Hey there! Welcome to the forums fellow Minnesotan
.
Fairness has nothing to do with it. Just because the students don't like what they are being taught, does not mean they should be taught something different. They are taught the truth (as scientists see it), and whether they like it or not is their own problem that they will have to deal with when they come to accept that we did evolve through a mindless process from basic life forms millions of years ago.
And furthermore, when we do look at it "from merely a scientific point of view," we see that evolution is the theory that needs teaching.
...would not be appropriate for people to have to hear about creation if they don't believe in it...
It is a science class. The students' beliefs have nothing to do with the curriculum. In fact, it would be even more inappropriate to teach children garbage science like Creationism as though it was even half-way valid.
...the same can be said of students now who are hearing about evolution and not believing in it. Isn't it unfair for them?
Like I said, fairness has nothing to do with it. We don't teach children that which makes them feel good; we teach them that which is correct... I mean, I know most certainly that statistics doesn't make me (or most of the other students in the class) feel good, that doesn't mean the curriculum should be changed.
While I agree that creationism should not be taught in schools...
That's what we like to hear
.
Trék
In considering the Origin of Species, it is quite conceivable that a naturalist... might come to the conclusion that each species had not been independently created, but had descended, like varieties, from other species. - Charles Darwin
On the Origin of Species