EvC Forum: Does ID follow the scientific method?

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: Does ID follow the scientific method?

bluescat48

Member (Idle past 4219 days)

Posts: 2347

From: United States

Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display

Message 30 of 325 (591912)
11-17-2010 1:54 AM

Reply to: Message 26 by Dawn Bertot
11-16-2010 10:45 PM

Re: Finally the Scientific Method of Intelligent Design

Percy as Admin in message 18 writes:

In other words, Dawn believes that ID accepts the scientific method, and this thread is for exploring whether ID actually follows this method.

emphasis by me.

Dawn in message 26 writes:

Before you get to eager to see what a hypothsis of ID is, remember that Percy made it very clear that this thread is NOT about ID, due the the fact that it is a conclusion. What we are discusiing here is IDs methodology in comparison with the SM, to see if they jive.

To compare your IDM with SM it is necessary to show the ID hypothesis which is in no way discussing ID simply what the comparison of ID is to the scientific method. With no hypothesis there is nothing to compare.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002

Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
	Message 26 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-16-2010 10:45 PM		Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 43 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-18-2010 2:45 AM		bluescat48 has replied

bluescat48

Member (Idle past 4219 days)

Posts: 2347

From: United States

Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display

Message 51 of 325 (592136)
11-18-2010 11:45 PM

Reply to: Message 43 by Dawn Bertot
11-18-2010 2:45 AM

Re: Finally the Scientific Method of Intelligent Design

Sure there is, the methods we both employ will be exacally the same correct? Hypos are derived from those general methods correct?

NO the hypothesis comes first. That is what one is trying to evaluate to find if the evidence supports it, that is a trial solution to the premise.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002

Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
	Message 43 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-18-2010 2:45 AM		Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 60 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-19-2010 2:36 AM		bluescat48 has not replied

bluescat48

Member (Idle past 4219 days)

Posts: 2347

From: United States

Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display

Message 79 of 325 (592253)
11-19-2010 11:35 AM

Reply to: Message 75 by Percy
11-19-2010 8:02 AM

Re: One step would be to define what ID isn't

Having spent 26 years in active & inactive military service, it offends me not. Even when I was in the military I thought of military intelligence as an oxymoron.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002

Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
	Message 75 by Percy, posted 11-19-2010 8:02 AM		Percy has seen this message but not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button

3 online now:	AZPaul3, DrJones*, Theodoric
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 13/65 Hour: 0/0