Chariots of God (Scripture & Photo Examined)

And your evidence to support that is ...?Maybe you can provide some evidence for your other assertions or that the pictures show more than just dust and poor processing at the same time.

You really don't have a clue what evidence is do you?Eye witness reports are about the weakest possible evidence and even then are not evidence that what was seen was real or some spiritual chariot.Do you have any evidence that anything seen is not just dust or fantasy?

Sorry but those photographs have not baffled anyone that is not delusional, willfully ignorant or just trying to con someone.Again, where is your evidence that there are any chariots shown in any of the pictures?

Only if you want to claim God actually exists.If you want to just claim that you believe in God or you believe there are chariots without any claim that your beliefs are more than just personal belief you can get away without any evidence. If though you want to claim actual existence of God or that there really are chariots shown in the photos then yes, of course evidence is needed and pretty strong evidence.

God can most definitely be seen through the eyes of ignorance; the evidence of that is overwhelming.But so far you have never even tried to present any evidence.Or is there some reason for that?Edited by jar, : appalin spallin

If you presented a picture that you claimed was me it would be reasonable to ask you to present evidence it really is of me, particularly if others looking at the picture could not discern that it was me.When folk look at the picture you claim is of me and say "That's not jar, not even a person but just dust out of focus" then evidence to support your assertion is definitely required.The problem here is that you have presented NO evidence to support your claim, only fantasy and assertion.Sorry Charlie, you've got nothing.

Silly rabbit.But I do see the photographs.What no one has seen is any evidence that the photographs show what you claim they show.Where is the evidence that there are chariots and spirits in the photographs?It really is that simple.Where is the evidence?If you presented a picture that you claimed was me it would be reasonable to ask you to present evidence it really is of me, particularly if others looking at the picture could not discern that it was me.When folk look at the picture you claim is of me and say "That's not jar, not even a person but just dust out of focus" then evidence to support your assertion is definitely required.The problem here is that you have presented NO evidence to support your claim, only fantasy and assertion.

I do have eyes but see neither a spirit nor a round chariot.Where is your evidence that there is a spirit or round chariot in the picture?

That depends on which version of the story you consider. In reality that story changed and got expanded and evolved with each retelling.Have you ever actually read the Bible?

Yet you never offer any evidence that anything you have shown is not "of this world".

Again, so you say, but you offer no evidence to support what you claim.

Again, you provide absolutely no evidence or support for your assertion that "This is a photograph of a spirit in a small chariot of God." or that "This is a photograph of the Holy Spirit.".Sorry but so far all you have presented is fantasy.

You keep saying stuff like that but offer no evidence that either photograph shows what you claim.Why should anyone believe the nonsense you try to market?

Too funny.I notice Jesus has not claimed that that "This is a photograph of a spirit in a small chariot of God." or that "This is a photograph of the Holy Spirit."Maybe you need to stop posting such nonsense.

So you keep claiming.Yet you have never provided any evidence to support your assertions that "This is a photograph of a spirit in a small chariot of God." or that "This is a photograph of the Holy Spirit."Sorry but no matter how many times you post nonsense it is still just nonsense.