Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,877 Year: 4,134/9,624 Month: 1,005/974 Week: 332/286 Day: 53/40 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationism/ID as Science
mjfloresta
Member (Idle past 6021 days)
Posts: 277
From: N.Y.
Joined: 06-08-2006


Message 188 of 249 (345332)
08-31-2006 1:56 AM
Reply to: Message 187 by fallacycop
08-31-2006 1:34 AM


ROFL!!
I would argue that the more complex something is, the harder it becomes to believe that it may have been designed and the bigger gets the likelyhood that it is a result of some natural process like evolution
That's got to be one of the strangest things I've ever heard!! The more complex something is the more likely that it was NOT designed? I'm thinking Golden Gate Bridge, The Empire State Building, The Great Pyramids, The Great Wall of China, Computers, Politics...
I don't see how it's possible to claim that greater complexity implies greater likelihood of an undirected/unintelligent origin..

This message is a reply to:
 Message 187 by fallacycop, posted 08-31-2006 1:34 AM fallacycop has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 189 by ringo, posted 08-31-2006 3:34 AM mjfloresta has not replied
 Message 192 by Archer Opteryx, posted 08-31-2006 3:49 PM mjfloresta has not replied
 Message 194 by fallacycop, posted 08-31-2006 5:34 PM mjfloresta has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024