Let's stick to facts. If both forms of dating are out by a factor of 12 , they would remain in accord.
Yeah, let's stick to facts, rather than your fantasies. You have no evidence that carbon dating is "out by a factor of 12" but
if ...
Well, if my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle.
Again, you are using mocking wording without backing up your statements:
http://www.madsci.org/...chives/2004-02/1075764676.Bt.r.htmlPlants will increase photosynthesis under increased pressures, absorbing more carbon 14 in the process, and absorb less under low pressures. Thus it is based on assumed consistency of air pressures. Carbon 14 dating is also based on assumed consistency in atmospheric carbon production.
I will continue to mock you until you make the least effort to find out what you're talking about.
™ Version 4.2
(1)
