Did the Flood really happen?

And how many times do *I* have to tell YOU that the oceans are not building on the geological column?AS I SAID, your candidates for today's deposition on the geo column are either too small though in the right place or large enough but in the wrong place. The Geological Column is OVER AND DONE WITH. Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

The broken off strata is much better
Next, draw the sea level line
Put the granite rock/mountain on its left
Show the left part of the strata falling into the ocean on that side
Show the right part of the strata falling down through the sea level line
with the upper broken ends remaining above it and spreading out along that line
Show the lower part of that block of strata forming what we see below the sea level line on the diagram we'd been discussinbg

No. I've said many times by now that the problem with the candidates for continuation of the Geological Colum -- meaninjg those accumulated on the land area, not in the coean where the problem is that they are in the wrong location -- is that their extent is too small. Minuscule. In that area the Geological Column covers thousands of square miles. I haven't argued it but the candidates are also too shallow since most of the strata are quite thick, up to hundreds of feet thick.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Good bye. And try to understand what the Geological Column is while you're gone.

So if it's too small we just imagine that eventually a whole bunch of small deosits of the same sediment will accumulate on the Geo Column hither and yon until eventually we have a new stratum for our time, complete with fossils even. Gosh what faith you all have!Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

I guess I missed them.

Uh huh, but there's no point in pretending I haven't answered a nonsensical point when I have, whether you like it or not.

I don't understand "FIFY."

Well, it does speak of it as a "stack" while the ocean deposits aren't deep enough to be a stack. They are obviously newer than the geological column as we find it on all the continenents, the column does not exist on the sea floor, and since they do not build upon that familiar well known geological column that defines all the time periods it's not part of it.And may I also point out that since it is new and does not build on the geological column, AND the geologtical column IS found across continents, this alone is evidence for the deposition of the geological column before the continents split, which is evidence for the RFlood.Ba Da Boom. Or whatever.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

I have no idea what you are talkinjg about, and leave my messages alone.

Well, but I HAVE provided such evidence.

The "stack" begins with precambrian rocks and ascends through the sedimentary layerss from Cambrian through Holocene, variations of which is what we find on the continents;
it does not exist on the sea floor. What is being laid down on the sea floor is therefore not building on the geological column. You guys are kidding yourselves.The Geological Column or Timescale is OVER AND DONE WITH. Ba Da Boom!Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

There is no problem with defining the Geo Column as the strata we find in various forms on all the continents from Precambrian to Holocene. Nothing else is necessary to the definition and by this definition we have no further growth of the Geological Column. It is OVER AND DONE WITH.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Now now now, I never said that "geological processes have ended." I said the Geological COLUMN, otherwise known as the Geological Timescale, has ended.ABE: That is, defined in the only way that makes any sense, there are no processes continuing that are truly the same as those of the geological column, what you are all claiming as its continuation has no resemblance to it. It is dead, Razzy, over and done with. Geological processes of all sorts continue, but not the same processes that built the Geo Column, and this is demonstrable just by comparing them. They are not the same processes.The Geological Column is OVER AND DONE WITH.And that is evidence for .... Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

I'm sure I've read more books than you've ever had in your bookcases. However, I am not in a library, I'm on the public computer in my apartment building. Nothing but computers here. And unfortunately my eyes are getting so bad I don't even try to read whole books any more. But one of my favorite talk show hosts with a background in diet and health recommended Bilberry extract for macular degeneration, and although there is a small amount of that in the formula I take I'm going to get a concentrated form of the extract and see if it helps. Nevertheless I must confess that I often miss stuff on the forum just because there's so much of it.