Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Did the Biblical Exodus ever happen?
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 179 of 657 (599384)
01-06-2011 9:58 PM
Reply to: Message 176 by jar
01-06-2011 9:08 PM


Re: No Ducks Dead
jar writes:
There is NOTHING in it that suggests there are geological features holding the Israelites up. In fact it totally refutes the idea that it was geography slowing them down, rather it is God that steps in and tells them to stop and wait for Pharaoh. There is no mention of some wadi or any geographic restrictions
Jar, you continual allegement that ole man Buz who's been studiously into the Bible for 60 plus years is a Biblical novice is getting wearisome. Lay off it.
Obviously you're unaware of Exodus 14:2, 3. Jehovah is telling Moses what will happen after they follow his instructions.
Exodus 14:2, 3 (ASV)
2 Speak unto the children of Israel, that they turn back and encamp before Pihahiroth, between Migdol and the sea, before Baal-zephon: over against it shall ye encamp by the sea.
3 And Pharaoh will say of the children of Israel, They are entangled in the land, the wilderness hath shut them in.
Entangled is synonymous to entrapped. They are shut in, i.e. entrapped.
It is also logical to assume that they were entrapped in rugged terrain. Else they would have fled by an escape route. Go figure.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
Time Relates To What Is Temperal. What Is Eternal Is Timeless.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 176 by jar, posted 01-06-2011 9:08 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 181 by jar, posted 01-06-2011 10:08 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 187 by DrJones*, posted 01-07-2011 12:04 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 182 of 657 (599389)
01-06-2011 10:16 PM
Reply to: Message 178 by jar
01-06-2011 9:37 PM


Re: Say What?
jar writes:
Let's look at that evidence Buz, it was covered in Message 28 and in Message 36.
In Message 36 I provided a link to what water flow eroded rocks look like. They are rounded. They have been tumbled. There are no images of water eroded rocks at Horeb.
Did you even read my explanations as to why this is nonsense? [/qs]In addition, the rock claimed as the rock at Horeb is not at all unusual and I provided many links to similar split rock formations from all over the world.[/qs]
These other formations are straw-men examples, Jar. They have no corroborating relationship to the region in this discussion nor do they have anything resembling a waterflow. Even if they did, what would it prove relative to this debate?

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
Time Relates To What Is Temperal. What Is Eternal Is Timeless.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 178 by jar, posted 01-06-2011 9:37 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 183 by jar, posted 01-06-2011 10:27 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 484 by MiguelG, posted 04-12-2011 9:11 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 184 of 657 (599391)
01-06-2011 10:30 PM
Reply to: Message 181 by jar
01-06-2011 10:08 PM


Re: No Ducks Dead
jar writes:
.....confusion.......hemmed in by the desert Buz.
What version are you quoting from, Jar? What ever it is, it's not very literal to the Hebrew. There's a big difference between the meaning of the words, confusion and entanglement., the latter the literal. There also can be a big difference in the meaning of the words, desert and wilderness, the later, the more literal. Wilderness coupled with entanglement coupled with the context, implying that the only escape was through the seaway, coupled with all of the other corroborating evidence is indicative of entrapment.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
Time Relates To What Is Temperal. What Is Eternal Is Timeless.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 181 by jar, posted 01-06-2011 10:08 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 186 by jar, posted 01-06-2011 10:54 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 189 by ringo, posted 01-07-2011 12:18 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 185 of 657 (599392)
01-06-2011 10:49 PM
Reply to: Message 180 by Theodoric
01-06-2011 10:00 PM


Re: Reviewing The Evidence
Theodoric writes:
Why would the Saudi's have a vested interest in undermining the biblical record. Do you know anything about Islam?t Any idea how the Islamic religion feels about Moses? You might want to learn something about the subject.
I know a whole lot about Islam. I have a copy of the Koran and am aware of what it says. I also have other books as well as the Internet from which I've acquired some knowledge.
I know that the Bibles have been confiscated in Saudi Arabia.
U.S The U.S State Department International Religious Freedom report detailed several cases in which bibles were confiscated in Saudi Arabia,.......
It is regarded as somewhat competitive to the Quran. It is also forbidden to be propagated in the nation whereas the Quran is not.
For Islamists to ascribe to the Biblical exodus, would be for them to legitimize the nation of Israel. After all, Biblically, Jehovah promised the land of Canaan to the Jews forever. No?

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
Time Relates To What Is Temperal. What Is Eternal Is Timeless.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 180 by Theodoric, posted 01-06-2011 10:00 PM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 188 by Theodoric, posted 01-07-2011 12:11 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 192 by Percy, posted 01-07-2011 8:15 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 485 by MiguelG, posted 04-12-2011 9:19 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 204 of 657 (601830)
01-24-2011 2:46 PM
Reply to: Message 203 by Trae
01-24-2011 4:13 AM


Re: More Strawmen and Evidence Denial
Trae writes:
Buzsaw writes:
You have yet to show any evidence of an ancient highway up the Western shoreline of the Gulf of Aqaba. We're still waiting for that.
LOL. The strawman Roman Empire didn't exist to build any highways for Moses's time.
Via Traiana Nova - Wikipedia
The problem Buz is that you haven't shown any evidence for the pillar's history, you only hope it is a pillar dating to Moses' time (whenever that might be).
With the above link we know that there was a road which normally would have some single pillars (the road makers were pillars) leading to places which presumably had other pillars.
Your road is made of straw, man. Your link map is nowhere near the Nuweiba region. Let's see a road route leading down the Western coast to Nuweiba Beach. Then we'll talk.
The images in this link give you a better idea of the terrain, things about the columns etc. Could they h ave been entrapped on this beach. Of course they could have.
Btw, the columns were not one of my high evidences. They were thrown in for good measure

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 203 by Trae, posted 01-24-2011 4:13 AM Trae has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 205 by jar, posted 01-24-2011 2:53 PM Buzsaw has seen this message but not replied
 Message 206 by ringo, posted 01-24-2011 3:45 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 210 by Trae, posted 01-25-2011 2:19 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 207 of 657 (601914)
01-24-2011 11:49 PM
Reply to: Message 206 by ringo
01-24-2011 3:45 PM


Re: Which Sinai
ringo writes:
Nuweiba is a non-starter. It's on the wrong side of Sinai. It's much, much too far away. There's no conceivable reason for the children of Israel to have gone that way.
The Biblical record says Sinai is in Arabia. The corroborating evidence does not take you to the traditional Mt Sinai. You need to show some corroborating evidence for justification of the traditional Mt Sinai sizing up to the Biblical record. The depth of the sea near the traditional Sinai is no where near as shallow as Nuweiba. It's very deep, as is most of the Red Sea.
There is a conceivable reason for them to go there. Jehovah wanted to destroy Pharaoh's army so as to rid Israel of his threat from then on all of the way to the eventual Promised Land.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 206 by ringo, posted 01-24-2011 3:45 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 208 by ringo, posted 01-25-2011 1:38 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 209 by PaulK, posted 01-25-2011 2:05 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 212 by Theodoric, posted 01-28-2011 2:11 PM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 214 of 657 (602562)
01-28-2011 7:57 PM
Reply to: Message 212 by Theodoric
01-28-2011 2:11 PM


Re: Explaining the Nuweiba Sea Bottom Topography
Theodoric writes:
Please show us this shallow crossing at Nuweiba.
Here is a christian site that presents a very comprehensive refutation for Nuweiba.
LOL, Theodoric. What the image shows is what the crossing site is today. What the image does not show is what the crossing site was before the waters were separated long enough to dry up the crossing site, a great multitude of people and animals to cross and for Pharaoh's large army of chariots to enter the sea.
In order for the sea bed to wind dry and for the great multitude, including the animals, etc to get across, a significant amount of water would have built up upstream where the Jordan River flowed into the sea at it's inlet. A significant amount of time would have passed. For the great multitude a relatively wide area would have been dried, leaving an extremely great depth of water upstream where the Jordan flowed in. .
Then after Jehovah lifted the thick cloud preventing Pharaoh from moving was lifted there would have had to be significant time for the large army of pursuers to move up and to completely occupy the sea floor.
Now, consider the North upstream wall of water and the South downstream wall. Upstream, the Gulf of Aqaba would have become significantly higher as the River Jordon flowed into it while the activity was going on at the crossing. Downstream the sea level would have waned some as the flow from the Jordan would have been shut off.
The build up from the North side would have rendered the North depth higher than the South depth. What this would have created is a tsunami. We all know the power of water to erode. What one should expect to see today is precisely what the image shows; a deep cut in the middle of the crossing site as the North wall of water overpowered the south wall, effecting a North to south tsunami.
The least affected would have been nearer to the shores as the deeper area of the sea above the site would have been where the erosion would have been the greatest. Likely this is why relatively few chariot parts and other things from the army remained as evidence relatively near the shore lines.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 212 by Theodoric, posted 01-28-2011 2:11 PM Theodoric has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 216 by Dirk, posted 01-28-2011 8:39 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 223 by DrJones*, posted 01-28-2011 10:46 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 272 by Trae, posted 01-31-2011 5:34 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 487 by MiguelG, posted 04-12-2011 9:46 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 215 of 657 (602566)
01-28-2011 8:29 PM
Reply to: Message 192 by Percy
01-07-2011 8:15 AM


Re: Reviewing The Evidence
Percy writes:
Buzsaw writes:
I know that the Bibles have been confiscated in Saudi Arabia.
Were the Saudis confiscating Old Testaments? Or were they perhaps confiscating the normal western Bibles we're all familiar with that contain both Old and *New* Testaments?
As Theodoric has been trying to explain to you, Moses is a revered figure in Islam.
But Muslims would find the New Testament claim that Jesus is the son of God objectionable. The Koran even states at one point, "Allah is but one God. Allah forbid that he should have a son!" (4:171, look it up in you Koran). However, Islam does revere Jesus as a prophet.
--Percy
From what I've understood, no Bibles are allowed to be dispersed or preached in Saudi Arabia. Though Mohammed gleaned distorted doctrines that suited his concocted up scripture, he never acknowledged the Biblical god, Jehovah. Nor did he ever acknowledge Jehovah's favor-ability to Jacob and his 12 tribe sons who became the patriarchs of Israel over Esau, (ABE: Jacob's brother, who's descendents were the enemies of Israel.) Certainly, Saudi Arabia would have a vested interest in avoiding the Exodus, favorable to the Jews and all else relative to the Old Testament scriptures which were favorable to the Jews and unfavorable to the Islamic nations.
I'm not aware of any of Mohammed's references to Moses which would have been favorable to the Jews, when, in fact Moses was all about the Jews. He only referenced him and others, gleaning from them what suited him. He also, like Joseph Smith, referenced Biblical characters in order to lend some credence to his distortions as a scripture of sorts.
Certainly that strategy worked quite nicely for Johnny come lately scripture distorters like Mohammed and Joseph Smith. It shows right here at EvC, as some have cited that as favorable to Mohammed and his Koran. No doubt it is a significant factor in the conversion of Americans to Islam.
Edited by Buzsaw, : Edit an error about Esau's relationship to Jacob.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 192 by Percy, posted 01-07-2011 8:15 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 217 by jar, posted 01-28-2011 8:57 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 222 by bluescat48, posted 01-28-2011 10:44 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 274 by Theodoric, posted 01-31-2011 10:07 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 218 of 657 (602576)
01-28-2011 9:31 PM
Reply to: Message 216 by Dirk
01-28-2011 8:39 PM


Re: Explaining the Nuweiba Sea Bottom Topography
Dirk writes:
In order for the sea bed to wind dry and for the great multitude, including the animals, etc to get across, a significant amount of water would have built up upstream where the Jordan River flowed into the sea at it's inlet.
Ummm, Buzsaw, you might want to check up on your knowledge of the Near Eastern geography a little bit. First, the Jordan has never been more than a trickling stream compared to rivers in Europe or Asia; it's not the Amazon or something like that.
And second, and more to the point, the Jordan doesn't flow into the Red Sea, but into the Dead Sea... There was no water inlet on the northern side of the Red Sea.
Downstream the sea level would have waned some as the flow from the Jordan would have been shut off.
Wrong again. On the south side the Red Sea connects to the Gulf of Aden and from there to the Indian Ocean (which, in fact, is the only major water inlet of the Red Sea). There is plenty of water in there to keep the water level at the same elevation.
I stand corrected on the North/South tsunami point and the Jordan. I didn't have my thinking cap on.
However, the back up from both North and South would have still been significant enough to cause extensive erosion, particularly from the middle where the greater pressure would have been from the deeper center from both directions. A tsunami of sorts would have been created.
Perhaps also, Jehovah, in order to make sure no one survived, released one direction ahead of the other so as to sweep the army into the deeper waters. This also would have buried the majority of them so as not to rise to the surface and escape.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 216 by Dirk, posted 01-28-2011 8:39 PM Dirk has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 219 by jar, posted 01-28-2011 9:38 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 220 of 657 (602580)
01-28-2011 9:57 PM
Reply to: Message 217 by jar
01-28-2011 8:57 PM


Re: Reviewing The Evidence
jar writes:
More utter nonsense Buz.
The Exodus story IS included in the Qur'an. For example one part begins at 002:49,
quote:
002.049
YUSUFALI: And remember, We delivered you from the people of Pharaoh: They set you hard tasks and punishments, slaughtered your sons and let your women-folk live; therein was a tremendous trial from your Lord.
002.050
YUSUFALI: And remember We divided the sea for you and saved you and drowned Pharaoh's people within your very sight.
...
Moses is a major Prophet of Islam.
You tend to forget that Jews, Christians and Muslims all worship the same God.
I checked the context of the quotes above. Nothing in these verses or in the context specifies the Jews or Jehovah. He refers to you and refers to them as the people of Moses and not the people of Jehovah. In lands where the Old Testament is forbidden, the ones reading this, not being aware of the OT scriptures would not likely equate the you to the Jews, nor as the people of the Biblical god, Jehovah.
Admittedly Americans and others in our time from nations having Bibles would be aware of more than those not having Bibles.
I'm quite sure that Saudi Arabia does not allow the propagation or dispersing of any part of the Bible in that nation. If you can show otherwise, I'd like to see your source.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 217 by jar, posted 01-28-2011 8:57 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 221 by jar, posted 01-28-2011 10:10 PM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 224 of 657 (602601)
01-29-2011 9:01 AM
Reply to: Message 223 by DrJones*
01-28-2011 10:46 PM


Re: Explaining the Nuweiba Sea Bottom Topography
DrJones* writes:
What the image does not show is what the crossing site was before the waters were separated long enough to dry up the crossing site, a great multitude of people and animals to cross and for Pharaoh's large army of chariots to enter the sea
What evidence do you have to support your assertion that "crossing site" was shallower in the past than it is today?
We have the debris and all of the corroborating observable evidence that I have cited supportive to the Biblical account of the event. We deduce from that the knowledge of the erosive energy of a tsunami wash back from the walls of water.
We also have significant evidence for the existence of the Biblical god, Jehovah such as the fulfilled prophecies, historical data and archeology, etc.
The notable Josephus is an example of a non-Biblical historian who acknowledges the Biblical flood event happening some 2500 years before his time.
Time and again I've cited these things. Yet to a person, you skeptics keep on keeping on harping that Buzsaw has never ever produced one iota of credible evidence for the Biblical record, the existence of the Biblical god, Jehovah and particularly the Exodus event. Time and time again ye skeptics keep on demanding that Buzsaw produce some evidence, as you have here, but when I do, it is all simply waived off.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 223 by DrJones*, posted 01-28-2011 10:46 PM DrJones* has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 226 by Huntard, posted 01-29-2011 10:47 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 227 by Dirk, posted 01-29-2011 10:50 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 228 by ringo, posted 01-29-2011 11:31 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 229 by PaulK, posted 01-29-2011 12:03 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 243 by DrJones*, posted 01-29-2011 9:42 PM Buzsaw has seen this message but not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 225 of 657 (602602)
01-29-2011 9:06 AM
Reply to: Message 222 by bluescat48
01-28-2011 10:44 PM


Re: Reviewing The Evidence
Yah, my bad. I got that all balled up. Gotta leave now. Will address it when I get back.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 222 by bluescat48, posted 01-28-2011 10:44 PM bluescat48 has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 232 of 657 (602633)
01-29-2011 4:53 PM
Reply to: Message 222 by bluescat48
01-28-2011 10:44 PM


Re: Reviewing The Evidence
bluescat48 writes:
Though Mohammed gleaned distorted doctrines that suited his concocted up scripture, he never acknowledged the Biblical god, Jehovah.
Jehovah is not the Biblical god, not as Jehovah which is nothing but an English corruption of the German spelling of the Hebrew YHWH.
The German spelling is Jahveh
You can debate that with the linguists. The translators of nearly all English versions of the Bible used Jehovah. Somewhere in the archives there's a thread on that in case you want to go there. It's off topic here.
Nor did he ever acknowledge Jehovah's favor-ability to Jacob and his 12 tribe sons who became the patriarchs of Israel over Esau, the son of Abraham's handmade, Hagar, from whom Israel's enemies descended.
Esau was Isaac's son and twin bother of Jacob, later called Israel. Hagar was Ismael's mother. And you claim to be a Bible Scholar?
You're right. I should have reviewed what I said before posting. At 75 I plead, senior moment. Perhaps some day you'll be there and do that now and then.
I've edited Message 215 for the correction.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 222 by bluescat48, posted 01-28-2011 10:44 PM bluescat48 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 237 by bluescat48, posted 01-29-2011 6:00 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 233 of 657 (602634)
01-29-2011 5:08 PM
Reply to: Message 227 by Dirk
01-29-2011 10:50 AM


Re: There Is No Evidence
Dirk writes:
Hi Buzsaw,
Time and again I've cited these things. Yet to a person, you skeptics keep on keeping on harping that Buzsaw has never ever produced one iota of credible evidence for the Biblical record, the existence of the Biblical god, Jehovah and particularly the Exodus event. Time and time again ye skeptics keep on demanding that Buzsaw produce some evidence, as you have here, but when I do, it is all simply waived off.
The fact that your "evidence" is refuted time and again should make you think. Did you ever consider (and are you willing to consider) the possibility that this happens because the exodus simply did not happen and there is no evidence?
LOL. I have cited more corroborating observable evidence for the acclaimed Biblical Exodus event than scientists have for the Big Bang singularity and multi-verse theory. It's a given. Folks who avoid accountability to a higher power will never acknowledge one whit of evidence supportive to such a power such as the Exodus evidence is.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 227 by Dirk, posted 01-29-2011 10:50 AM Dirk has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 234 by PaulK, posted 01-29-2011 5:39 PM Buzsaw has seen this message but not replied
 Message 236 by jar, posted 01-29-2011 5:55 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 245 by Dirk, posted 01-29-2011 10:41 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 247 by NoNukes, posted 01-30-2011 10:12 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 235 of 657 (602637)
01-29-2011 5:50 PM
Reply to: Message 221 by jar
01-28-2011 10:10 PM


Re: Reviewing The Evidence
jar writes:
Allah is the God of the Bible Buz, Jehovah is simply a mistaken translation from German.
We've debated this in the thread, YHWH, Yahweh, Jehovah, adonai, lord, elohim, god, allah, Allah thread. over five years ago, Jar. I suggest that you go there and review that debate. If you have something new and profound there's where you can debate it with whoever cares to engage you 'til your heart's content.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 221 by jar, posted 01-28-2011 10:10 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 238 by jar, posted 01-29-2011 6:02 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 239 by Admin, posted 01-29-2011 6:04 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024