Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,890 Year: 4,147/9,624 Month: 1,018/974 Week: 345/286 Day: 1/65 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   should creationism be taught in schools?
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 76 of 301 (282897)
01-31-2006 1:08 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by whitlee
04-22-2005 6:29 PM


By God, NO!
I was reading the book The Tower of Babel by Robert Pennock. He discussed a court case dealing with this issue. I wish I could remember the exact case, and who was involved, or even where it took place, but I remember the judge's ruling. He said "science is what scientists do."
So what does this mean? It means that whether Creationism is right or wrong (and it is most certainly the latter), it shouldn't be taught in a science classroom. A biology class would never discuss the beauty of early American Transcendentalist literature. Such a topic belongs in an English class. In a science class we are taught SCIENCE--not English, not computer networking, not foreign language, not government and law, etc.
"Science is what scientists do." Scientists DON'T do Creationism!
Trék

In considering the Origin of Species, it is quite conceivable that a naturalist... might come to the conclusion that each species had not been independently created, but had descended, like varieties, from other species. - Charles Darwin On the Origin of Species

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by whitlee, posted 04-22-2005 6:29 PM whitlee has not replied

Jon
Inactive Member


Message 77 of 301 (282899)
01-31-2006 1:22 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by mramos13
01-25-2006 11:47 PM


Hey there! Welcome to the forums fellow Minnesotan .
Fairness has nothing to do with it. Just because the students don't like what they are being taught, does not mean they should be taught something different. They are taught the truth (as scientists see it), and whether they like it or not is their own problem that they will have to deal with when they come to accept that we did evolve through a mindless process from basic life forms millions of years ago.
And furthermore, when we do look at it "from merely a scientific point of view," we see that evolution is the theory that needs teaching.
...would not be appropriate for people to have to hear about creation if they don't believe in it...
It is a science class. The students' beliefs have nothing to do with the curriculum. In fact, it would be even more inappropriate to teach children garbage science like Creationism as though it was even half-way valid.
...the same can be said of students now who are hearing about evolution and not believing in it. Isn't it unfair for them?
Like I said, fairness has nothing to do with it. We don't teach children that which makes them feel good; we teach them that which is correct... I mean, I know most certainly that statistics doesn't make me (or most of the other students in the class) feel good, that doesn't mean the curriculum should be changed.
While I agree that creationism should not be taught in schools...
That's what we like to hear .
Trék

In considering the Origin of Species, it is quite conceivable that a naturalist... might come to the conclusion that each species had not been independently created, but had descended, like varieties, from other species. - Charles Darwin On the Origin of Species

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by mramos13, posted 01-25-2006 11:47 PM mramos13 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024