Believing it is not proving it

I'd like to post here if it is ok.. then he needs to work on defining what he means, by christian, and evolution,etc
spiritual belief is not logical at all i guess someone else saying that thier belief is absolute doesn't sit well with you then? doesn't that seem a bit.. hypocritical? yes, and RR's version is some obscure, strawman version of both christianity and evolution, he needs to define what he means, maybe then jar can understand him its only a contradiction if you have standards that make it a contradiction, i'm thinking RR is setting it up to be one not that it really is one maybe YEC's do but they arn't the majority or standard eather yes in your view, but the fact that jar holds differing views from your own kind of calls in a question of bias agenst him, i would say this about anyone though i think robins argument is illogical, since he sets it up to be a contradiction

i think the idea that evolution rules out a god only works if you define christianity as only the YEC belief, evolution does rule out a YEC view, but hey god could use evolution, he can do anything he wants right?

Like I said before about robin's position, its all based on a strawman version of god not on what people believe in realityhis arguement over morals is kind of meaningless since we can't directly ask god why he does or does not do somethingthe problem i see is robin is playing god is good based on our morals, which is the common view of most of the fundi groups
when in reality god is Benevolent and not all good considering all the OT stuffalso RR are you sure you are a nilist? shouldn't you not care one way or another?{Pointing out robinrohan's topic Non-belief and Nihilism. - Adminnemooseus}This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 04-02-2006 05:38 PM

why does he need to be all good i would say he is is benevelent, he doesn't show all that much goodness in the OT

ok then why is it logical? Why is it logical that thier can only be one version of god? what authority do you base this on?if its the bible, well that just kind of destroys the logic, since a text on the religion itself wouldn't be logical or unbiasit is all opinion, there is no logic involved just your strawman version of a god you don't believe in

how? did you just one day come up with the idea that god can only be good? what led you to this conclusion? why not conclude that god is a bastard, or doesn't care? I mean dozens if not hundreds of people came to that conclusion over the yearsthe only way you could come up with the omni stuff is through the bible or christian teachings