Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A fatal logical flaw in creationism?
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 49 of 214 (101644)
04-21-2004 6:24 PM


Could someone please explain to desdamona one more time that she needs to provide evidence for her claims?
Edited:
Also, could someone please ask desdamona to tell us if she knows the mechanisms of evolution? She is making all these claims regarding evolution and I just want to know if she knows the first thing about the theory itself.
[This message has been edited by Lam, 04-21-2004]

The Laminator

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 60 of 214 (101682)
04-21-2004 8:40 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by NosyNed
04-21-2004 8:35 PM


Re: A Big Waste of Time
Ned writes:
Guys, you know this one isn't worth the effort. There are no particular reasoning skills here and almost no reading skills.
But, if you're having fun....
Don't tell me you just realized that.

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by NosyNed, posted 04-21-2004 8:35 PM NosyNed has not replied

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 66 of 214 (101693)
04-21-2004 9:12 PM


Ok, I can't stand it anymore.
Circle = A plane curve everywhere equidistant from a given fixed point, the center.
Round = Being such that every part of the surface or the circumference is equidistant from the center: a round ball.
Big difference between the 2 words.

The Laminator

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by desdamona, posted 04-21-2004 9:41 PM coffee_addict has not replied

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 76 of 214 (101728)
04-22-2004 12:13 AM
Reply to: Message 75 by Asgara
04-21-2004 11:43 PM


Re: There had to be a first!
Asgara writes:
Yeah! You tell her hun...
Mike the Wiz fan
The sad part is I doubt she understood any of Mike's post. Based on her past behavior, which she exhibited next to no reading comprehension skill whatsoever, she will simply dismiss Mike's message as fuzzy words.

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by Asgara, posted 04-21-2004 11:43 PM Asgara has not replied

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 78 of 214 (101730)
04-22-2004 12:14 AM
Reply to: Message 74 by Sylas
04-21-2004 10:24 PM


Re: Post formatting.
Sylas, I just have to ask. Is your avatar really a picture of you on a really bad day?

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by Sylas, posted 04-21-2004 10:24 PM Sylas has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by Asgara, posted 04-22-2004 12:23 AM coffee_addict has not replied
 Message 80 by Sylas, posted 04-22-2004 12:36 AM coffee_addict has replied

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 81 of 214 (101737)
04-22-2004 12:42 AM
Reply to: Message 80 by Sylas
04-22-2004 12:36 AM


Re: Post formatting.
What was Ned's and your avatar look like before?

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by Sylas, posted 04-22-2004 12:36 AM Sylas has not replied

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 84 of 214 (101741)
04-22-2004 1:22 AM
Reply to: Message 82 by One_Charred_Wing
04-22-2004 12:44 AM


Re: From A fellow CHRISTIAN
Born2BKicked- I mean Born2Preach writes:
Sorry about the quotes, had to have some fun because I just learned how to do the blue box.
Sylas showed you one thing and you went berserk with it. What's next, pictures of you on playgirl?

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by One_Charred_Wing, posted 04-22-2004 12:44 AM One_Charred_Wing has not replied

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 86 of 214 (101756)
04-22-2004 2:20 AM
Reply to: Message 85 by desdamona
04-22-2004 2:09 AM


Re: There had to be a first!
Ok, I'll break my vow of silence.
If something is a circle, then it is round. However, if something is round, it does not necessarily have to be a circle.
If you can name one object in this world that is a circle but 3 dimensional, then you are smarter than all of us combined.
If something is spherical (3 dimensional), it absolutely cannot be described as a circle.
Get your definitions straight. English is my second language and I can still make that simple distinction.

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by desdamona, posted 04-22-2004 2:09 AM desdamona has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by desdamona, posted 04-22-2004 3:38 AM coffee_addict has not replied

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 87 of 214 (101757)
04-22-2004 2:27 AM
Reply to: Message 85 by desdamona
04-22-2004 2:09 AM


Re: There had to be a first!
desdamona writes:
Whose the one who takes the bible literally now?If you want to find fault in something bad enough,you will.
First of all, the reason we were nitpicking the bible right down to the letter was because you claimed that the bible is absolutely 100% accurate, both scientifically and morally.
You have finally admitted that there are imperfections in your holy book. This is the first and greatest step you've taken to get away from your delusional state of mind.
Get this straight in your head. Nobody here is trying to get you to lose your faith. All we ask is you get your facts straight before making incredible claims on here. As a rule of thumb, be prepared to back up your claims with either credible sources or reasonable explanations everytime you make an assertion.

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by desdamona, posted 04-22-2004 2:09 AM desdamona has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 89 by desdamona, posted 04-22-2004 2:40 AM coffee_addict has replied

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 93 of 214 (101764)
04-22-2004 2:55 AM
Reply to: Message 88 by desdamona
04-22-2004 2:34 AM


Re: There had to be a first!
I will answer to each question off the top of my head.
quote:
Did you know,Every session of Congress begins with a prayer by a paid preacher,whose salary has been paid by the taxpayer since 1777?
Even if this is true, our country was founded on the basis of majority rule with minority rights. I don't see how this info can help us in our debate.
quote:
Did you know 52 of the 55 founders of the Constitution were members of the established orthodox churches in the colonies?
If this is true, so what? This country is now the most diversified country in the world. Again, majority rule with minority rights.
quote:
Did you know,Thomas Jefferson worried that the Courts would overstep their authority and instead of interpreting the law,would begin making law...an oligarchy...the rule of few over many?
And this has what to do with what we are talking about?
quote:
Did you know that the very first Supreme Court Justice,John Jay,said,"Americans should select and prefer Christians as their rulers?
The supreme court also ruled that blacks were not really human and that justified slavery. What supreme court justices in the past had said have absolutely nothing to do with the here and the now.
quote:
As you enter the Supreme Court courtroom,the two huge oak doors have the Ten Commandments engraved on each lower portion of each door.
I believe that those were removed. Not sure.
quote:
James Madison,the fourth President,known as "The Father of Our Constitution" made the following statement"We have staked the whole of all our political institutions upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves,to control ourselves,to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God."
Again, Madison also supported slavery and breaking treaties after treaties with the native Americans. Are you going to try to justify that too?
quote:
We can go on and on like this,I happen to know that America was founded on God,amen. Only God can make a nation free!
Would you like to back this up with an explanation?
quote:
When they say one nation under God,they use to mean it!
The 2 words "under God" were not in the origional pledge of allegiance. It used to be "one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." General Eisenhower added in the 2 words to justify that "God" was on the Americans' side in the war. Get your facts straight!
quote:
When we say the land of the free,we don't mean free to fornicate,lie,steal or murder the unborn.
Just what in the hell are you talking about?
quote:
Do you know what the Geneva Bible is? It was the Bible that came with our ancestors to America.
God is first,amen.
The Puritans were also some of the first people to colonize America. They happened to have a witch hunt and killed of a few dozen innocent people.
I just told buzsaw in another thread this and I'm going to tell you the same thing. What you have done is used tradition to make a case for your argument, which is something that I don't think even you know what you are arguing for anymore. You are in fact committing one of the fallacies of argument: Appeal to tradition.
You are practically saying that since A is traditional, therefore A is true or correct. I can say the same thing about slavery. Tradition doesn't mean right.

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by desdamona, posted 04-22-2004 2:34 AM desdamona has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by desdamona, posted 04-22-2004 3:06 AM coffee_addict has not replied
 Message 99 by desdamona, posted 04-22-2004 3:10 AM coffee_addict has not replied
 Message 100 by crashfrog, posted 04-22-2004 3:19 AM coffee_addict has not replied

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 94 of 214 (101765)
04-22-2004 2:57 AM
Reply to: Message 89 by desdamona
04-22-2004 2:40 AM


Re: There had to be a first!
desdamona writes:
The bible is first of all fact.It is 100% percent correct all the time,amen.See how you so easily mis-interpret everything you read?
Then explain again about Earth being a circle.

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by desdamona, posted 04-22-2004 2:40 AM desdamona has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by desdamona, posted 04-22-2004 3:02 AM coffee_addict has not replied
 Message 108 by desdamona, posted 04-22-2004 3:46 AM coffee_addict has not replied

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 144 of 214 (102099)
04-23-2004 2:38 AM
Reply to: Message 142 by desdamona
04-23-2004 2:13 AM


Re: There had to be a first!
I don't care if you're a woman or half woman half man. I treat everyone equally.
Good to see something positive from you. And excuse my impatience.

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by desdamona, posted 04-23-2004 2:13 AM desdamona has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 147 by desdamona, posted 04-23-2004 2:58 AM coffee_addict has not replied

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 161 of 214 (102198)
04-23-2004 2:11 PM
Reply to: Message 160 by NosyNed
04-23-2004 1:49 PM


Re: Big Words
I'll try to explain phylogeny in even simpler terms.
It is a branch of science that studies evolution of life and relationships between individual species. We can look at fossils and examine the similarities of features. We can compare "DNA" of currently existing species to see how closely related they are. Through such studies, we can draw out a "tree" that shows where and when a species branched out and became its own species.
Here is a sample of what a phylogeny tree for primates.

{Right click on graphic, to see full scale version - AM}
{Rescaled graphic, to restore page width to normal - AM}
Notice how over time different species branched out of certain individual species.
[This message has been edited by Lam, 04-23-2004]
[This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 04-23-2004]

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 160 by NosyNed, posted 04-23-2004 1:49 PM NosyNed has not replied

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 162 of 214 (102199)
04-23-2004 2:13 PM
Reply to: Message 160 by NosyNed
04-23-2004 1:49 PM


Re: Big Words
Hahahahahaha. You finally fixed the italic code.

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 160 by NosyNed, posted 04-23-2004 1:49 PM NosyNed has not replied

coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 171 of 214 (102225)
04-23-2004 4:11 PM
Reply to: Message 163 by Loudmouth
04-23-2004 2:47 PM


Re: Big Words
I'm pretty sure that by the time I finish graduate school I will be as cranky as you

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 163 by Loudmouth, posted 04-23-2004 2:47 PM Loudmouth has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024