Report discussion problems here: No.2

This looks like spam too:http://EvC Forum: Evolution National Standards Change.org idea -->EvC Forum: Evolution National Standards Change.org ideaI looked at the linked website and it's spam to me.Edited by CosmicChimp, : No reason given.

Although the future course of a forum member named seekingfirstthekingdom, lies mostly within his own hands; I would very much like to see a further great bending of the accepted standards of conduct on this board exercised in relation to these initial posts of his. First of all, his post number 227 on the thread titled: "What i can't understand about evolution...." Shows to me quite clearly the only thing of substance or value he has stated to date. Next, it shows quite clearly that he has an honorable purpose here on these excellent pages. I see a genuine interest in that post despite all of his previous drivel.I would very much like the chance to see real growth on his part. Growth that is, besides the excellent company here, one of the greater joys I garner from this forum. Besides it's damn boring without a Creationist. I've come light-years, in my own search, responding to Creationists.He's gone to the library and checked out Dawkin's latest and best book. I want to see how he comes to understand the stuff in it.Edited by Adminnemooseus, : In the link, changed the "m=201#227" part to "m=227#227". Since not all member page setups have messages 201 and 227 on the same page, things work best when those two numbers are the same.

google paullesq and you can see he gets kicked out of a few forums for the same BS topic he has running here...

Bolder-Dash is not staying on topic. It is so full of junk that I am barely able to get through his last post. I'm "invested" in that thread and want no further part in his idiocy about issues completely off topic. In other words it would be nice to just inform him about his question and not have to write an entire book of biology out to him in a response.