AIDS is a gay disease. Perhaps you should find out why the disease is more prevalent in the homosexual community (hint: it isn't because they are gay). "What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof."-Hitch.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jaywill Member (Idle past 1969 days) Posts: 4519 From: VA USA Joined: |
You think that's equivalent to sexual orientation? Really? What do you expect me to do with this kind of passage ?
"If there is a man who lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination ..." (Leviticus 20:13) Even if I take a pen and change it and make it say whatever you would like it to say, somehow my conscience still says that that for a man to have sex with a man is "an abomination."
Let me ask you this; could you ever choose to be sexually attracted to another man? Sure. I recall a certain stage of puberty when I was infatuated with another boy. I suspect that may be a stage that young men and women pass through. Now I am not a psychologist. But at present, my opinion is that homosexuality is perhaps some kind of arrested psychological development. But notice that the Levitical passage talked about a man lying with a man as with a woman. So I think it is being carried away in the imagination to perform the sex act which is the most abominable to God. It could be argued that David and Johnathan seemed to have something very intimate psychologically between them. The Bible says that Johnathan loved David as his own soul. Yet we do not see them trying to have sex with one another. Now in the New Testament what Paul lists along with other "works of the flesh" includes homosexuality. He does not explicitly mention a man lying with a man or a woman lying with a woman. I conclude at this time that even the orientation is a work of what Pauls says are "the lawless and unruly ... ungodly and sinners ... unholy and profane" "And know this, that the law is not enacted for a righteous man but for the lawless and unruly, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who strike their fathers and those who strike their mothers, for murders, for fornicatiors, homosexuals, kidnappers, liars, perjurers, and whatever other thing that is opposed to the healthy teaching according to gospel of the glory of the blessed God, with which I was entrusted." (1 Tim. 1:9-11) The sin of homosexuality is listed along with other common sins there. We need to be saved from all of these damaging "orientations" through Jesus Christ.
I also can rationalize that my stealing hurts no one so it is not wrong. Of course you can. That's because it is wrong, so it requires rationalization. On the other hand, homosexuality requires no rationalization because it doesn't hurt anyone else. Now do you understand? This is an issue of whether or not one regards the Bible as the word of God or not. The issue really is - Does a person want to take the Bible as the word of God or reject it as simply human opinion ? If you take it as the word of God then you should see that homosexual orientation is something men and women need Christ for a salvation from. And one should see that male on male sex is an abomination to God. The Apostle Paul in reviewing the decline of early mankind includes also this - "Therefore God gave them up to passions of dishonor; for their females exchanged the natral use for that which is contrary to nature; males, leaving the natural use of the female exchanged t he natural use for that which is contrary to nature..." (See Romans 1:24-27) He does not leave us there. He goes on to speak of the forgiveness of God in the redemption of Christ. And he goes on to elaborate on the freeing power of the indwelling Christ for sanctification. It would be a tradedy if the word of God left us with only condemnation. Thankfully it is far from doing that. And if I WERE carried away by homosexual orientation and wanted to follow the Lord Jesus, it would be on His salvation work that I would be putting my focus on. Edited by jaywill, : No reason given. Edited by jaywill, : No reason given. Edited by jaywill, : No reason given. Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Modulous Member Posts: 7801 From: Manchester, UK Joined: |
No, you ignoramus. It was UNPROTECTED SEX. Sorry for the off topic continuation but I'd say it was ignorance and prejudice that killed him. Now the ignorance is gone, gay people are more inclined towards protecting themselves.
Perhaps you should find out why the disease is more prevalent in the homosexual community (hint: it isn't because they are gay). It should also be noted that if it was a gay sister rather than a gay brother, this ignorance probably wouldn't have had such a tragic ending.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
hooah212002 Member (Idle past 829 days) Posts: 3193 Joined: |
It should also be noted that if it was a gay sister rather than a gay brother, this ignorance probably wouldn't have had such a tragic ending. Yes. I should have qualified that statement indicating the MALE homosexual community. "What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof."-Hitch.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
hooah212002 Member (Idle past 829 days) Posts: 3193 Joined: |
So you are against homosexuality strictly because the bible says so? You have NO other argument against it? So the equation of harm to others (when you mentioned theft) is a moot point now?
IF that is indeed the case, who are you to tell people of a different faith (or a lack thereof) whether or not they can enter into a civil union? That argument really is akin to a muslim dictating to you that you cannot eat pork. "What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof."-Hitch.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
subbie Member (Idle past 1283 days) Posts: 3509 Joined:
|
I suppose you think that "abomination" means that it's really bad, maybe the worst thing one can do.
Not so. First, "abomination" is a mistranslation. But don't take my word for it.
quote: Source Second, if it were as offensive to the Christian god as you seem to think it is, why didn't Jesus ever say one word about it? Perhaps your real problem with homosexuality isn't what the bible says about it, but how you feel about it. Think about that for a while. Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate ...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
Can you quote me where I said "HIV is a gay disease"?
You very much insinuated it. The question you purported to answer was this.
So, how is it possible for a homosexual person to harm someone ( a third party) by entering into a union with another homosexual person? What harm do homosexual couples cause you, or anyone else for inbkthat matter?
Instead of answering this you went on a diatribe about HIV/AIDS. You are saying that unions between homosexuals is harmful because it causes AIDS. Why would you bring it up if that isn;t the answer.Are you ok with lesbians? I don't think there is much of a problem with HIV in the "lesbian community". Participating in the gay community did not cause his death. My cousin died of AIDS. She contracted it from her loser husband that had lots of unprotected sex. Last I heard he is still alive, but she died. It had nothing to do with homosexuality. There are lots of people involved in the gay community in San Francisco that do not have HIV and AIDS. I would venture to bet a lot of them practice safe sex, Just like a lot of heterosexual people. Anyone not practicing safe sex is vulnerable. The gay community is not responsible for your brothers death. He is. Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 422 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
So if you happen to think that homosexual behavior is a sin, then don't participate in homosexual activities. But frankly, it is none of you business if others participate in homosexual activities.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jaywill Member (Idle past 1969 days) Posts: 4519 From: VA USA Joined: |
Being gay is physically destructive? You're going to have to explain that one to me. The anus, for example, was not designed for the male phallus to be jamed up into it. This can damage the anus. And AIDS can kill you. No, I did not say only gay people get AIDS. I said AIDS can kill you. And AIDS can be contracted because of homosexual practices. Now I am surprised that you needed me to spell this out. And here are the responses I am not expecting from you or some other objector: 1.) Some Phd. has now announced that male on male intercourse cannot be a source of the AIDS disease. 2.) Heterosexual sex can also be physcially damaging to the body. So that makes homosexuality alright. Maybe you will surprise me with some other rational or justification. But this is the Bible Study Room. And I think the issue is what does the Bible teach about it? And some of us here regard the Bible as the divine revelation of God to man. Now one more matter I'd cover in this post. Some would say that Jesus NEVER spoke against homosexuality as Paul did. Well, this is not quite true. Jesus does mention the judgment of Sodom - He speaks of both the judgment of Sodom in the Old Testament and thier possible standing in the last Judgment. He therefore must have taken the Genesis account of Sodom's sins seriously. Notice also that Jesus said that to reject Himself would be less tolerable then the sin of Sodom. So the real issue is what will the sinner do with Jesus Christ.
"And whoever does not receive you nor hear your words, as you go out of that house or city, shake off the dust from your feet. Truly I say to you, It will be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrah in the day of judgment than for that city." (Matt. 10:14,15) My purpose in refering to this verse is not to say the sins of Sodom were OK. But rather that in the total scheme of things what one does with the message of Christ the Savior and Son of God is more serious. Edited by jaywill, : No reason given. Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jaywill Member (Idle past 1969 days) Posts: 4519 From: VA USA Joined: |
So if you happen to think that homosexual behavior is a sin, then don't participate in homosexual activities. But frankly, it is none of you business if others participate in homosexual activities. It seems that you are mad with me for studying the Bible here with you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
jaywill writes:
I think you should treat it like this one:
What do you expect me to do with this kind of passage ? "If there is a man who lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination ..." (Leviticus 20:13) quote: "It appears that many of you turn to Hebrew to escape the English...." -- Joseppi
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
subbie Member (Idle past 1283 days) Posts: 3509 Joined: |
Ah yes. The old "sin of Sodom" dodge. Nice try.
The sin of Sodom wasn't homosexuality, sexual depravity or sexual anything.
quote: Source Now. does that sound more to you like homosexuals, or the religious right, who fight against state-sponsored welfare almost as much as they do against homosexuality? Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate ...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 422 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined:
|
Not at all. I cannot conceive of a way you could make me mad.
I'm just pointing out the facts. I see no real problem pointing out that Paul in particular was pretty often an ass. But we were given the great Gift of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. It's up to each of us to use that knowledge and just as we are instructed to question and challenge God himself when he is wrong, we should certainly question Paul. In addition, sins are only relevant between an individual and God; it is of no value, relevance or purpose to anyone else. Homosexuality is certainly something that is no ones business but the parties involved. Marriage is a social contract and certainly not something that requires religious input. If your particular chapter of Club Christian is opposed to homosexuality, then don't participate in homosexual practices. If your particular chapter of Club Christian is opposed to same sex marriages, then don't perform same sex marriages. But you have no say in establishing what the terms of that social contract will be. But it is not a matter of what the Bible says, it is a matter of how YOUR chapter of Club Christian interprets what the Bible says. It is not what GOD says, it is what you claim God says. Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024