Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,927 Year: 4,184/9,624 Month: 1,055/974 Week: 14/368 Day: 14/11 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   egotheistic pantheism revealed...
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 61 of 308 (377020)
01-14-2007 8:10 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by anastasia
01-14-2007 5:15 PM


Re: Inclusively Exclusive
What if the religion simply says there are many paths to the gate?
Nothing wrong with that! That's just the case. We all come from different cultures and starting points.
No matter what the gate turns out to be, or if the religion even attempts to explain, deify, personify or create the gate, they don't exclude THE gate from being true?
They could easily do that.
The point is, if they know the truth, then when presented with the Gospel, they will recognize Him.
If they have never heard of Him, but know him, then they will be saved. The Name of the Lord is many things to many languages. But the idea (the light of Him) is the same. C.S. Lewis made this point differently, but well in Mere Christianity.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by anastasia, posted 01-14-2007 5:15 PM anastasia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by anastasia, posted 01-14-2007 8:53 PM Rob has not replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 867 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 62 of 308 (377021)
01-14-2007 8:10 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Rob
01-14-2007 7:57 PM


What is this Thread About?
In Post 59:
Scottness writes:
Btw, this thread is not about the definition of religion. it is about the fact that all belief systems; all philosophies; all religions; and reality, are exclusive.
In Post 30:
Scottness writes:
This thread is about the spiritual falseness of Panthesm in the Monistic sense as a warning to those flirting with it's deception. they know who they are, and they are absent from this discussion for a reason.
So what is this thread about? Shouldn't you know?, you started it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 7:57 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 8:24 PM anglagard has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 63 of 308 (377022)
01-14-2007 8:16 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Rob
01-14-2007 7:57 PM


Re: on Maps
Btw, this thread is not about the definition of religion. it is about the fact that all belief systems; all philosophies; all religions; and reality, are exclusive.
If you want to prove me wrong, then don't disagree, or you will prove me right.
Bullshit. More blather and jabberwocky. Likely you will pull out the old crappola of Non-Contradiction like that was some talisman.
Sorry but Non-Contradiction is only an incantation of little minds when applied inappropriately.
Christianity can be right while Islam is right and Judaism is right and Hinduism is right and Taoism is right.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 7:57 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 8:47 PM jar has not replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 64 of 308 (377024)
01-14-2007 8:24 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by anglagard
01-14-2007 8:10 PM


Re: What is this Thread About?
So what is this thread about? Shouldn't you know?, you started it.
You got me there...
I suppose it is about the definition of religion, but in only one aspect.
Is the religion logically contradictory?
You tell me Anglagard... Does Spinoza consider his worldview to be exclusive?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by anglagard, posted 01-14-2007 8:10 PM anglagard has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by anastasia, posted 01-14-2007 8:41 PM Rob has replied

anastasia
Member (Idle past 5984 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 65 of 308 (377026)
01-14-2007 8:36 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Rob
01-14-2007 7:57 PM


Re: on Maps
scottness writes:
Btw, this thread is not about the definition of religion. it is about the fact that all belief systems; all philosophies; all religions; and reality, are exclusive.
Can you explain in clear terms?
All beliefs exclude reality?
Reality is exclusive?
Reality may exclude any other reality...but are you saying all religions exclude reality?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 7:57 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 9:15 PM anastasia has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 66 of 308 (377027)
01-14-2007 8:37 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by Modulous
01-14-2007 7:52 PM


Re: Pantheist here
This new age stuff you are talking about seems clearly egotheism that has come from a Hindu culture.
Yes, that is what I am talking about. Thank you very much.
And that variety of pantheism is what my opening post was talking about. I don't know how many times I have had to say that I know that panthesim is not monolithic.
Those of you who are not egotheists need not apply, but there is something more that needs to be said since it is very simmilar to Christianity as the Wiki article eluded to.
This is from a past research and thinking of mine:
Stating fact or arguing with reason is not, by any means, necessarily egotheist or fear based in nature. However, the denial of fact, or the inability to accept a reasonable and logical argument is always motivated by ego and fear. Some claims demand serious attention because the implications are so inescapably enormous.
That being said, the most offensive thing anyone could say to the fear and ego driven heart is, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except by me."
That is the ultimate, staggering, and exclusive claim to sovereignty. It is also a completely reasonable statement. Even so, such a statement is either motivated by the purest form of ego, and/or, it intends to manipulate by the most blatant use of fear, or such a statement is the most selfless expression and profound truth that any man will ever hear. It is a claim that only God can make consistently.
I believe that is why C.S. Lewis wrote the following:
“I am trying here to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: ”I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept His claim to be God.’ That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic”on a level with the man who says he is a poached egg”or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God: or else a madman or something worse. You can shut Him up for a fool, you can spit at Him and kill Him as a demon; or you can fall at His feet and call Him Lord and God. But let us not come with any patronizing nonsense about His being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to.”

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by Modulous, posted 01-14-2007 7:52 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by iceage, posted 01-14-2007 9:15 PM Rob has replied
 Message 131 by Modulous, posted 01-15-2007 2:25 AM Rob has replied

anastasia
Member (Idle past 5984 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 67 of 308 (377028)
01-14-2007 8:41 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by Rob
01-14-2007 8:24 PM


Re: What is this Thread About?
scottness writes:
I suppose it is about the definition of religion, but in only one aspect.
So now it IS about the definition of religion?
You tell me Anglagard... Does Spinoza consider his worldview to be exclusive?
Exclusive of other religion?
Tell me again, if there are pantheist christians, how is either exclusive? Why not just a slightly different explanation into which the other can be incorporated?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 8:24 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 8:49 PM anastasia has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 68 of 308 (377029)
01-14-2007 8:47 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by jar
01-14-2007 8:16 PM


Re: on Maps
Christianity can be right while Islam is right and Judaism is right and Hinduism is right and Taoism is right.
I don't deny that, but if that is true, then you must exclude my view that it is not.
So once again truth is exclusive.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by jar, posted 01-14-2007 8:16 PM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by anastasia, posted 01-14-2007 9:08 PM Rob has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 69 of 308 (377030)
01-14-2007 8:49 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by anastasia
01-14-2007 8:41 PM


Re: What is this Thread About?
Tell me again, if there are pantheist christians, how is either exclusive? Why not just a slightly different explanation into which the other can be incorporated?
I'm sure God wouldn't mind moderating his standards... they are awfully strict!
One little white lie would be ok I guess...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by anastasia, posted 01-14-2007 8:41 PM anastasia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by anastasia, posted 01-14-2007 8:58 PM Rob has replied

anastasia
Member (Idle past 5984 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 70 of 308 (377032)
01-14-2007 8:53 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by Rob
01-14-2007 8:10 PM


Re: Inclusively Exclusive
scottness writes:
The point is, if they know the truth, then when presented with the Gospel, they will recognize Him.
You know they don't Rob. Some do, some don't. And that is because they are coming from those different cultures and starting points. I say, if they know the truth, they know it. Showing them the gospel doesn't do anything but confuse a mind that is not steeped in the same culture. It happens all the time. Showing two Europeans of the same decade the gospel doesn't even mean they will recognize the truth...heck, no one can agree on what truth is in the gospel. There CAN only be one truth, right?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 8:10 PM Rob has not replied

anastasia
Member (Idle past 5984 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 71 of 308 (377033)
01-14-2007 8:58 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by Rob
01-14-2007 8:49 PM


Re: What is this Thread About?
scottness writes:
I'm sure God wouldn't mind moderating his standards... they are awfully strict!
But if Christianity is God's standard, how could it be reality and yet subject to moderation?
Edited by anastasia, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 8:49 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 9:19 PM anastasia has not replied

anastasia
Member (Idle past 5984 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 72 of 308 (377034)
01-14-2007 9:08 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by Rob
01-14-2007 8:47 PM


Re: on Maps
scottness writes:
The Name of the Lord is many things to many languages.
scottness again writes:
So once again truth is exclusive.
Please dissemble, or tell me my brain is fried?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 8:47 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 9:28 PM anastasia has replied

iceage 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5946 days)
Posts: 1024
From: Pacific Northwest
Joined: 09-08-2003


Message 73 of 308 (377035)
01-14-2007 9:15 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by Rob
01-14-2007 8:37 PM


Re: Pantheist here
Your OP leads with
scottness writes:
All philosophies and religions are exclusive... especially the pantheist ones.
And to substantiate this you want to be able to claim that an inclusive religious ideology has to include your whacked out views and since your whacked out views cannot logically fit in an inclusive framework you win - na na na na.
Your straw logic includes this assertion....
scottness writes:
The popular strain in the West (new age) doesn't necessarily say that all religions are right, but that all of them will lead to where the pantheists are
I have asked you to backup this assertion several time and you are not able to.
You so desperately want to use your imaginary trump card so you could smuggle demolish a competing religious system, using interesting enough logic.
I would say this thread is done, cooked, stick a fork into it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 8:37 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by Rob, posted 01-14-2007 9:22 PM iceage has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 74 of 308 (377036)
01-14-2007 9:15 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by anastasia
01-14-2007 8:36 PM


Re: on Maps
Reality may exclude any other reality...but are you saying all religions exclude reality?
I am not saying they necessarily exclude reality. They implicitely claim to be reality.
If they did not presume to be true, then no-one would belive them.
The devil masquerades as an angel of light. he doesn't come to us as a devil.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by anastasia, posted 01-14-2007 8:36 PM anastasia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by jar, posted 01-14-2007 9:19 PM Rob has replied
 Message 79 by anastasia, posted 01-14-2007 9:26 PM Rob has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 75 of 308 (377038)
01-14-2007 9:19 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by anastasia
01-14-2007 8:58 PM


Re: What is this Thread About?
But if Christianity is God's standard, how could it be reality and yet subject to moderation?
That's the point they can't. I was being sarcastic. My apologies...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by anastasia, posted 01-14-2007 8:58 PM anastasia has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024