Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,886 Year: 4,143/9,624 Month: 1,014/974 Week: 341/286 Day: 62/40 Hour: 3/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   should creationism be taught in schools?
2ice_baked_taters
Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 566
From: Boulder Junction WI.
Joined: 02-16-2006


Message 84 of 301 (288290)
02-19-2006 2:16 AM


The scientific thought process has proven to be a great tool into understanding the workings of our environment. It's very nature separates it from faith. This is essential. If we look at the history of belief systems....they have propagated endless false assumptions based on "divine belief" The history of religions has also been very divisive. Well so has science I guess....the divisive part is human nature.
Science has a hard enough time weeding out it's own bad eggs. At least the nature of science will force any views it holds to continually be re-examined. By its nature scientific thought will not fall into the trap of "divine truth". That is the beauty of that thought process.
The spiritual/eternal/moral...ect. is a whole other animal. It is another thought process altogether. Science has no conscience. It needs none...that is not it's purpose. Intent and meaning are spiritual matters. Intelligent design implies intent with further implied deeper meaning and therefore has no place in the realm of scientific thought.
In fact there is a danger to clear scientific understanding if one begins to infer intent. The human fallibility factor would go through the roof in terms of scientific study. "intent is completely subjective"
Likewise Science has no place in claiming that there is no such animal as a higher power in whatever form without impirical evidence. Otherwise science will fall into the category of faith and religion.
This message has been edited by 2ice_baked_taters, 02-19-2006 06:28 PM

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 02-19-2006 2:33 AM 2ice_baked_taters has not replied

2ice_baked_taters
Member (Idle past 5879 days)
Posts: 566
From: Boulder Junction WI.
Joined: 02-16-2006


Message 85 of 301 (288291)
02-19-2006 2:33 AM
Reply to: Message 84 by 2ice_baked_taters
02-19-2006 2:16 AM


The tunnel of science=the tunnel of religion
I would also say that if a person has used science to arrive at the conclusion that a higher power does not exist then they have used the process as a religion and have sadly missed the boat or are in denial of a large part of what it means to exist. And we do exist....well at least I do....because I say so.....and you must have trust/have faith that I do or in truth to scientific thinking....deny my existence.
Yes...yes...I know...I am merely chemical processes and an intricate string of learned responses emanating from a collective network of single celled organisms ect...ect....
Glad to meet you to...
This message has been edited by 2ice_baked_taters, 02-19-2006 06:33 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 02-19-2006 2:16 AM 2ice_baked_taters has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 86 by Dr Adequate, posted 08-11-2006 6:48 PM 2ice_baked_taters has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024