A fatal logical flaw in creationism?

No, there doesn't have to have been a first anything. Let me illustrate with gman's post #8 in this thread: This demonstrates a certain naivete of relativity theory and the various ways of describing infinities. There is nothing irrational about the idea of an infinite number of temporal moments in our past because time is not discrete -- it's continuous (think: space-time continuum). All continuous intervals are infinite, even if they are bounded. The last hour had an infinite number of temporal moments in it, and so did the last minute, and the last second for that matter. Even so, there's no rule that says infinite sets cannot have a least or greatest element. The points on a closed continous interval comprise an infinite set with BOTH a greatest and least element, for example.The argument that an infinite number of temporal moments cannot have passed for the reason that "infinities don't end" is easily overcome by some elementary training in set theory.

Do you have anything to say that actually addresses my statements?

You do realize that the burden it might incur on humans is completely irrelevant to the truth of the matter, don't you? Please speak for yourself. I'm doing quite well looking after myself, thank you very much. Again, you might like to think that "someone is in complete control," however I have never found it necessary. I'm not convinced that men NEED to be saved from men.

Then perhaps you should consider using "I" as the subject of your sentences instead of "we." ...hanging the threat of violence over your head. The possibility has been considered, and so far nothing requires that there is one.

While that is something I believe, that is not what my statements signified.I mean that the argument that there MUST be a so-called "First Cause" since time allegedly cannot be infinite in the past is a faulty one.