|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: egotheistic pantheism revealed... | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Rob  Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days) Posts: 2297 Joined: |
What if the religion simply says there are many paths to the gate? Nothing wrong with that! That's just the case. We all come from different cultures and starting points.
No matter what the gate turns out to be, or if the religion even attempts to explain, deify, personify or create the gate, they don't exclude THE gate from being true? They could easily do that. The point is, if they know the truth, then when presented with the Gospel, they will recognize Him. If they have never heard of Him, but know him, then they will be saved. The Name of the Lord is many things to many languages. But the idea (the light of Him) is the same. C.S. Lewis made this point differently, but well in Mere Christianity.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
anglagard Member (Idle past 867 days) Posts: 2339 From: Socorro, New Mexico USA Joined: |
In Post 59:
Scottness writes: Btw, this thread is not about the definition of religion. it is about the fact that all belief systems; all philosophies; all religions; and reality, are exclusive. In Post 30:
Scottness writes: This thread is about the spiritual falseness of Panthesm in the Monistic sense as a warning to those flirting with it's deception. they know who they are, and they are absent from this discussion for a reason. So what is this thread about? Shouldn't you know?, you started it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 425 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Btw, this thread is not about the definition of religion. it is about the fact that all belief systems; all philosophies; all religions; and reality, are exclusive. If you want to prove me wrong, then don't disagree, or you will prove me right. Bullshit. More blather and jabberwocky. Likely you will pull out the old crappola of Non-Contradiction like that was some talisman. Sorry but Non-Contradiction is only an incantation of little minds when applied inappropriately. Christianity can be right while Islam is right and Judaism is right and Hinduism is right and Taoism is right. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Rob  Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days) Posts: 2297 Joined: |
So what is this thread about? Shouldn't you know?, you started it. You got me there... I suppose it is about the definition of religion, but in only one aspect. Is the religion logically contradictory? You tell me Anglagard... Does Spinoza consider his worldview to be exclusive?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
anastasia Member (Idle past 5984 days) Posts: 1857 From: Bucks County, PA Joined: |
scottness writes: Btw, this thread is not about the definition of religion. it is about the fact that all belief systems; all philosophies; all religions; and reality, are exclusive. Can you explain in clear terms? All beliefs exclude reality? Reality is exclusive? Reality may exclude any other reality...but are you saying all religions exclude reality?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Rob  Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days) Posts: 2297 Joined: |
This new age stuff you are talking about seems clearly egotheism that has come from a Hindu culture. Yes, that is what I am talking about. Thank you very much. And that variety of pantheism is what my opening post was talking about. I don't know how many times I have had to say that I know that panthesim is not monolithic. Those of you who are not egotheists need not apply, but there is something more that needs to be said since it is very simmilar to Christianity as the Wiki article eluded to. This is from a past research and thinking of mine:
Stating fact or arguing with reason is not, by any means, necessarily egotheist or fear based in nature. However, the denial of fact, or the inability to accept a reasonable and logical argument is always motivated by ego and fear. Some claims demand serious attention because the implications are so inescapably enormous.
That being said, the most offensive thing anyone could say to the fear and ego driven heart is, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except by me." That is the ultimate, staggering, and exclusive claim to sovereignty. It is also a completely reasonable statement. Even so, such a statement is either motivated by the purest form of ego, and/or, it intends to manipulate by the most blatant use of fear, or such a statement is the most selfless expression and profound truth that any man will ever hear. It is a claim that only God can make consistently. I believe that is why C.S. Lewis wrote the following: “I am trying here to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: ”I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept His claim to be God.’ That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic”on a level with the man who says he is a poached egg”or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God: or else a madman or something worse. You can shut Him up for a fool, you can spit at Him and kill Him as a demon; or you can fall at His feet and call Him Lord and God. But let us not come with any patronizing nonsense about His being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to.”
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
anastasia Member (Idle past 5984 days) Posts: 1857 From: Bucks County, PA Joined: |
scottness writes: I suppose it is about the definition of religion, but in only one aspect. So now it IS about the definition of religion?
You tell me Anglagard... Does Spinoza consider his worldview to be exclusive? Exclusive of other religion? Tell me again, if there are pantheist christians, how is either exclusive? Why not just a slightly different explanation into which the other can be incorporated?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Rob  Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days) Posts: 2297 Joined: |
Christianity can be right while Islam is right and Judaism is right and Hinduism is right and Taoism is right. I don't deny that, but if that is true, then you must exclude my view that it is not. So once again truth is exclusive.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Rob  Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days) Posts: 2297 Joined: |
Tell me again, if there are pantheist christians, how is either exclusive? Why not just a slightly different explanation into which the other can be incorporated? I'm sure God wouldn't mind moderating his standards... they are awfully strict! One little white lie would be ok I guess...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
anastasia Member (Idle past 5984 days) Posts: 1857 From: Bucks County, PA Joined: |
scottness writes: The point is, if they know the truth, then when presented with the Gospel, they will recognize Him. You know they don't Rob. Some do, some don't. And that is because they are coming from those different cultures and starting points. I say, if they know the truth, they know it. Showing them the gospel doesn't do anything but confuse a mind that is not steeped in the same culture. It happens all the time. Showing two Europeans of the same decade the gospel doesn't even mean they will recognize the truth...heck, no one can agree on what truth is in the gospel. There CAN only be one truth, right?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
anastasia Member (Idle past 5984 days) Posts: 1857 From: Bucks County, PA Joined: |
scottness writes: I'm sure God wouldn't mind moderating his standards... they are awfully strict! But if Christianity is God's standard, how could it be reality and yet subject to moderation? Edited by anastasia, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
anastasia Member (Idle past 5984 days) Posts: 1857 From: Bucks County, PA Joined: |
scottness writes: The Name of the Lord is many things to many languages. scottness again writes: So once again truth is exclusive. Please dissemble, or tell me my brain is fried?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
iceage  Suspended Member (Idle past 5946 days) Posts: 1024 From: Pacific Northwest Joined: |
Your OP leads with
scottness writes: All philosophies and religions are exclusive... especially the pantheist ones. And to substantiate this you want to be able to claim that an inclusive religious ideology has to include your whacked out views and since your whacked out views cannot logically fit in an inclusive framework you win - na na na na. Your straw logic includes this assertion....
scottness writes: The popular strain in the West (new age) doesn't necessarily say that all religions are right, but that all of them will lead to where the pantheists are I have asked you to backup this assertion several time and you are not able to. You so desperately want to use your imaginary trump card so you could smuggle demolish a competing religious system, using interesting enough logic. I would say this thread is done, cooked, stick a fork into it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Rob  Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days) Posts: 2297 Joined: |
Reality may exclude any other reality...but are you saying all religions exclude reality? I am not saying they necessarily exclude reality. They implicitely claim to be reality. If they did not presume to be true, then no-one would belive them. The devil masquerades as an angel of light. he doesn't come to us as a devil.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Rob  Suspended Member (Idle past 5879 days) Posts: 2297 Joined: |
But if Christianity is God's standard, how could it be reality and yet subject to moderation? That's the point they can't. I was being sarcastic. My apologies...
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024