Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,918 Year: 4,175/9,624 Month: 1,046/974 Week: 5/368 Day: 5/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Paul Harvey's take on prayer in public/Xmas (In general, a "freedom of speech" topic)
Brad
Member (Idle past 4818 days)
Posts: 143
From: Portland OR, USA
Joined: 01-26-2004


Message 136 of 165 (174583)
01-07-2005 3:28 AM
Reply to: Message 65 by Brian
01-05-2005 8:12 AM


Re: Moral High Ground?
Hi Brian,
I know this is a bit late, and I have not read through all the posts yet, so forgive me if this point has already been made, but you say you know what society you would prefer, and from what you have written you seem to prefer a society that wants to throw it's flaws under the rug and pretend like everything is great.
Just because KKK people can't go out on the street and offend people does not mean they no longer feel the way they do. Changing what people can say does not change their opinions. I would choose to live in a society where there is no racism because PEOPLE AREN'T RACIST. This will never happen if the problem is just hidden away behind silly laws that prevent people from expressing their opinion.
A good example of this in America right now is Howard Stern, he is fould mouthed, disgusting, and I find hilarious. But that doesn't mean everyone does, so the FCC thinks they can just start imposing fines on what he has and is saying. I'm sorry, this is crap. Change the station.
I support people's right to express their opinions, no matter what those opinions are as long as there is not threat of violence. I'm not sure but I think racism is hate speech, and therefor does constitute a threat of violence these days, so we're not as sad as we seem if I'm right.
My point is, Brian, I agree with most of what you say, where we differ is I want a system that supports honesty, you prefer a system that forces it's people to keep things 'in the closet.' It's 12:30am here, so I'm gonna quit before I become even more nonsensicle. I hope you at least understand WHY we support this freedom, even though we don't support the abuse it can cause. Agree to disagree and such.
Brad
[fixed no spaces between lines/thoughts, it was one big mass, looked like a Brad McFall post (oh a side note my name IS Brad...coincidence? I'm going to bed)]
This message has been edited by Shadow, 01-07-2005 03:30 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Brian, posted 01-05-2005 8:12 AM Brian has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 139 by contracycle, posted 01-07-2005 7:07 AM Brad has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024