But you refuse to address the arguments that have been put up against you. You are just repeating and asserting your same old stuff which is exactly what Robin was challenging.
Of course he doesn't. I'm not sure why you said no evos (except rr) challenge jar. I think most of the time he is an okay poster, but sometimes he gets stuck in a position and will not open up to anything. Unfortunately I feel that is almost always the case for him as moderator.
Ironically, this thread is a perfect example. Remember when I got suspended (you came to my defense at that time if I remember right)? Jar had closed down my thread which was essentially this exactly the same thing as what you have done here, because He said it wasn't worthy and could have been done with links instead of quotes.
When I asked why and what people should do in the future all I got was NWR saying he supported Jar's decision that it should never have been started. And Percy apparently thought so too, to the point that my simply asking for clarification got me booted.
Yet apparently they all believe its okay to promote and run this one of yours.
What's the difference? Nothing. But they will run to the defense of Jar's decision, and apparently Jar doesn't find such a discussion "boring" or part of your personal file cabinet, when the issue under discussion is himself or things he has said.
When Jar isn't responding to reason, just drop it. You can't argue him into adopting reason.
This message has been edited by holmes, 04-01-2006 10:51 AM
holmes
"Some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace and safety of a new dark age." (Lovecraft)
™ Version 4.2
