Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationism/ID as Science
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2543 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 233 of 249 (346315)
09-03-2006 11:19 PM
Reply to: Message 232 by inkorrekt
09-03-2006 11:06 PM


Re: Selective blindness
When it comes to proteins, that's a given. No duh we're related. Proteins are coded by DNA. Those animals with proteins closer in structure (the amino acid order and possibly folding) are more closely related to us. why? The closer the DNA, the closer the proteins will be.
Peptides, which I believe you are using for the term amino acid (if not, then you refer to peptide bond, the bond between two amino acids, or polypeptide, which is a chain of amino acids), are also based off of DNA. AAA, TTT, CCC, GGG are four amino acids. everyliving thing on this planet uses these bases (except in RNA, where the T is replaced with U). amino acids won't prove relatedness except for the fact that we all have DNA.
Basically, the answer to your question, though, is yes.
abe:
the reason water can't prove any relatedness is because it is not derived from DNA.
Edited by kuresu, : No reason given.

All a man's knowledge comes from his experiences

This message is a reply to:
 Message 232 by inkorrekt, posted 09-03-2006 11:06 PM inkorrekt has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024