|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Quick Questions, Short Answers - No Debate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
caffeine Member (Idle past 1279 days) Posts: 1800 From: Prague, Czech Republic Joined: |
Re: The Pound Sign Ooohhh... He was expecting the hash tag but saw the libra. When he said he "the pound sign", I thought he was referring to the libra. When I say 'the pound sign' I am referring to the libra. When I write it in my posts, that's what I see. When anyone else writes it, however, I see neither the hash symbol nor the libra, but rather the funny capital L with a line through it like in the Polish city 'd'. Bizarre.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
When I say 'the pound sign' I am referring to the libra. When I write it in my posts, that's what I see. When anyone else writes it, however, I see neither the hash symbol nor the libra, but rather the funny capital L with a line through it like in the Polish city 'd'. To me, the libra looks like a funny capital L with a line through it. I don't see the differnece between the libra and the first letter in that Polish city.
Bizarre. I'd guess its a display or language setting in your browser.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
caffeine Member (Idle past 1279 days) Posts: 1800 From: Prague, Czech Republic Joined: |
I'd guess its a display or language setting in your browser. And yours too, if you're also seeing the . What I don't understand, if this is just how my browser displays things, is why it doesn't happen to the libra in my own post. Do you see £ as the same as in my post?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
How's this for fucked up:
In the email alert I got for this response, the html code 163 shows as the hash tag, but then when opened up the actual post, I see it as the libra £ That's the html code and it comes out as a libra for me in this post.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Modulous Member (Idle past 240 days) Posts: 7801 From: Manchester, UK Joined: |
To me, the libra looks like a funny capital L with a line through it. I don't see the differnece between the libra and the first letter in that Polish city. Łdź It's HTML entity #321 The libra is a stylized letter 'L' with a horizontal line through it. The one in the city name is a normal looking L with a slanted line through it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
d It's HTML entity #321 The libra is a stylized letter 'L' with a horizontal line through it. The one in the city name is a normal looking L with a slanted line through it. Ah, I see. In his post, I see the name of that city starting with a libra, not this thing: . ABE: Wait, what the fuck? I swear is was that Polish L in my email notification and what I submitted, but now I see it as the libra again ABE2: Yeah, in your post I see the polish L and in my quote of your post I see the libra What sort of wizardry is this!? Edited by Catholic Scientist, : No reason given. Edited by Catholic Scientist, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22951 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 6.9
|
It's probably this HTML setting that this website uses and that your email probably doesn't. It controls how characters are displayed:
<meta http-equiv="Content-type" value="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> I can change this setting if someone would like to suggest a better one, but I should mention that in my own experience I've found that some settings are better for some characters and not others, and vice-versa, and no setting solves all problems. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nwr Member Posts: 6484 From: Geneva, Illinois Joined: Member Rating: 8.7 |
Looking at a page from a different forum, I see:
Hmm, code tags did not work there with straight html.Jesus was a liberal hippie
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
Don't bother changing anything; its of little to no consequence.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dogmafood Member Posts: 1815 From: Ontario Canada Joined: |
In Dr Adequate's most excellent geology thread he demonstrates that reversal of the earths magnetic poles has happened in the past and, as I understand it, is happening now or is a constant process.
What will the effects be on our technology? On migrating animals? Or anything else for that matter.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member Posts: 16113 Joined: |
In Dr Adequate's most excellent geology thread he demonstrates that reversal of the earths magnetic poles has happened in the past and, as I understand it, is happening now or is a constant process. What will the effects be on our technology? On migrating animals? Or anything else for that matter. Well, anyone using a magnetic compass will be screwed. However, we'll have some warning --- the strength of the poles will weaken and they'll start to wander in an unprecedented way, so we'll see it coming. I don't know what proportion of migrating animals use geomagnetism. Geomagnetic reversals are not associated with extinction events (and a good thing too) so the effect on biology will likely be minimal. The weakening of the Earth's magnetic field will (IIRC) allow the solar wind to hit us harder than it usually does. Some people have suggested that this would be very bad, but again it is a fact that reversals are not associated with extinction events, so it can't be that bad. But there might well be an uptick in cancer rates. It is thought that such an event might well happen quite soon, but that's "quite soon" in geologist time, so maybe some time in the next few thousand years. If you want to worry about something, worry about Yellowstone erupting instead.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dogmafood Member Posts: 1815 From: Ontario Canada Joined: |
Thanks for the reply.
If you want to worry about something, worry about Yellowstone erupting instead. Will it help?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member Posts: 16113 Joined: |
Will it help? Well, forewarned is forearmed. If it happens, and you're anywhere near it, get inside, shut the doors and windows, and turn off the air-conditioning. This won't avert the post-apocalyptic nightmare, but at least your lungs won't be shredded by volcanic glass.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coragyps Member (Idle past 989 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: |
It came up the other day somewhere around here that the English "thee" is the objective/dative second-person singular pronoun in the old familiar style of speech.
What is the plural? "Ye" is the subjective, right? Is it "you?" or something weird?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Son Goku Inactive Member |
I think it was actually "you", I could be wrong though.
In other words: Thou (Nominative singular)Ye (Nominative Plural) Thee (Dative/Accusative Singular) You (Dative/Accusative Plural)
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024