Summations Only

I didn't say it is an atheist site.
Evolution is an atheist invention, so any non-religious site dedicated to evolution is likely to be dominated by atheists ... just as evolutionary biology is dominated by atheists.Edited by Dredge, : No reason given.

No, it's no strange at all for Catholics to differ on points of science. And what Church leaders think about any point of science is irrelevant to the faith. If a Pope supports evolution, other Catholics are not obliged to share his opinion. And a Catholic can believe that the Sun revolves around the earth, for example, if he wants to. Getting science wrong is not considered a sin. The bottom line is, a Catholic can believe anything as long as it doesn't compromise the doctrines, teachings and dogmas of the Church.The Bible is not a book of science and the Catholic Church is not a science club. I can't think of any science that a Catholic is obliged to believe. In fact, the dogmas that a Catholic must believe are decidedly un-scientific ... the Resurrection, Transubstantiation, the Virgin Birth, the Trinity, etc, etc.Edited by Dredge, : No reason given.Edited by Dredge, : No reason given.

Huh? I'm saying anyone who accepts evolution is wrong - theists included. BioLogos and Talk Origins are both wrong.Edited by Dredge, : No reason given.Edited by Dredge, : No reason given.

Creationists believe that such evidence exists. I didn't see how the four faces on Mount Rushmore were brought into existence, but I can be secure in my deduction that humans must have done it.

I didn't say Talk Origins is an atheist web site; it is devoted to promoting the science of evolution, which I interpret as atheist theology. If Talk Origins mentioned somewhere that it is devoted to promoting atheism, then I would say it is an atheist site. Talk Origins presents itself as philosophically neutral, but I'll bet it is run almost-exclusively by atheists.BioLogos, on the other hand, endorses evolution, but also states that it endorses Christianity. So BioLogos is not philosophically neutral; it's a Christian web site (albeit, in error).

Right.
But since a human is more functionally complex than a chimp, it stands to reason that building a human would require more genetic information that building a chimp.Think of the instruction manual to build a mouse trap verses the instruction manual to build a car. Which instruction manual would contain more information?Edited by Dredge, : No reason given.Edited by Dredge, : No reason given.

I don't recall rejecting science. I love science! It's called faith. I have it and you don't. "Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except you eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, you have no life in you." - John 6:53.And there's an old saying: Truth is stranger than fiction.

I do understand the basics. I don't have to have a doctorate in mathematics to know that 1+1 don't add up to 3. Plus there is my intuition for smelling b.s.

Consensus is not an infallible guide to truth. Do you (think) I might be retarded?Nevertheless, the Holy Spirit won't allow me to accept evolution. "What harmony is there between Christ and Belial?" - 2Corinthians 6:15Edited by Dredge, : No reason given.

You're probably thinking of space shuttles and the Large Hadron Collider. No, I think you'll find that humans built those machines, not chimps.What can chimps do that humans can't? My fragile, egg-shell mind can't think of anything.

Charles Darwin wrote the first science-fiction novel. If he were alive today he would be astonished that so many people have taken the contents of Origin seriously!

For some reason, some words from a Supertramp song come to mind: "Dreamer; you're nothing but a dreamer."

Hey, come to think of it, chimps beat humans into space, didn't they? And I'm pretty sure a chimp in England invented the first computer. Oh, and let's not forget that even though the Hubble Space Telescope was put into space by humans, it was actually designed and built by a team of chimps.

"I didn't say Talk Origins is an atheist web site.""I wouldn't worry about anything from that discredited atheist web site." Huh? The first quote is mine but the second quote belongs to CRR. But thank you for confusing me with the redoubtable CRR - that's a compliment.--------------------------------------------------Talk Origins is officially philosophically neutral, but un-officially atheistic.

Since I wrote, "Do you I might be retarded?", then I may well be retarded. But "Do you think I might be retarded?" sounds less retarded. ------------------------------------My religious views don't hold me back - by rejecting evolution I am missing out on exactly nothing, as far as science is concerned. This is due to the mathematical principle: evolution = zero. Edited by Dredge, : No reason given.Edited by Dredge, : No reason given.