Did the Flood really happen?

Preach your religion to someone else. Statements of faith that cannot and are not supported have no place in a discussion.

I agree, there is no other nature.

No. People believe the claims of origins posited by science over their own personal beliefs. That does not make it anything more than beliefs. In every instance posters raised here so far, what you thought was evidence was actually beliefs foisted onto evidences.

Give the spinning head routine a rest. Nature is what it is today. It exists. The nature of yesterday and tomorrow will also exist and did exist. You have not addressed the temporal nature issue.

Dictionary.com says this."that which tends to prove or disprove something; ground for belief; proof."That works for me. Believing, for example nature was a certain way in the past on earth is not proof. Not evidence.

quote:

---

That's not a scientific definition. Science deals with real-world observations and measurements.

---

The scientific definition must conform. The present world is what you consider the real world and it is real now. However, the present nature is not real in the far past or the future. Therefore when you offer predictions of the past or future based on the present real world, that is not any measurement at all, but a belief based projection."Science noun
noun: sciencethe intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment."

One can only conform to small and restricted definitions that don't apply to broader issues so much. What one cannot do is apply those little in box definitions beyond the limits they apply.

Science has limits and those are determined by the scope of knowledge and abilities they have, not by them voting on it! Ha.

The use of the word actually goes beyond the limits of so called science and even actual science. The need for proof of claims does not end when one dons a lab coat and spouts off on TV.

Address the issues here and evidence your position. I'd prefer not to descend to the level of childishness and foot stomping and cry baby whining that you try to goad us into.

If science has no limits, raise the dead! Fly people to the stars!Humble down and admit man has limits in knowledge and ability.

A scientific discussion for you seems to be insulting others, and making silly statements.The flood is not within the power of science to determine one way or the other. The way science models the past is using the present and nature today. That does not fit any definition of the word evidence.

quote:

---

Physics, this universe, as revealed to us by this science, limits what actions matter and energy can take. The science is not limited. The physics is.

---

Total baloney. You are unable to admit the limits of man's knowledge and abilities.

Unless you want to deny that science assumes a same nature in the past it is a matter of scientific basis for models. Your other choice is to prove it.

quote:

---

As with all physical things in this universe the laws of physics places strict limits on the physical actions of we puny humans

---

Time is not a law of physics nor is space. One limit science has is the limit of being unable to leave the solar system area. Science also only deals with the present nature and laws on earth and has no way to deal with anything else. It lives here.

quote:

---

But it has also allowed through the emergent properties of our physical minds an intellect and a creative imagination that appear unbounded through time.

---

Speaking of unbounded imagination, you seem to have some.

quote:

---

You are right, I cannot admit to limits on our knowledge and abilities because, as history has shown us, unfettered by religious shackles, both knowledge and ability continue to progress. There is a vast universe of knowledge to be uncovered and we humans have just barely begun to explore. We have overcome so many "limits" to our knowledge and ability in the past that only a religious fool would suggest this will not continue.

---

Fine, don't admit you don't know it all. Your religion of hate toward other religions is not something I respect.