Re: Cretaceous dinosaur fossils in area that was underwater for the whole time period
Not because of any failure of the geologists but because the Flood would naturally contradict many of the supposed depositional environments. But I need to do a much better job of thinking it all through than I've done lately. Bad case of brain fog.
No Faith, it is not that you are not thinking hard enough. Give yourself a break. At least tens of thousands of geologists have done thinking for you. They are not out to disprove the Bible - most likely nothing even remotely religious has occurred to them while doing what they have been trained to do. That is also one of your problems - you lack even the basic training to be able to decipher rocks and strata not to mention the ability to form hypotheses. By doing what you do you spit on universities, you spit on honest scientists passing their knowledge on the younger generation and you spit on scientific integrity.
It just is not so that you alone hold some kind of philosopher's stone regarding the origins of earth and everyone else is deceited and wrong.
I really kinda honour you for effort but you are just so dead wrong that it is not even funny.
How do you explain that my country is 100 percent void of fossils and has one of the oldest lithography? There is absolutely no frikking way that what can be seen is just thousands of years old - thousands of millions is what is reality.
What I meant was that funnily enough there are no fossils in here - exactly as mainstream paleontology would suggest. 2 Byo rocks and an ice-age 11000-9000 years ago - strata and landscape to match that.
My questions have nothing to do with the Flood. That's a figment of YOUR imagination. The questions come from pondering the strata and the geological interpretations thereof, which I find laughable. The only role the Flood plays in that is freeing me from those ideas.
That is IMO your biggest problem - without training to be able to read rocks you're throwing wild assumptions. Just like pathologists are able to read tissues and tell whether it's tumor or just a cyst, geologists are able to tell the origins and ages of rocks and what else - make predictions that the evidence either supports or not. There is no centuries-long conspiracy of doing academic work just to prove the Bible wrong. It is just silly to even think that.