Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9161 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,585 Year: 2,842/9,624 Month: 687/1,588 Week: 93/229 Day: 4/61 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Did the Flood really happen?
Larni
Member (Idle past 154 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(4)
Message 34 of 2370 (857170)
07-06-2019 10:56 AM
Reply to: Message 24 by Faith
07-06-2019 9:50 AM


Re: By Faith from
Hold on, where in the Bible does it say there was an ice age?

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Faith, posted 07-06-2019 9:50 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by Faith, posted 07-06-2019 11:01 AM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 154 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 47 of 2370 (857218)
07-06-2019 4:47 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by Faith
07-06-2019 11:01 AM


Re: By Faith from
But how could the temperature drop so suddenly?
Hello by the way, long time no see.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Faith, posted 07-06-2019 11:01 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by jar, posted 07-06-2019 5:35 PM Larni has not replied
 Message 51 by Faith, posted 07-06-2019 7:14 PM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 154 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 54 of 2370 (857234)
07-06-2019 8:00 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by Faith
07-06-2019 7:14 PM


Re: By Faith from
He turned four this April! He’ll be starting reception in September and has his little school uniform all ready.
My wife and I are camping with him in our back garden as I type (it’s nearly 1 am here) and he’s snoring softly, lol!

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Faith, posted 07-06-2019 7:14 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by Faith, posted 07-07-2019 1:56 AM Larni has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 154 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 2090 of 2370 (880676)
08-09-2020 11:01 AM
Reply to: Message 1738 by dad
07-04-2020 1:34 PM


Re: the world that then was
Are you the 'dad' who posts on ChristianForums?

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1738 by dad, posted 07-04-2020 1:34 PM dad has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 2093 by Juvenissun, posted 08-09-2020 11:25 AM Larni has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024