|
Author
|
Topic: Is God good?
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
Message 178 of 722 (682941)
12-06-2012 7:30 AM
|
Reply to: Message 167 by jaywill
12-05-2012 7:32 PM
|
|
Re: For the sake of the argument...
So if you kill all humanity bar a select few to keep the line going you define that as good: this being the case can we assume that you would define the actions of fictional character Hugo Drax off of James Bond as good. Aside from considerations of fictionality would his plan of killing all of humanity bar a select few to carry on the line good, also? Yes or no?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 167 by jaywill, posted 12-05-2012 7:32 PM | | jaywill has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 184 by kofh2u, posted 12-06-2012 11:54 AM | | Larni has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 179 of 722 (682942)
12-06-2012 7:38 AM
|
Reply to: Message 170 by jaywill
12-05-2012 7:46 PM
|
|
Re: For the sake of the argument...
Well you've effectively answered my question. You think near genocide is good. My opinion of real Christians such as yourself (as opposed to the fluffy bunny Christians who see the bible as basically a licence agreement that you just tick 'I agree' without really thinking) who actually has read the bible BUT STILL IDENTIFIES GOD'S ACTIONS AS GOOD has not changed. I don't think I want to talk to someone who cannot tell the difference between good and evil actions any more. Edited by Larni, : Softening the blow
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 170 by jaywill, posted 12-05-2012 7:46 PM | | jaywill has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 188 of 722 (683010)
12-06-2012 2:56 PM
|
Reply to: Message 184 by kofh2u
12-06-2012 11:54 AM
|
|
Re: For the sake of the argument...
Just answer my question, please.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 184 by kofh2u, posted 12-06-2012 11:54 AM | | kofh2u has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 209 of 722 (683061)
12-07-2012 3:10 AM
|
Reply to: Message 205 by kofh2u
12-06-2012 7:29 PM
|
|
You've been called on using these images on another thread by admins. Just letting the lurkers know.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 205 by kofh2u, posted 12-06-2012 7:29 PM | | kofh2u has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 265 of 722 (683246)
12-09-2012 5:36 AM
|
Reply to: Message 263 by Faith
12-09-2012 12:30 AM
|
|
Re: Telling God how He should act
If God affected your brain to bring you to him he has taken away your free will. How does that work?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 263 by Faith, posted 12-09-2012 12:30 AM | | Faith has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 373 of 722 (683492)
12-11-2012 9:00 AM
|
Reply to: Message 371 by Faith
12-11-2012 4:58 AM
|
|
Hi Faith. I'm not going to say Drosophila is wrong to hold the views he has but I don't think you are a psychopath. You believe your god is good because in the final analysis you believe he has very good unfathomable reason for his actions. I don't believe this to be the case but I can see where you are coming from.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 371 by Faith, posted 12-11-2012 4:58 AM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 378 by Faith, posted 12-11-2012 2:44 PM | | Larni has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
Re: Darwin's theory DID enfluence Nazis,
What do you mean by affect? There is a million miles between saying "that sounds about right" to "because that sounds about right I shall rally the nation to invade Poland".
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 683 of 722 (685971)
12-28-2012 11:11 AM
|
Reply to: Message 662 by kofh2u
12-26-2012 8:12 PM
|
|
Re: Charity is the lov of neighbor
The Bible is a book about the psychology of the individual which predictably explains the Sociology we record as histroy long after the sad consequences have taken there toll. How strange? All my years at various universities studying psychology and never once did I see the bible on the reading lists. I suppose you can guess why this is. Has any one agreed with you on this site?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 662 by kofh2u, posted 12-26-2012 8:12 PM | | kofh2u has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 685 by kofh2u, posted 12-28-2012 11:57 AM | | Larni has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 687 of 722 (686039)
12-28-2012 3:25 PM
|
Reply to: Message 685 by kofh2u
12-28-2012 11:57 AM
|
|
Re: Charity is the lov of neighbor
Get with the times, Grandad! Freud and Jung have been out of favour for years. Experimental psychology uses the scientific method: do you know what that means? If you have read the Enclycopedia of Human Behaviour further than the preface you would know the rigourous scientific procedures used in psychology. To liken Freud and Jung (both a pair of wishful thinking idiots) to a grab bag of biblical names serves what purpose, exactly? Once again you show your total ignorance of the real world. Edited by Larni, : No reason given. Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 685 by kofh2u, posted 12-28-2012 11:57 AM | | kofh2u has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 688 by kofh2u, posted 12-28-2012 5:14 PM | | Larni has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 689 of 722 (686092)
12-28-2012 8:32 PM
|
Reply to: Message 688 by kofh2u
12-28-2012 5:14 PM
|
|
Re: Charity is the lov of neighbor
If you think anyone uses Jungian mysticism in psychology today, especially with regard to learning (cognitive psychology) and conditioning (behavioural psychology) you are very wrong, young lady. Freud and Jung pulled their theories out of their respective arses: much like you seem to be doing. One time a young lad had a phobia about horses: you know what your hero Fraud (sic) said? That's right: "the boy fears emasculation by the father". Genius. Where do you get your ideas from? Do you know that you come across as a complete twat? All the best. Edited by Larni, : Toning it down
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 688 by kofh2u, posted 12-28-2012 5:14 PM | | kofh2u has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 690 by kofh2u, posted 12-28-2012 9:03 PM | | Larni has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 691 of 722 (686101)
12-28-2012 9:50 PM
|
Reply to: Message 690 by kofh2u
12-28-2012 9:03 PM
|
|
Re: Charity is the lov of neighbor
Myers/Briggs test have poor validity and reliability: that means they are bollocks. Using a this job test is no more psychology that phrenology or graphology. The rest of your rant seems more akin to Bicameralism than Frued. You really do know nothing, don't you? Edited by Larni, : No reason given. Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 690 by kofh2u, posted 12-28-2012 9:03 PM | | kofh2u has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2