|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 2/2 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 1435 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: MACROevolution vs MICROevolution - what is it? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
I dont believe there is gene loss. The genes are just silent if not dominate. DNA is quite remarkable. Another reason I don't believe in common descent. If it were animal x could arguably give birth to anything contained in its DNA. To argue loss, would mean you need evidence. Cells inside the ovaries, or testicles, have lysosomes. And when reproducing, if there is a mutation the body detects it and the cell with the mutation destroys itself with its own lydosomes from inside due to stimulation from outside the cell.
Edited by DOCJ, : Add
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
How exactly do you explain time always existing from your pov? Any reason to believe it? How exactly do you explain the wmap? The bb all these scientists support, or are you an electrical universe supporter?
Edited by DOCJ, : Err
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
Wow good job buddy. You are learning. You still have not figured it out... 🤤
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
I'm going to help you out a tiny bit. Evidence does not speak evolution. Evidence is interpreted, people use their imagination, draw an idea, research the idea, test the idea and draw a conclusion. And other people test it and decide, etc. Its pretty simple. And it is still unhealthy to change your mind frequently just because a new rock is found. And people think it's a new transitional fossil... And even if it is a fossil that looks like something else, doesn't mean it is actually transitional... It's something that lived and died. That's it. Yes I can intrepret it too.. I'm not anchoring.. Look, I didn't insult you.. Wow.. You really need to learn how to discuss issues.. learn some etiquette.. 😙😁😛
Edited by DOCJ, : Err Edited by DOCJ, : Err
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
Good job buddy.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
Feel free to start a discussion. Promise you I aint going anywhere. And there are absolutely no issues in Genesis, it's just you anchoring.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
The allels contain the genes. And chromosomes contain up to 25,000 genes. Plenty of room.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
I'm not going anywhere, feel free to get this discussion rolling.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
Referencing false teachers. It is not just needing a job.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
Right... Figured 1 of you would step into it... Testing is always fun.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
The alleles contain the genes. Different sequences of alleles come together and wallah you have a gene. And obviously an allele is not a gene as 1 by itself is not a gene. The video does a great job of explaining not only that point but the point of drift.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsgYxJN0xx8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
Incorrect. A combination of alleles are a gene. Hence alleles are contained in the gene. The gene released that stimulates the cells to do what they do in order for a trait to be seen is because multiple alleles come together...
Just like multiple chromosomes come together to make up the DNA. The DNA contains the chromosomes. Edited by DOCJ, : err Edited by DOCJ, : err Edited by DOCJ, : err Edited by DOCJ, : err
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
I see what is happening in our discussion. It's a language issue. I will restate my point differently.
The alleles make up the gene. They are contained within the gene. However, they are not THE gene. Just like chromosomes are not THE DNA. Edited by DOCJ, : err
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
I don't believe I have any issues with that point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
You never responded to 234.
The silenced gene/s are merely being drifted/recessed as in the video. The information is not lost. Unless you can provide some data showing your point, there is no reason to believe a gene is lost.. Drift can occur for thousands of years. Then people are like, HEY where did you get that blond hair, or those blue eyes. Nobody has those in our family (that they know). Hence no lost information. At least that is what they taught and I confirmed in college. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsgYxJN0xx8
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024