Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The C.C.O.I. (Christian Cult Of Ignorance) and Willful Ignorance
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 268 of 675 (715776)
01-09-2014 4:13 AM
Reply to: Message 267 by jar
01-08-2014 10:09 AM


Re: Is It A Cop Out To Believe In Communion?
How could God help us beyond what we do to help each other? Nevermind why should He care......assume for a moment that She does......

This message is a reply to:
 Message 267 by jar, posted 01-08-2014 10:09 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 269 by jar, posted 01-09-2014 8:17 AM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 270 of 675 (715789)
01-09-2014 9:37 AM
Reply to: Message 269 by jar
01-09-2014 8:17 AM


Re: how does a good parent help?
good parents DO extend a helping hand now and then. I had an unexpected dental bill recently and my 90 year old parent helped me pay it. She wont help me all the time that way, but my hope is that God stands by to help should we really need it.
One mans blessing is another mans enabler. It may sound cheap to believe in get-out-of-hell-free cards, but Im quite sure that God has helped turn me around when I was headed for a cliff.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 269 by jar, posted 01-09-2014 8:17 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 271 by jar, posted 01-09-2014 9:50 AM Phat has replied
 Message 273 by ringo, posted 01-10-2014 11:34 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 272 of 675 (715867)
01-09-2014 5:11 PM
Reply to: Message 271 by jar
01-09-2014 9:50 AM


Re: how does a good parent help?
Has she had to bail you out before?
Have you stopped gambling?
Have you lost more than the dental bill cost by gambling?
Did she really help you?
Lets just say im doing better. She helps me just by being alive.
As does Jesus.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 271 by jar, posted 01-09-2014 9:50 AM jar has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 274 of 675 (716101)
01-12-2014 1:06 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by jar
07-02-2007 1:02 PM


Does God know what we will decide?
If GOD is the creator, GOD creates everyone.
If GOD then chooses only some of those She creates and condemns the others, then GOD creates only to punish.
If GOD foreknows the results and still goes on to create folk, then GOD creates only to punish.
Based on your logic, God does not foreknow what we will decide to do. I might believe this...either God cannot know (which is how we were given free will) and/or God judges based on what WE do (as you have mentioned before)
Others would say that God overlooks our weaknesses based on what Jesus did. You say that this is marketed by humans and is not what actually happened...right?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by jar, posted 07-02-2007 1:02 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 275 by jar, posted 01-12-2014 1:13 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 276 of 675 (716105)
01-12-2014 1:22 PM
Reply to: Message 275 by jar
01-12-2014 1:13 PM


Re: Does God know what we will decide?
jar writes:
What I say is if "God overlooks our weaknesses based on what Jesus did" has no real meaning and just makes that God look stupid.
I suppose it couldn't hurt for everyone to try and do their best,admit when they are wrong and adjust their behavior...but it certainly doesn't make us irresponsible to believe that Jesus took away our sentence. We still owe it to everyone to try and do our best.
critics would argue that we need to realize that our best is never good enough....hence why Jesus covered the spread. You might argue that people tend to slack off and absolve themselves of responsibility so long as they think that Jesus has it covered...right?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 275 by jar, posted 01-12-2014 1:13 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 277 by jar, posted 01-12-2014 1:29 PM Phat has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 278 of 675 (716110)
01-12-2014 1:44 PM
Reply to: Message 267 by jar
01-08-2014 10:09 AM


Re: Is It A Cop Out To Believe In Communion?
Jesus was a Jew, not a Christian. Jesus saw the world through Jewish eyes.
Some say He also saw the world through wisdom that He got from Dad. He may have been only human, but I think He as more....and is more. Of course you argue that my beliefs have nothing to do with changing reality...so I suppose that you have framed the issue as reality based....not belief based.
I also figure that if communion were true, we still have to do our part....the issue is what our part is. Grace critics would say that trust and belief are as important as doing.
I see no reason why both cannot be adopted.
The only logic i can see in your argument is that its human nature to not try as hard when you are trusting anyone or anything besides yourself. But is this in fact the way reality is?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 267 by jar, posted 01-08-2014 10:09 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 279 by jar, posted 01-12-2014 1:49 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 280 of 675 (716112)
01-12-2014 2:06 PM
Reply to: Message 279 by jar
01-12-2014 1:49 PM


Re: Is It A Cop Out To Believe In Communion?
whats the difference then between being a good christian and a good humanist?
heck, everyone ought do those things....the more that pitch in the cheaper it is for individuals. There is no reason why christians should have to spend every spare dime on clothing and feeding people...everyone ought do it....kinda like the theory behind the national health care...it costs so much because not everyone is in on it

This message is a reply to:
 Message 279 by jar, posted 01-12-2014 1:49 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 281 by jar, posted 01-12-2014 4:49 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 283 of 675 (716160)
01-12-2014 10:09 PM
Reply to: Message 282 by Dogmafood
01-12-2014 9:35 PM


Re: Is It A Cop Out To Believe In Communion?
jar is calling me out on trying to sidestep the definition of what it means to be a Christian. He would argue that the primary job is to clothe the naked, feed the hungry,heal the sick, comfort the sorrowful, and educate the ignorant. He would assert that Jesus message was to do this, in fact, and that the distorted message of the C.C.O.I. (Christian culture of ignorance) is that we need only trust and believe.
Thus he called me out on attempting to misdirect what he was saying by bringing humanism in to the discussion.
Edited by Phat, : invited prototypical to participate

This message is a reply to:
 Message 282 by Dogmafood, posted 01-12-2014 9:35 PM Dogmafood has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 288 by Dogmafood, posted 01-12-2014 10:44 PM Phat has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 284 of 675 (716164)
01-12-2014 10:24 PM
Reply to: Message 279 by jar
01-12-2014 1:49 PM


What Is The Calvinist God?
There are two parts to communion.
1) Communion between God and us. (trust and belief)
2) Communion between us as Christians and the rest of humanity.
In which your example holds true. We are charged to love our neighbors as ourselves. My point is that the Christians shouldn't have to foot the entire bill. Perhaps your idea of raising taxes is sound. Even Coyote would have to admit that everyone should share in the expense of fixing global warming, for example.
Many wealthier Christians, however, would argue that they too don't want the (major part of the)bill for healing the sick. They prefer private free enterprise--as do many of the opponents of global warming (as a government controlled operation) But im getting off track here....
What is the Calvinist God? Seems to me that that God is the one that most Christians here in the U.S. of A believe in.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 279 by jar, posted 01-12-2014 1:49 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 286 by jar, posted 01-12-2014 10:30 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 287 of 675 (716167)
01-12-2014 10:37 PM


Five points of Calvinism
I thought I would bring this up:
Wikipedia writes:
  • Total depravity
  • Unconditional election
  • Limited atonement
  • Irresistible grace
  • Perseverance of the saints
    The central assertion of these points is that God saves every person upon whom he has mercy, and that his efforts are not frustrated by the unrighteousness or inability of humans.
    "Total depravity," also called "total inability," asserts that as a consequence of the fall of man into sin, every person is enslaved to sin. People are not by nature inclined to love God but rather to serve their own interests and to reject the rule of God. Thus, all people by their own faculties are morally unable to choose to follow God and be saved because they are unwilling to do so out of the necessity of their own natures. (The term "total" in this context refers to sin affecting every part of a person, not that every person is as evil as they could be). This doctrine is derived from Augustine's explanation of Original Sin. While the phrases "totally depraved" and "utterly perverse" were used by Calvin, what was meant was the inability to save oneself from sin rather than being absent of goodness. Phrases like "total depravity" cannot be found in the Canons of Dort, and the Canons as well as later Reformed orthodox theologians arguably offer a more moderate view of the nature of fallen humanity than Calvin.
    "Unconditional election" asserts that God has chosen from eternity those whom he will bring to himself not based on foreseen virtue, merit, or faith in those people; rather, his choice is unconditionally grounded in his mercy alone. God has chosen from eternity to extend mercy to those he has chosen and to withhold mercy from those not chosen. Those chosen receive salvation through Christ alone. Those not chosen receive the just wrath that is warranted for their sins against God.
    "Limited atonement," also called "particular redemption" or "definite atonement", asserts that Jesus's substitutionary atonement was definite and certain in its purpose and in what it accomplished. This implies that only the sins of the elect were atoned for by Jesus's death. Calvinists do not believe, however, that the atonement is limited in its value or power, but rather that the atonement is limited in the sense that it is intended for some and not all. Some Calvinists have quipped, "The atonement is sufficient for all and efficient for the elect," while other Calvinists find such wording confusing rather than helpful. All Calvinists would affirm that the blood of Christ was sufficient to pay for every single human being IF it were God's intention to save every single human being. But Calvinists are also quick to point out that Jesus did not spill a drop of blood in vain (Galatians 2:21), and therefore, we can only be sure that His blood sufficed for those for whom it was intended, however many (Matthew 26:28) or few (Matthew 7:14) that may be. Some Calvinists also teach that the atonement accomplished certain benefits for all mankind, albeit, not their eternal salvation. The doctrine is driven by the Calvinistic concept of the sovereignty of God in salvation and their understanding of the nature of the atonement. At the Synod of Dort, both sides agreed that the atonement of Christ's death was sufficient to pay for all sin and that it was only efficacious for some (it only actually saved some). The controversy centered on whether this limited efficacy was based on God's election (the view of the Synod and of later Reformed theologians) or on the choice of each person and God's foreknowledge of that choice (the view of Arminius).
    "Irresistible grace," also called "efficacious grace", asserts that the saving grace of God is effectually applied to those whom he has determined to save (that is, the elect) and overcomes their resistance to obeying the call of the gospel, bringing them to a saving faith. This means that when God sovereignly purposes to save someone, that individual certainly will be saved. The doctrine holds that this purposeful influence of God's Holy Spirit cannot be resisted, but that the Holy Spirit, "graciously causes the elect sinner to cooperate, to believe, to repent, to come freely and willingly to Christ." This is not to deny the fact that the Spirit’s outward call (through the proclamation of the Gospel) can be, and often is, rejected by sinners; rather, it’s that inward call which cannot be rejected. In fact, every saved person can testify how, at some point in their life, they felt overwhelmingly compelled to believe in Christ, as if they had no choice but to follow Him. This is what is meant by the effectual calling of God.
    "Perseverance of the saints" (or perseverance of God with the saints) (the word "saints" is used to refer to all who are set apart by God, and not of those who are exceptionally holy, canonized, or in heaven) asserts that since God is sovereign and his will cannot be frustrated by humans or anything else, those whom God has called into communion with himself will continue in faith until the end. Those who apparently fall away either never had true faith to begin with (1 John 2:19), or, if they are saved but not presently walking in the Spirit, they will be divinely chastened (Hebrews 12:5—11) and will repent (1 John 3:6—9).
  • I think I am beginning to understand your position better.

      
    Phat
    Member
    Posts: 18348
    From: Denver,Colorado USA
    Joined: 12-30-2003
    Member Rating: 1.0


    Message 289 of 675 (716169)
    01-12-2014 10:52 PM
    Reply to: Message 4 by jar
    05-31-2007 11:13 AM


    Augustine and Sex
    Perhaps the whole idea of Original Sin was based on Augustines own seeming inability to control his passions.
    And I agree that the Calvinist idea of God is evil. It took me awhile to break out of my own ideas of what God should be.(a favoring and helpful God.)
    Im not sure I agree though that God doesnt care particularly about us...any more than other life forms. Again...its logical from a human centrist point of view thanks to Jesus. God so loved the world...He sent Jesus....you argue that his life is a bigger message than his death.
    Others assert that His death broke the power of sin.
    You assert that through His life, Jesus showed us how to overcome sin. Do you believe that the death, burial, and resurrection were no big deal? Perhaps Jesus final teaching was that we too can overcome death.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 4 by jar, posted 05-31-2007 11:13 AM jar has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 290 by Faith, posted 01-12-2014 11:07 PM Phat has not replied
     Message 291 by jar, posted 01-13-2014 9:34 AM Phat has replied

      
    Phat
    Member
    Posts: 18348
    From: Denver,Colorado USA
    Joined: 12-30-2003
    Member Rating: 1.0


    Message 292 of 675 (716198)
    01-13-2014 9:54 AM
    Reply to: Message 291 by jar
    01-13-2014 9:34 AM


    Expectations Of Doing
    im all for good behavior...im just worried about falling short...im a bit selfish by nature...unlike ringo i cant just hand out change to every down and out that I meet
    Edited by Phat, : No reason given.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 291 by jar, posted 01-13-2014 9:34 AM jar has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 293 by jar, posted 01-13-2014 10:12 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

      
    Phat
    Member
    Posts: 18348
    From: Denver,Colorado USA
    Joined: 12-30-2003
    Member Rating: 1.0


    Message 294 of 675 (716468)
    01-17-2014 12:12 PM
    Reply to: Message 11 by jar
    06-13-2007 11:02 AM


    What Works?
    jar writes:
    I believe I have said here at EvC many times that we are expected to try to do what is right, to honestly examine our behavior and admit when we have done wrong, try to make amends for those wrong actions and try not to do them again.
    Fair enough. I have a question, though. What does the author of Romans mean in this scripture?
    Romans3:9-12 writes:
    For we have already made the charge that Jews and Gentiles alike are all under the power of sin. 10 As it is written:
    There is no one righteous, not even one;
    11 there is no one who understands;
    there is no one who seeks God.
    12 All have turned away,
    they have together become worthless;
    there is no one who does good,
    not even one.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 11 by jar, posted 06-13-2007 11:02 AM jar has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 295 by jar, posted 01-17-2014 12:46 PM Phat has replied
     Message 298 by ramoss, posted 01-18-2014 1:00 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

      
    Phat
    Member
    Posts: 18348
    From: Denver,Colorado USA
    Joined: 12-30-2003
    Member Rating: 1.0


    Message 296 of 675 (716488)
    01-17-2014 4:20 PM
    Reply to: Message 295 by jar
    01-17-2014 12:46 PM


    Re: What Works?
    jar writes:
    What you want though and what Paul was marketing was somewhat dishonest and not at all what Jesus was marketing. You want foreknowledge of the outcome of the judgement.
    I dont just read bumper stickers, I assure you. You would probably nearly agree with the following study I read:
    Read the Scripture: Matthew 25:31-46
    This is the last chapter. If you've sneaked ahead to read it out of order because you can't wait to find out how it all ends, go ahead, read it! But come back to it again when you've finished the rest of the book. It will make much better sense to you then. But if you've stayed with us all the way you'll be anxious to know how Jesus ends this tremendous talk with his disciples on the Mount of Olives. He suddenly drops the use of parables and returns to a simple narrative. Unlike the household, the ten maidens, and the talents, the judgment of the sheep and goats with which he ends is not parable but fact. He introduces it with these words in verses 31-33:
    "When the Son of man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then he will sit on his glorious throne. Before him will be gathered all the nations, and he will separate them one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats, and he will place the sheep at his right hand, but the goats at the left."
    It is hard for us to remember that these words were uttered by a Man standing in the gathering dusk on the Mount of Olives, in the midst of a tiny band of forsaken men, and looking out over a city where even at that moment his enemies were completing the plans for his arrest and execution. When Jesus uttered these words, by every human appearance he was defeated. The powers of darkness were triumphant, the shadow of the cross was falling across his path way, the crowds that once had followed him had long since gone, his friends were fearful and powerless, and one of them was even then set to betray him. Yet as he surveyed the centuries he saw the light that was yet to come, and without uncertainty in his words, in that hour of triumphant evil and seeming human defeat, he declared, "When the Son of man comes in his glory...he will sit on his glorious throne. [And] before him will be gathered the nations."
    A Time for Judgment
    The mention of nations has proved confusing to some. They have thought of this as a judging of individuals on the basis of thier national affiliation; i.e., each will be held accountable for the way his government behaved as a nation. But such is not the case. Those who appear before this judgment seat do not come as Englishmen or Americans or Chinese or Afghans. The Greek word translated "nations" is literally the word "Gentiles." This is, then, the judgment of the Gentiles, the non-Jewish peoples of earth. They are persons living on earth at the time of Christ's manifestation of his presence in power and great glory.
    The purpose of the judgment is obviously to determine who shall enter the kingdom of God which the Son has come to establish. Through all the great discourses of Jesus in the gospels the evident passion of his heart is to see the will of God done on earth as it is in heaven. He will manifest himself in power for the very purpose of fulfilling those ancient dreams of the prophets-an earth that will be filled with the righteousness of God as the waters cover the sea. But only the righteous will be allowed to enter.
    It is important to note, too, that it is a judgment of sheep and goats, not one of sheep and wolves! Jesus is not choosing between the obviously bad and the obviously good. There is no division here between the opponents of the gospel and the believers in it. That separation is to be made in the very hour of the appearing of Jesus in power and glory. As Paul tells us in 2 Thessalonians 1:9:"When the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with his mighty angels in flaming fire, inflicting vengeance upon those who do not know God and upon those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus. They shall suffer the punishment of eternal destruction and exclusion from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his might." But in the judgment of the sheep and the goats Jesus is distinguishing sharply among persons all of whom profess to be Christians and claim to belong to him as members of the family of God. It is the separation of the hypocrites from the real; of the false from the true.
    Some commentators have felt there are three groups in this judgment scene: the sheep, the goats, and another group whom Jesus terms "my brethren" who are the point of testing at the judgment. These "brethren" would likely be the 144,000 Jewish believers who are closely identified with the Lord during the whole period of his presence behind the scenes. The Lord Jesus says to both the sheep and the goats, "'...as you did it [or did it not] to one of the least of these my brethren, you did it [or did it not] to me.'" It seems highly likely that there is this third group involved. Certainly, during the Tribulation each of these 144,000 will be, as Jesus himself was in the days of his flesh, "despised and rejected of men." It will be a severe test of true love to show kindness toward them for they will be an object of furious hatred by the Lawless One and the authorities of earth in that day.
    On the other hand, others feel that by "my brethren" the Lord is simply indicating any individual among the sheep or goats who is in need in the last days and to whom loving help is either extended or withheld. Whichever view is held, it is evident that the principles of our Lord's judgment then are not different from the principles by which he judges men throughout the centuries. God acts, "as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end, Amen." He will distinguish the hypocrites from among us today exactly on the same basis as he distinguished them then.
    Let us now return to the scene our Lord describes, when he will do what no other figure in human history is capable of: dissolve all national distinctions, unite all the nations as one, and sit as the unchallenged Judge over all men:
    "Then the King will say to those at his right hand, 'Come, O blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you clothed me, I was sick and you visited me, I was in prison and you came to me.'"
    The Real Test
    The arresting thing about this is that Jesus is clearly saying that the ultimate mark of an authentic Christian is not his creed, or his faith, or his Bible knowledge, but the concern which he shows to those who are in need. The practical demonstration of love is the final proof. And note also that Jesus does not ask anyone to present his case or argue his cause. He asks no questions nor requests any evidence. He simply extends to this one group the invitation, "Come, O blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom." Then he explains the basis of his choice. He has simply noted that when they had opportunity to help someone in need, they did it. Nothing more is required. It is sobering to realize that Jesus identifies himself with those in need. If you help them, he says, you are really helping me; and if you ignore them you are ignoring me. He flings the cloak of relationship around them and calls them "my brethren." Speaking of the parable of the Good Samaritan, Dr. Helmut Thielicke says:
    "How easily we let a sentence like 'God is a God of love' pass over our lips. It even sounds a bit trite. But just let Jesus stand in front of us and look at us when we say the words and at once this pious little saying becomes an accusation. Then all of a sudden we hear it spoken by the beggar we shooed from our door yesterday, the servant-girl we dismissed, perhaps because she was going to have a baby, the neighbor whose name has recently been dragged through the newspapers because of some disgraceful affair, whom we let know that we always walk the straight and narrow path. Suddenly we hear them all speaking it, because this saying has something to do with all of them, not only with the God whodwells above the clouds, for in them the eyes of the Lord himself are gazing at us." *
    The sheep who inherit the kingdom are those who have responded to these needs in love, concern, and ministry. They have probably done so at considerable cost or risk to themselves. But no matter, they did what they could. With the goats it is the opposite story:
    "Then he will say to those at this left hand, 'Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels; for I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me no drink, I was a stranger you did not welcome me, naked and you did not clothe me, sick and in prison and you did not visit me.'"
    The seriousness of this matter of helping the needy is seen in the severity of the Lord's words here. "Depart from me you cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels." And let us remember that these are people who honestly think they are sheep! They can point with pride to a moment when they made a profession of belief, they are, perhaps, dogmatic about a creed and are church members in good standing, but by their lack of response to the pleas for help that come to them from every side they stand revealed as goats-false sheep-who never were sheep at all.
    What a Surprise!
    The reaction of both the sheep and the goats to the Lord's words is one of stunned surprise. They are completely taken aback by what he says. It is clearly evident that both groups expected a different basis of judgment. As they were being divided into one group or another they doubtless felt they knew the reason for the choice. Surely the sheep would feel that the basis was that of faith. There would be ringing in their ears all the great and marvelous words of Scripture declaring that justification before God is by faith alone. Can't you see them waiting to come before the King, each one nervously reviewing his testimony, trying to recall the exact wording of the great promises on which he would rest all his hopes for this moment?
    But the strange thing is, not one is ever given the chance to say a word. The issue is already settled. Each person is simply told to which group he belongs.
    "Then the righteous will answer him, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you drink? And when did we see you a stranger and welcome you, or naked and clothe you? And when did we see you sick or in prison and visit you?'"
    But of course the issue really is one of faith. The sheep are asked to take their place on the right hand of the throne because all through their lives their genuine faith has been producing its inevitable fruit of good works. Unthinkingly, unconsciously, born of love for Jesus Christ, they have been responding to the pleas and the needs of those about them. They kept no records, they expected no praise. For them it has been a glad privilege. They were unaware they were doing anything unusual, but found a real delight in meeting the needs of others. There was no hardship involved. They felt it was a continuing joy to be permitted to minister in Christ's name. But not one deed performed in that way has ever escaped the eye of their watching Lord. There is no need for him to examine them. They had laid up abundant treasure in heaven.
    But the goats are equally surprised. They, too, are caught off guard by this basis of judgment:
    "Then they also will answer, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to you?"
    Yet they may have guessed even more closely than the sheep the true basis for judgment. Very likely they are sure that it is good works. They know that God is interested in the poor, the down-trodden, the oppressed, and they are all ready for him. Already they have been making long mental lists of the many times they have ministered to those in need about them. They can recall detailed descriptions of what they did. They can total up large sums of money given, complete with income tax receipts. No doubt the amount of money so expended is terribly impressive, for as someone has remarked, it takes a great deal of philanthropy to deodorize a fortune! They have even put in long hours working for charity, fighting for racial equality, or protesting sub-standard housing. To these self-justifying persons the King replies: "Truly, I say to you, as you did it not to one of the least of these, you did it not to me."
    Good Works That Aren't Good
    They are even more surprised than the sheep at the Lord's words. It was good deeds of the very type he describes that they were depending upon for acceptance in this hour. They are at a total loss to understand his rejection. But they have forgotten what Jesus says in the Sermon on the Mount. There he is careful to tell us that deeds done "to be seen by men" already have their reward. Even if the deeds are not publicly known, if they are done for private satisfaction they are in the same category. "Let not your left hand know what your right hand does," he says. That is, do not even take note of what you do yourself; do not even privately pat yourself on the back.
    It is the times which they have forgotten that he uses for judgment, and not the times they remember. It is the times they looked the other way when some begging hand reached out. The times they were busy with other demands when word came of the sick and the dying. The times when they refused, through shame or pride, to visit some poor wretch in prison lest they be associated with him. Their eyes were averted as they walked around the stricken man lying by the wayside. They turned deaf ears to pleas when they could have helped. But these incidents have long been forgotten. They are quite honest when they say in astonishment, "Lord, when?"
    But this is false Christianity, no matter how much it may be dressed in evangelical clothes. Perhaps nothing can describe it better than this prayer, written by Richard Woike. He calls it "A Prayer to Avoid" but we might well term it,
    "The Prayer of a Goat."
    "O thou pleasant, comfortable, kindly, good-natured God: How glad I am that I can look forward, with a reasonable degree of certainty, to another ordinary day. Keep me today from anything that taxes my faith from discomfort, from unnecessary strain, from unusual problems, especially those involving sickness or death, or the necessity of extending financial aid to relatives and friends.
    Dear Lord, grant that nothing may occur which will disturb my satisfaction with the way I am, and the things I say, and the thoughts I think, the acts I do, or the many deeds I leave undone. Give me this day, in addition to my daily bread, the butter, meats, and sweetmeats that are my necessary diet, and let me not be troubled by qualms of conscience concerning the amount of time and money I spend on food and clothing, pastimes, good and bad, and those pursuits which, while not of spiritual value, are the accepted hall-mark of the normal citizen of this enlightened community in this enlightened age.
    About the future and the darkening trend of things, keep me from thoughtfulness. Events rush on, the world travails. Can screaming headlines prove thy hand's at work this very moment, bringing near that fateful cry, 'Behold! He comes!'? O, Lord, such disconcerting thoughts! Keep me from worrying about such things, and guide me safely to and from my office, and my home. Amen."
    How Man Judges; How God Judges
    Nothing reveals more sharply the radical difference between God's judging and man's than this story of the sheep and the goats. Even our treasured "good deeds" are shown up for what they are in the searching light from this throne of glory. Good deeds that are not the unconscious, automatic response of a heart indwelt by Jesus Christ are not truly "good" deeds. They are planned deeds, contrived, carefully performed for the public eye, or if in private, done in the hope that they will purchase some merit or fav or before God.
    But God's judgments take note only of the unconscious moments of our lives, the times when we are off guard, when we are unaware. It is then that we truly reveal ourselves. The test comes, not in our remembered actions, but in our unconscious reactions, our instinctive, unplanned responses.
    This was borne sharply to my mind some time ago when, in the company of a number of friends, I attended a public concert in a large city. The officials of both the city and state were in attendance and a great crowd of people had jammed into a small open air square. The officials were seated in front row chairs on a small platform. Among the various performers that night was a young starlet from Hollywood. She was dressed in a gownless evening strap and in this revealing attire came to the microphone to sing. She did several swinging numbers, swaying with her hips and snapping her fingers. As she sang I happened to turn to note the reaction of the mayor of the city, seated on the front row.
    Evidently he had lost himself in the performance, for his guard was down. His eyes were agleam with lechery, his mouth had dropped partly open, and he was fairly drooling. I saw also the governor of the state, seated a few chairs away, who was eyeing the mayor with a stern look of disapproval. While I watched, the governor caught the mayor's eye. Immediately he reddened, shifted uneasily in his chair, closed his mouth, sat straight up and looked out over the audience. The governor's glance had said to him, in the most eloquent silence I have ever heard, "Shape up, man, you're in public!" Though the mayor was the soul of propriety the rest of the evening, in one unconscious moment reality had shown through.
    he Life That Wins
    If we are not going to be tested by the times when we are alert and on guard, but God is "unfair" enough to catch us when we are simply responding to what we are, then what we are must be what he demands. There is only one life that is sufficient for that kind of demand. Only one life is capable of responding instantaneously with unselfish love to the needs of others. That is the life of Jesus Christ. If we have not received him into our hearts we do not have that life. If we have received him, we need to make ourselves available to him. We should be willing, moment by moment, to reach out to others in the strength and love which he will impart to us, as soon as we begin to obey. This alone is the life that can meet the test.
    The One Great Word---Watch!
    Now the discourse is ended. We have heard the greatest prophet who ever lived outline for us the history of the future. It has been a fascinating experience, containing many surprising and unexpected revelations. If we had never read this discourse before we could not possibly have guessed what the outcome of history will be. But now that we know, what shall we do about it?
    There can be only one answer to that. We must do what our Lord says. We must obey the comand he repeats again and again. Watch! Keep alert! Watch! We have learned now what that means. It means three specific and definite things: It means we are to help one another feed upon the living Lord Jesus, as revealed in the written Word of God. We must study the Book. It means we must walk in the Spirit, depending not upon our human resources and weapons, but upon the power of an indwelling Spirit who is God himself, at work in us. It means we must live dangerously, venturing ourselves for Christ's sake. We must keep thrusting out in his name, buying up every opportunity to meet those around us at the point of their need.
    This, and this alone, is watching. Nothing can take its place. Therefore,
    "Watch at all times, praying that you may have strength to escape all these things that will take place, and to stand before the Son of Man" (Luke 21:36).
    Prayer
    Holy Father, how easy it is to be orthodox in word and unorthodox in deed, to be compassionate in a meeting and selfish and cruel at home. But thank you for the cleansing grace so freely available in the Lord Jesus. Teach us how to live by him so that all we do and say is a manifestation of his life at work in us. In Jesus' name, Amen.
    I stumbled upon that as I was searching the internet to see if any other Christians agreed with your Matthew 25 theology. I guess there are!
    Edited by Phat, : No reason given.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 295 by jar, posted 01-17-2014 12:46 PM jar has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 297 by jar, posted 01-17-2014 5:36 PM Phat has replied

      
    Phat
    Member
    Posts: 18348
    From: Denver,Colorado USA
    Joined: 12-30-2003
    Member Rating: 1.0


    Message 300 of 675 (716517)
    01-18-2014 10:56 AM
    Reply to: Message 297 by jar
    01-17-2014 5:36 PM


    Re: What Works?
    jar writes:
    The issue is whether or not what I say makes sense, can be supported by evidence, reason, logic and reality and if it would improve life for others.
    I dont agree with you when you say that its harmful to think that God will do anything for us. After all, what are close friends for? And why does hope in divine intervention make my responsibilities any less?

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 297 by jar, posted 01-17-2014 5:36 PM jar has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 301 by jar, posted 01-18-2014 11:22 AM Phat has replied

      
    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024