desdemona,
however, lables and names you use when talking about those that disagree with you is not going to win converts or a willingness to change to your way of viewing things.It only inspires anger and yes, even christians will get upset and irritated at you. No one likes being treated ugly.
You are being treated exactly as you deserve.
I have caught you lying & being a hypocrite. You have hand waved away evidence simply by claiming "that's not evidence". No supporting argument, no reasons, just a dismissal.
If this is what Christians feel is acceptable behaviour then it's you who are unlikely to win converts, not me.
We cannot believe in every scientist,we have to choose which scientists we feel are best at presenting their views.
We don't "believe" scientists at all. We accept or reject proposed hypotheses & theories based upon their logical efficacy, evidential support, & falsifications realised or not. A scientists presentation skills are neither here nor there.
Science is not like being preached at from the pulpit.
How do you mean "evidence" and beyond resonable doubt?
You have not even given any names and sources.
Yes I did. See the link at the top of the post, there is a link in there which takes you back to Bentons study. How quickly you forget.
Mark
[This message has been edited by mark24, 04-24-2004]
"Physical Reality of Matchette’s EVOLUTIONARY zero-atom-unit in a transcendental c/e illusion" - Brad McFall