|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 2/2 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Did the Flood really happen? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stile Member Posts: 4295 From: Ontario, Canada Joined:
|
Faith writes: Stile writes: If I went to the Grand Canyon - right on top of the geological columns, and dumped a wheel-barrel of dirt on it and stamped it down - would this be "building on the geological column?" No. I admit defeat.Your ignorance is too great for me to overcome. I'll leave now.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined:
|
Good bye. And try to understand what the Geological Column is while you're gone.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1435 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
And how many times do *I* have to tell YOU that the oceans are not building on the geological column? Repeating false statements\assertions\ignorant c mments doesn't make them any truer than their original bald falseness.
AS I SAID, your candidates for today's deposition on the geo column are either too small though in the right place or large enough but in the wrong place. ... Too small doesn't matter in the slightest. It''s just a matter of time. And you have a major problem with time. (see Age Correlations and An Old Earth, Version 2 No 1). There is no such thing as the wrong place.
... The Geological Column is OVER AND DONE WITH. Says the person who insists on being wrong over and over and over. Now it occurs to me, that you may be confusing the geological column with rocks, not actively deposited sediments that have not yet lithified. Is that possible? Enjoyby our ability to understand RebelAmericanZenDeist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
So if it's too small we just imagine that eventually a whole bunch of small deosits of the same sediment will accumulate on the Geo Column hither and yon until eventually we have a new stratum for our time, complete with fossils even. Gosh what faith you all have!
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 198 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
try to understand what the Geological Column is while you're gone.
I've posted several definitions to which he can refer and whichyou can't handle.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
I guess I missed them.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 198 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
So if it's too small we just imagine that eventually a whole bunch of small deosits of the same sediment will accumulate on the Geo Column hither and yon until eventually we have a new stratum for our time, complete with fossils even. Gosh what understanding of natural processes you all have!
FIFY.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined:
|
Faith writes: And how many times do *I* have to tell YOU that the oceans are not building on the geological column? It doesn't matter how many times you repeat utter nonsense, it still remains nonsense; just boring nonsense.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Uh huh, but there's no point in pretending I haven't answered a nonsensical point when I have, whether you like it or not.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
I don't understand "FIFY."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 198 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
I guess I missed them.
I've posted definitions three times now. You didn't miss them.
quote:(Merriam-Webster, note "a locality or region") quote:(CreationWiki.com, note "crust" ) quote:(Conservapedia, note" around the world quote: quote: quote: Did you notice that none of those definitions restrict the location of the geologic column in any way? Every point on the crust (which encompasses all the parts that are above the mantle, including sea floors is the top of "the" geologic column. Really it's the local portion of a world-wide geologic column. The interior layers of the crust vary widely from place to place. But we can tell from context that "geologic column" really means "local geologic column.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 198 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
You haven't answered any points. Repeating claims is not answering.
What is the source of your claim that the geologic column is only on land?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1435 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
... the problem with the candidates for continuation of the Geological Colum -- meaninjg those accumulated on the land area ... ... is that you are wrong. The geological column covers ALL dirt/rock/sediment surfaces, on dry land AND UNDER WATER. Dry land is usually a surface with net EROSION, which supplies the sediments being deposited on the geological column in rivers lakes and, yes virginia, oceans. Only a person willingly ignorant of the basics of geology cycles would claim otherwise ...
quote: It's a cycle of erosion ("corrosion"), deposition, lithification, uplift, rinse and repeat. Limiting your discussion to only areas that are net erosion areas means you are only looking at half the cycle. OBVIOUSLY, if you only look at areas of net erosion you will not observe any building of the geological column there. So what happens to all that sediment that has eroded away? It is added to the geological column in the locations where it is deposited as sediments ... by wind or water. A chance to learn ... enjoyby our ability to understand RebelAmericanZenDeist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 198 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Fixed It For You. I corrected an obvious error in your message.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Did you notice that none of those definitions restrict the location of the geologic column in any way Well, it does speak of it as a "stack" while the ocean deposits aren't deep enough to be a stack. They are obviously newer than the geological column as we find it on all the continenents, the column does not exist on the sea floor, and since they do not build upon that familiar well known geological column that defines all the time periods it's not part of it. And may I also point out that since it is new and does not build on the geological column, AND the geologtical column IS found across continents, this alone is evidence for the deposition of the geological column before the continents split, which is evidence for the RFlood. Ba Da Boom. Or whatever. Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024